Zombie Rush the Stimulus Package...don't read it, just pass it! (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

But the spending wasn't emergency spending.

Your house may be on fire, a real emergency, but it doesn't make sense to go charge up your credit cards buying a new car (not related to putting out the fire).

http://www.thecapitol.net/glossary/def.htm#Emergency_Spending

"Emergency" Spending:
Spending with the "emergency" designation does not count against budget caps. While often used for one-time, unforeseen events, this designation has also been used to circumvent budget limits. For example, spending for the census has been designated as "emergency" spending. (Source: CQ Today)

http://www.eyeonthestatehouse.org/2008/03/13/curbing-emergency-spending/

As part of the debate over the Congressional budget resolution, Ohio Senator George Voinovich introduced an amendment to curb “emergency” spending. Trying to eliminate the abuse of this type of spending is long overdue.

The federal budget process is a complicated one. If Congress wants to spend money, it must comply with a variety of rules. However, there are a variety of loopholes that make federal spending easier. One of the most abused is “emergency” appropriations. By labeling something “emergency” spending, Congress can bypass ordinary rules and essentially spend money “off budget.”
Senator Voinovich’s office put it in this way:
If spending is designated as “emergency,” it is exempted from budget controls and spending limits. An example of the sort of emergency spending that concerns Sen. Voinovich is the designation of funding for the 2000 Census as emergency, even though the U.S. Constitution has required a census every 10 years since 1790.
Congressman Ron Paul describes it in these terms:
Congress funds the federal government through 13 enormous appropriations bills, but even an annual budget of more than $2 trillion is not enough to satisfy Washington’s appetite for new spending. As a result, a new category of spending bill has emerged, known as the “emergency supplemental” appropriation.

There’s no real emergency, however; Congress simply needs a 14th spending bill as a grab bag filled with hundreds of pages of goodies for countless favored groups, industries, individual companies, and foreign governments. It’s common for dozens of amendments to be added to the supplemental bill, all with more money for somebody.

So-called emergency supplemental spending bills, once a rarity, have become the norm over the last ten years in Washington. There’s always some excuse why Congress cannot stick to its budget, so supplemental bills are passed to permit spending extra “off-budget” funds. “Emergency” spending now has become routine, planned spending.
Finding a way to curb this abuse of the budget process is an imortant step in restoring fiscal discipline.
Of course it's an emergency. Haven't you read about our 3 Million plus who are now newly unemployed?
If not for the Covid19 emergency I would suggest getting out more often.
 
Of course it's an emergency. Haven't you read about our 3 Million plus who are now newly unemployed?
If not for the Covid19 emergency I would suggest getting out more often.
Lanny, These posts are from 2009.
 
The two massive spending bills that no one read and rushed to sign into law that I have so far lived through has done different things to my local library:

The first one allowed government agents to look at my library records, the second gave my library a new eco-efficient roof!
The latest bill is 1,000 pages. I grew weary just reading the first 50 pages of the Republican version. Long bills are one of the reasons Congressmen have staffs.
 
Lanny, These posts are from 2009.
Holy ahir. I have never seen them before. Why would someone renew a thread that old?

Edit:
What's going on? I would never say 'ahir' mean I mean 'shit' as in "Holy shit."
 
Last edited:
Holy ahir. I have never seen them before. Why would someone renew a thread that old?
Please don't be offended at this, but I think you might have clicked on a link that sent you there. As it appears you were the one who revived the 2009 thread. Before your post here about amtrak a few minutes ago the last one was 2009 by papag.
 
Please don't be offended at this, but I think you might have clicked on a link that sent you there. As it appears you were the one who revived the 2009 thread. Before your post here about amtrak a few minutes ago the last one was 2009 by papag.
No, it was in the list of current subject threads.
 
I'm not sure what to tell you. Anyways it's a thread from 2009 we can move on. :)
Yes, we can move on but it's near the top of my list of current threads. How could this happen? That's got me baffled. And why do I see it but you don't? Ah, life's mysteries.
 
Good read. How adults discuss aNd debate politics. Alot of us posters today could take heed to how this thread went vs how threads about politics go today.
Today all it is is fingerprinting and name calling...
 
Holy ahir. I have never seen them before. Why would someone renew a thread that old?
Its like you and I, we are that old, but rejuvenation is a stimulant. Make's me horny!
 
Its like you and I, we are that old, but rejuvenation is a stimulant. Make's me horny!
Horny, horny, hmm, the word is familiar but I'm just too old to recall what it means. I do have the feeling that it was something good in my college days in the last century.
 
Please don't be offended at this, but I think you might have clicked on a link that sent you there. As it appears you were the one who revived the 2009 thread. Before your post here about amtrak a few minutes ago the last one was 2009 by papag.

Speaking of which, what happened to papag?!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top