Still, even factoring in only his knees, what makes you think he'd have even one or two impact years?
Well, you just posted, "It was never a question whether he would come in be an impact player"
How short of a window COULD he have in terms of being an impact player? He just had a couple of very very good seasons in college.
What leads you to believe that either Cunningham or Pendergraph won't provide the same eventual impact?
Because they were mediocre college players. Mediocre college players rarely turn into anything more.
Let's look at a couple of guys who were second rounders that blossomed in the NBA "out of nowhere": Brandon Bass and Paul Millsap.
Brandon Bass was the SEC player of the year as a sophomore. Paul Millsap led the nation in rebounding for three straight years.
Compare that to Cunningham and Pendergraph.
Cunningham? Most improved Big East player and second team all-Big East.
Pendergraph? Pac-10 All-Freshman honors in 2005-06, Pac-10 honorable mention honors in 2006-07, third-team All-Pac-10 in 2007-08 and first-team honors in 2008-09. Led the nation in FG% as a senior.
Sorry... those accomplishments just aren't at the same level of Bass and Millsap IMO.
They've done a fairly stellar job of it so far. Each draft we "reach" to unexpectedly pick a player/s and low-and-behold, we find hidden gems.
I TOTALLY disagree. The Blazers do NOT reach for players, and that's why they succeed. They took Bayless because he dropped. They took Batum after he was widely considered to be a lottery pick previously and then he slipped into the 20's because of some weird report about his heart right before the draft.
When has Potland "reached" for a player? I can't think of a single one that has actually panned out... Koponen and Freeland might both be considered reaches, but that's it... until this year.
If our scouts like Cunningham/Pendergraph better than Blair for the present and future, there's some solid reasoning behind it.
Or they made a mistake.
Ed O.