- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 73,079
- Likes
- 10,919
- Points
- 113
You are confused.
barfo
I think you are. Your positions on issues change 180 degrees depending on who's president, instead of what's right or you believe in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are confused.
barfo
People who attempted to force Clinton down the throats of Americans are at fault.
I'm allowed to complain about that, just like everything else.
You wasted your vote by voting for Clinton.
Don't like the logic I'm using? stop trying to use it on me.
I think you are. Your positions on issues change 180 degrees depending on who's president, instead of what's right or you believe in.
Nobody attempted to force Clinton down the throats of Americans
barfo

Tell that to the superdelegates.
![]()
It's funny because it's irrelevant and misleading?
Clinton won the majority of the votes in the primaries, and the majority of the pledged delegates, in addition to the majority of the superdelegates.
Eliminate the superdelegates, she still won.
barfo
No, you just think my position changed. I wanted single payer then, I want single payer now.
barfo

Even this support for single payer is hypocritical.
"Where does this money that the Feds help with come from?"
-- barfo
![]()
No, I'm the piece of shit.
Nobody attempted to force Clinton down the throats of Americans any more than people attempted to force Bernie, or Trump, or Jill Stein down our throats.
Ok, that's fair. I do not mean to deny you the right to complain about whatever you want to complain about.
I mean, you can cut your nose off to spite your face, and then complain about not being able to smell. It's a free country.
That's true. I didn't get much out of the vote, other than the satisfaction of knowing that I did what I could to stop Trump from being President.
I like your logic fine.
barfo
Hm, I guess I should have used green font so you could figure out I was mocking you.
Americans are so shitty that we'll watch a million people die?Cool! How many people die directly because of this? A million maybe?
Only ~ 2/3rds comes from tax dollars.No idea what point you think you are making, sorry. You think it is hypocritical to observe that federal spending comes from tax dollars?
barfo
Sure, but the elderly and the sick don't tend to pay a lot of taxes, so it's back to the young and healthy again.
Sure, if a company takes on part of the risk, the premium cost goes down. Similarly, if the government takes on part of the risk, the premiums go down. Single payer for the win.
barfo
You are losing track barfo. The self insured companies don't pay premiums, they take the risk which is low since they screen the prospective employees, Physical exams you know.
So those employees (the largest pool in the country) do not offset many of the sick and lame. This falls on the people that Buy insurance, the young, the self employed, the small business and their employees.
The result is, the ObamaCare burden falls on these groups rather unfairly, the only ones really affected by the law to force them to purchase insurance at inflated prices. The reality is, it is tax and the tax targets a minor portion of the population very unfairly. I think the Chief Justice called it a Tax, right? But not everyone is burdened by it. Not me, although Obama sure intended to do so
when force many of us retirees off the corporate self insured system. Are you affected?
Only ~ 2/3rds comes from tax dollars.
You talk like a fiscal conservative again. But when your guys were printing money and running up the debt, you were cheering them on.
Apparently so does MarAzul, but you complained that covering people would cost money.If you thought I was making a distinction between tax and borrowing, you misunderstood.
I'm fine with government taxing to pay for healthcare. I'm fine with government borrowing to pay for healthcare. I think healthcare is important.
barfo
Apparently so does MarAzul, but you complained that covering people would cost money.
A few years back, I suggested to the CEO of the ~50 person company I worked at that he should see if he couldn't just pay the clinic two blocks away a monthly fee for the employees' health care needs. Then sock away a few months' insurance premiums to cover expensive procedures - like one guy's appendix removal, or to see specialists.
For the $1M a year in saved premiums, we could basically self insure and everyone gets the care they need.
The clinic charged about $100 for basic office visit. They'd probably take a couple thousand a month for all our basic services.
Yeah, there are a number of ways that this could be made better. The company you speak of joining up with a few more to more effectively share the risk. Perhaps even across stale lines where like minded people could help each other. Individual State governments have been screw these possibility up for years now.
I guess you want the federal government to run everything
Yes, I suppose it is the right of the States to screw things up. Well they did a pretty good job in this area for some time now.Some would call that 'States Rights
No, I didn't. You misread my post.
barfo
Not at all. You backpedaled into a borrow and spend position.
So how about food? Food is just as important as health care, or people starve. Why not single payer for the groceries?
How about housing? Housing is just as important as health care, or people die from exposure. Why not single payer for housing?
Arguments for single payer are just downright silly.
This seems like a way to make a million dollars as valuable as a penny.I like Denny's idea, everyone should have a million dollars and just pay cash for services at their local clinic.