Politics S2's Right-Wingers

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
MARIS61 said:
The only sources I have found to be factual 100% of the time are Wikileaks and Judicial Watch, and watching CSPAN.

Everything else is political hyperbole.
Click to expand...

and yet majority of your links come from Faux News.
 
DaLincolnJones said:
Think about the situation. If he had anything, with all the opposition to the President, do you not think that we would all have seen it yet?
Click to expand...

No, I don't think we would see it yet. Why would Mueller make evidence public on an ongoing investigation? Do detectives doing an investigation of a murder let out all the evidence before the arrest? That would not only be foolish but can kill a case as well.
 
Last edited:
DaLincolnJones said:
Think about the situation. If he had anything, with all the opposition to the President, do you not think that we would all have seen it yet?
Click to expand...
This is the common mistake about the investigation...it's not aimed at Trump, it's aimed at Russia, Ukraine, Bank of Cypress and a circle of payola, pay for play, money laundering tax evading influence peddling lobbyists whom Trump had hired for his team...and Trump's lawyer....it's a funny money trail that connects people who have political ties and corrupt business practices...why wouldn't that get investigated? Much more important than a blow job in the oval office...Trump has always surrounded himself with fall guys he can dump blame on...and he does.
 
CupWizier said:
No, I don;t think we would see it yet. Why would Mueller make evidence public on an ongoing investigation? Do detectives doing an investigation of a murder let out all the evidence before the arrest? That would not only be foolish but can kill a case as well.
Click to expand...

Come on, bud. After all this time? If the Gov had a beef with you, or anyone else you can reasonably think of, would it take this long? Here is an example..the feds in the thirties could make a case without computers and the net far faster. This guy has thousands of guys at his disposal looking for the slightest thing to jump on and it has been a year and a half.time for a reality check.
 
riverman said:
This is the common mistake about the investigation...it's not aimed at Trump, it's aimed at Russia, Ukraine, Bank of Cypress and a circle of payola, pay for play, money laundering tax evading influence peddling lobbyist who Trump had hired...and Trump's lawyer....it's a funny money trail that connects people who have political ties and corrupt business practices...why wouldn't that get investigated? Much more important than a blow job in the oval office
Click to expand...

remember re KISS concept? Keep it simple stupid? If you want to follow illegal dealings, look no further that the Clinton's.
 
DaLincolnJones said:
remember re KISS concept? Keep it simple stupid? If you want to follow illegal dealings, look no further that the Clinton's.
Click to expand...
That's all fine...I'm all for ferreting out corruption..the blowjob gate was as partisan a witch hunt as we've ever seen
 
Last edited:
DaLincolnJones said:
Come on, bud. After all this time? If the Gov had a beef with you, or anyone else you can reasonably think of, would it take this long? Here is an example..the feds in the thirties could make a case without computers and the net far faster. This guy has thousands of guys at his disposal looking for the slightest thing to jump on and it has been a year and a half.time for a reality check.
Click to expand...

How long did Benghazi take? How long did Nixon take? A case this enormous needs the proper time to make sure everything is checked, double checked and then checked again. Spilling the beans too soon can kill a case. This has not been a long investigation compared to others of similar significance.
 
DaLincolnJones said:
remember re KISS concept? Keep it simple stupid? If you want to follow illegal dealings, look no further that the Clinton's.
Click to expand...

Typical Republican response. Dodge and deflect. This is about Trump and his administration. The Clintons aren't in politics anymore and have no position in office.
 
riverman said:
Used to be Korg...now it's Yamaha
Click to expand...
A friend of mine designs high tech music synthesizers. He's an electronics genius. Oops, just remembered, he's now designing lighting with LEDs.
 
CupWizier said:
How long did Benghazi take? How long did Nixon take? A case this enormous needs the proper time to make sure everything is checked, double checked and then checked again. Spilling the beans too soon can kill a case. This has not been a long investigation compared to others of similar significance.
Click to expand...
Benghazi was two years with zero indictments.

The Mueller investigation has been going on for a little over one year and returned 20 indictments with some convictions already and assuredly more convictions to come. Undoubtedly more indictments to come also.

I suspect we'll here more from Mueller in two maybe three months. He's onto a rich vein of indictments from a highly crooked administration.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top