Science Right-to-carry laws make us less safe

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Rastapopoulos

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
42,595
Likes
26,967
Points
113
Is anyone REALLY surprised by this?




I'm guessing some Stanford researchers are about to get death threats from peace-lovin' gun owners.
 
You will Never find this law in NJ or NY. The gangs are the only ones that believe they have a right to carry.
 
I'm moving to CA in a couple days. I'm leaving most of my firearms in WA but I need to look into the laws. I think there is a 10 round limit/magazine so I'll probably just bring my carry 40 which only holds 6 rounds, and perhaps my shotgun.

Anyone with CA experience, speak up, I don't want to do anything illegal. I will travel with firearms unloaded and in a locked container. Anything else?
 
http://www.politifact.com/florida/s...-gaetz/violent-crime-lower-states-open-carry/

Not all open carry states are the same, however, and laws vary from state to state. The Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence lists states that prohibit the open carry of handguns in public places, states that allow open carrying without a permit, and states that require some form of license to open carry. They currently list five statesthat prohibit the open carrying of handguns in public places.

But that’s not the only issue with these statistics.

We asked several experts about Gaetz’s methodology. Many of them said the single law was too narrow to draw meaningful conclusions about its impact. In essence, his number -- for one year -- is right, but so what?

Gaetz framed the use of the stats as "evidence that this bill does not create a less safe environment." John Pierce, co-founder of gun rights group OpenCarry.org, agreed with that point. But he said the data doesn't necessarily reflect a correlation between allowing open carry and fewer instances of violent crime.

He noted that Texas and Florida are both populous states with huge numbers of concealed carry permit holders so focusing just on open carry laws will give a skewed picture about the effect of legally-armed citizens on crime rates.

Tomislav Kovandzic, a University of Texas professor who teaches classes on research methods and gun control, was more blunt.

"The problem with this approach is that it implicitly assumes that both groups of states were identical/similar before the laws in the treatment states (in this case, open carry states) were enacted," Kovandzic told PolitiFact via email. "This is rarely, if ever, the case. As a result, the comparison merely reflects group differences that existed before the treatment states enacted the laws."
 
I read the links. Garbage science.

Synthetic control? Give me a break.

Texas is compared to a synthetic version of itself comprised of California, Nebraska and Wisconsin?

Get the fuck out with that shit.

I don't particularly care for open carry or guns in particular but making shit up to back your preconceived notions does not help.
 
Right to carry?

We're talking about abortion right?
 
Oh, of course the British guy who thinks Trump and Republicans are the anti-Christ believes in Gun Control. What a surprise.

I'll take the words of Self-Defense instructors/experts, the NRA-ILA (among others), and those who actually carry firearms before I'll listen to you or some moron bean counter at Stanford.

And anyone who takes firearms knowledge or information from Leftist sources seriously is a fool. They are about as unbiased on issues of firearms and Carry Laws as Hillary Clinton is honest, and if they weren't so biased, they would see that their own ignorance speaks against common sense when it comes to this issue. A retarded child can see the folly of that study.

"Science"? What a joke. This is the kind of garbage that's found in the back of supermarket tabloids about Celebrities.
 
Oh, of course the British guy who thinks Trump and Republicans are the anti-Christ believes in Gun Control. What a surprise.

I'll take the words of Self-Defense instructors/experts, the NRA-ILA (among others), and those who actually carry firearms before I'll listen to you or some moron bean counter at Stanford.

And anyone who takes firearms knowledge or information from Leftist sources seriously is a fool. They are about as unbiased on issues of firearms and Carry Laws as Hillary Clinton is honest, and if they weren't so biased, they would see that their own ignorance speaks against common sense when it comes to this issue. A retarded child can see the folly of that study.

"Science"? What a joke. This is the kind of garbage that's found in the back of supermarket tabloids about Celebrities.
Just as a retarded child can see the dangers of unfettered gun ownership.......but then I guess it depends on your definition of "retarded".....
 
I believe if I were the only one with a gun I would be really safe. I'm less safe with all of you fucks having them.

Me only with gun = safe

Everyone with guns = less safe
 
Just as a retarded child can see the dangers of unfettered gun ownership.......but then I guess it depends on your definition of "retarded".....

And what is your definition of "unfettered gun ownership"? I guarantee you they are most likely Liberal talking points that have NO basis in fact.
 
I believe if I were the only one with a gun I would be really safe. I'm less safe with all of you fucks having them.

Me only with gun = safe

Everyone with guns = less safe

This also applies to tanks, bazookas, and cobras.
 
I believe if I were the only one with a gun I would be really safe. I'm less safe with all of you fucks having them.

Me only with gun = safe

Everyone with guns = less safe

Depends on where you live. Do you live in a ghetto where every day is a fight for survival? Or do you live in a law-abiding, peaceful and fruitful community?
 
Depends on where you live. Do you live in a ghetto where every day is a fight for survival? Or do you live in a law-abiding, peaceful and fruitful community?

Daisy Hill Puppy Farm.
 
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ni...injured/ar-BBDvVvu?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp
since May over 30 shootings in Arkansas...non related to terrorism or mental illness....all from gun toting americans arguing about shit that were carrying...shootings are increasing no matter what fucking political beliefs we have....

Really? You're going to take a bunch of criminals and lump them in with the majority of Gun Owning America?

Please be more sensible than that.
 
Puppies are evil. You need that gun.

Donald+trump+puppy+hollywoodleekcom_f58472_3883329.jpg
 
And what is your definition of "unfettered gun ownership"? I guarantee you they are most likely Liberal talking points that have NO basis in fact.
My politics have absolutely nothing to do with it, so please don't even try to go there. That's nothing more than a red herring. I base my views on common sense, along with facts and related factual information. My lifelong personal opinion (please note I said "personal opinion") is that handgun ownership is either for the perpetually fearful or for those who have low self esteem. Beat me up all you want, statistics favor the need for stricter gun controls. And all the NRA propaganda you choose to dig up and all the political finger pointing in the world isn't going to change that. Time to move on.....
 
Really? You're going to take a bunch of criminals and lump them in with the majority of Gun Owning America?

Please be more sensible than that.
21 shot last night...pretty current news whether you want to call them criminals and lump them in with the majority of criminals is up to you..I don't know any of those folks...but I know there were a lot of guns in that nightclub...and it didn't keep the peace or make anybody safer
 
I believe if I were the only one with a gun I would be really safe. I'm less safe with all of you fucks having them.

Me only with gun = safe

Everyone with guns = less safe

Some day, You may catch on to why I prefer to arm my companions when I want too.
 
This is the kind of garbage that's found in the back of supermarket tabloids about Celebrities.
I won't ask how you know this...I sure wouldn't but your entire post was a childish insult and is full of shit....but maybe that's how you intend to talk with people...get off your anti British horse cowboy....this is an international community whether you can handle it or not..I know plenty of hunters and war vets who don't agree with gun laws as they stand....you might want to stop leaving them out in the cold because your Soldier of Fortune magazine subscription is feeding your vitriol...people are not as shallow as you seem to need them to be bucko
 
Last edited:
21 shot last night...pretty current news whether you want to call them criminals and lump them in with the majority of criminals is up to you..I don't know any of those folks...but I know there were a lot of guns in that nightclub...and it didn't keep the peace or make anybody safer
DDVJaGeXoAEIakQ.jpg
 
When you consider the fact that you are the only person responsible for protecting yourself and those that depend on you, it is foolish to be unarmed when you need to be.
When's the last time being armed saved your life?
 
When's the last time being armed saved your life?
If I was stupid enough to go to the concert this happened at I'd sure as fuck want to be armed.

Every moron there has no right to complain or sue...
 
I own guns

Don't want to see them banned but want stricter controls, especially if guns are stored in a house with a minor (Locks should be required) or to carry open or concealed (proficiency training and range time should be required).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top