wizenheimer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 25,037
- Likes
- 38,125
- Points
- 113
it might be the camera angle or shoes...but Rupert was 6'6 w/o shoes; Murray was 6.7.75. Scoot looks considerably shorter
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it might be the camera angle or shoes...but Rupert was 6'6 w/o shoes; Murray was 6.7.75. Scoot looks considerably shorter
Yeah 4 inches shorter just like Joe said.it might be the camera angle or shoes...but Rupert was 6'6 w/o shoes; Murray was 6.7.75. Scoot looks considerably shorter
It's something like a zipcode where he grew up.Is there a reason Rupert is 72? Sure I just missed seeing the reason somewhere.
If I’m the rest of the league I am terrified of what those two can become together.
