BigGameDamian
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 33,812
- Likes
- 13,718
- Points
- 113
Also when you use PED's or any other drug like this, Should you stop using it the drug will usually work against you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, then I guess the folks who run the professional sports leagues have the Free Will to want to run them in a way that doesn't compromise a player's long term health for a short term improvement in performance. Athletes have the Free Will to decide to agree to abide by the rules, or break them and potentially suffer the consequences.
Does that mean my kids can cheat on tests to get into a better college, to get a better job than they probably deserve? Cheating is cheating, whether you agree it should be or not is different.
Isn't it really about the theory of sport? For me, it's about natural human potential, not about drugging yourself up as much as possible to see what the scientific human potential is.
Cycling for me is the best example. You see a ride like Floyd Landis did in Stage 17 of the 2006 TdF or Tyler Hamilton's Stage 16 breakaway with a broken collarbone and are blown away by the strength of their spirit, of their ability to assert their will, to conquer pain and fatigue. Then you find out later those performances were a lie, because it wasn't a level playing field.
Sure it was fun watching Bonds and McGuire battle for the home run title at the turn of the century, but it diminished what Babe Ruth and Roger Maris accomplished.
If people want to roid up, I suggest there be a different league for those players, much like there is a natural bodybuilding circuit. Some may wish to watch the scientific human potential, but I will always prefer natural human potential, with everyone playing by the same rules.
How is taking a drug to get better different than going on a crazy diet or using some crazy exercise equipment that most people don't want to do? Should those diets and exercises be against the rules too? They aren't "natural".
Are you being intentionally obtuse? You don't see a difference between changing the food someone eats or the movements they use to condition their muscles, and the ingestion or injection of a synthetic substance designed to allow their bodies to do something it would not be able to do otherwise?
lifetime expectancy of an NFL player is in his 50s.
http://strengthplanet.com/other/15-surprising-facts-about-world-class-athletes.htm
9. What is the life expectancy of world class athletes?
Not so good. The average elite athlete will die by the age of 67. That is considerably lower then the 76 year life expectancy of the average American. Do you want to hear something that is really scary? According to the NFL Players Association, the average life expectancy of an NFL player is 58 years of age.
(The guys are seriously well paid, though. That's the choice they make)
But if the primary benefit is faster healing - what's wrong with that?
That is some great evidence for the harmful effects of PEDs. If they were taken out of sports like football maybe life expectancy would be closer to that of the average American.
You actually believe that?
Why do people keep calling sports "natural" and "nature"?
Sports aren't nature, people.
People do things other people don't want to do to get ahead all the time. That's how shit works. That's how this should work. New ways to get better at things are found all the time, there's nothing wrong with using them, they're just as "natural" as sports are.
I read something years ago, maybe don't recall the details exactly, it was talking about guys working on their lower bodies, but it said the impact of NFL linemen coming off the line and blasting into each other was something like a 30-MPH impact. Repeatedly. I may not have that exactly right, but it seems plausible. And it may be even worse now with improved training regimes, and yes, PEDs.It's not the peds, it's 300lb guys running into 300lb guys repeatedly for years.
Are you being intentionally obtuse? You don't see a difference between changing the food someone eats or the movements they use to condition their muscles, and the ingestion or injection of a synthetic substance designed to allow their bodies to do something it would not be able to do otherwise?
According to the NFL Players Association, the average life expectancy of an NFL player is 58 years of age. (The guys are seriously well paid, though. That's the choice they make)
You're against synthetic substances like modern medicine?
Yes, I do. McGwire is the classic example. He was always a great hitter - nagging injuries held him back through much of his career.
It keeps coming back to the same points: if HGH or TRT or a host of other steroids had no legit medical use or were highly dangerous, your Dr couldn't prescribe them to YOU. If they are legit, legal medical treatments for YOU, why are they illegal for players?
Yes, I do. McGwire is the classic example. He was always a great hitter - nagging injuries held him back through much of his career.
But they don't run them in a way that doesn't compromise their health. The lifetime expectancy of an NFL player is in his 50s.
I use Post Enhancing Drugs.
They don't seem to be working.
They are not legit, and very few doctors actually prescribe them, and then only in very specific instances.
One excellent reason they don't belong in sports lies in the ridiculous advantage they give someone over his/her competitor. They actually completely remove the "sport" from sports. You may as well introduce androids into the game.
In 1927, with the nation cheering him on, Babe Ruth hit 60 home runs.
In 1961, under a yearlong barrage of hate mail and death threats, Roger Maris hit 61 home runs.
It is now 2013, and no un-juiced player has ever touched those phenomenal records. Roids make keeping record books meaningless. They make watching the game a pointless waste of time.
I thought this thread was about Penis Enhancing Drugs?![]()
