Sarah Palin Has Balls!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Palin is as dumb as a brick, and she treats her constituents like they are equally as dumb.
 
mook said:
I don't see why you bring up Biden repeatedly. I don't really care one way or the other about him. *shrug*
Click to expand...

Because no one questioned Biden's intelligence during the election, and he's a maroon. You also mentioned that you wouldn't want someone that dumb near the Oval Office, and yet you have someone dumber a heartbeat away without complaint.

mook said:
I'm not ignoring your definition. I'm observing your application of your definition. You think Palin has common sense because she agrees with a lot of things you agree with. Shocking.
Click to expand...

I brought up things that people with no idea of economics, finance or law would know are bad ideas on their face. That I happen to agree with many of them isn't germane. It's common sense I'm highlighting.
 
Last edited:
hasoos said:
Palin is as dumb as a brick, and she treats her constituents like they are equally as dumb.
Click to expand...

Ah, the certitude of ignorance. And just when I think I'm the most arrogant poster on this forum. Thanks for giving me a run for my money.
 
maxiep said:
Do you really want to compare idiot fringes?
Click to expand...

Sure.

First video: "I won't have to worry about putting gas in my car. I won't have to worry about paying my mortgage. You know, if I help him, he's going to help me."

Why does everyone think she's saying that she won't have to pay for her gas or mortgage? If you look at the text and leave out your preconceived notions about liberals in America, all she is saying is that she won't have to worry. As in, she is worrying now, but she won't have to later. Can you you pay your bills and not have to worry about them? Yes, if you can afford them.

Second video: that dude is a spaz and he works at McDonalds. He wants benefits. He is asking if he will get benefits under Obama's plan.

Third video: a large group of homeless and very poor people are lining up to try and get government aid at the last minute and there is chaos. This is hardly surprising. I'm still trying to figure out why you call this mob an "idiot fringe."


Let's compare.

Left idiot fringe: Obama is going to help me pay my bills, get job benefits and receive government aid when I am trying to get back on my feet.

Right idiot fringe: Obama is going to round people up and burn them in ovens because he is the second coming of Adolf Hitler.

No comparison.
 
hasoos said:
Palin is as dumb as a brick, and she treats her constituents like they are equally as dumb.
Click to expand...

Nonetheless, they saw something in her to elect her. And, I have no doubt she will probably be elected senator at some point in time.
 
yakbladder said:
No, actually I'm interested to know.

Can you give me an example of one non-subjective thing that they've done that has illustrated their "liberal bias" and contempt for Palin?
Click to expand...

Ever seen the unedited version of the Katie Couric interview?
 
BlazerWookee said:
Ever seen the unedited version of the Katie Couric interview?
Click to expand...

No, do you have a link to it?

To be fair, ANY news organization whether the hated liberal media or the despised fascist media would capitalize on anything that was remotely out of bounds of stock answers because it generates viewers. So I expect some dramatics. But her interview was..well..all bad. All. It sounded from the clip I heard yesterday that Palin even said as much.

Nonetheless, I'd be interested to see an unedited version to get the overall message. I just don't think editing was making her say those answers.
 
maxiep said:
Ah, the certitude of ignorance. And just when I think I'm the most arrogant poster on this forum. Thanks for giving me a run for my money.
Click to expand...

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to maxiep again.
 
yakbladder said:
No, do you have a link to it?

To be fair, ANY news organization whether the hated liberal media or the despised fascist media would capitalize on anything that was remotely out of bounds of stock answers because it generates viewers. So I expect some dramatics. But her interview was..well..all bad. All. It sounded from the clip I heard yesterday that Palin even said as much.

Nonetheless, I'd be interested to see an unedited version to get the overall message. I just don't think editing was making her say those answers.
Click to expand...

I'll keep looking. I'm not saying she did well in the interview, but quite some time ago I saw raw footage vs. edited footage, and they really did do a hatchet job on her, and made her admittedly weak and rambling answers seem FAR worse than they were.
 
maxiep said:
You can disparage people who attend tea party protests all you wish, but it's the very definition of a grass roots movement.
Click to expand...
To the Left, a "grassroots movement" is a wonderful thing as long as it's done to advance civil rights, protest global warming, or protect abortion. If it's undertaken against a Democratic president who is trying to create a new socialist order, however, it's a horrible thing being carried out by stupid, ignorant people.

See how it works?
 
Last edited:
Shooter said:
Yes, it's called public education.
Click to expand...

I must not have gotten enough public education, because I don't understand what you are trying to say. Education is politics? We shouldn't pick on Palin because she went to public schools? Something else?

barfo
 
barfo said:
I must not have gotten enough public education, because I don't understand what you are trying to say. Education is politics? We shouldn't pick on Palin because she went to public schools? Something else?
Click to expand...
Yes.

Public education is a world where the dumb get promoted because it would just be too painful to hold them back. Everybody's a winner, don't you know!!!
 
barfo said:
I must not have gotten enough public education, because I don't understand what you are trying to say. Education is politics? We shouldn't pick on Palin because she went to public schools? Something else?

barfo
Click to expand...

I believe it's about how there are no "losers" in some sports associated with public schooling, when kids are like in the 2nd grade or younger are just awarded for trying.

Obviously it extrapolates to every public school in the country having that as their m.o., in how they educate every student in school.
 
Shooter said:
Yes.

Public education is a world where the dumb get promoted because it would just be too painful to hold them back. Everybody's a winner, don't you know!!!
Click to expand...

You just described a big issue with NCLB.
 
Shooter said:
Yes.

Public education is a world where the dumb get promoted because it would just be too painful to hold them back. Everybody's a winner, don't you know!!!
Click to expand...

Seems like a bit of a non-sequitur, since we were talking about politics. If you want to go that far off topic, you could point out the Special Olympics, too.

barfo
 
I saw her interview on Oprah.

It never occurred to me that she was offended by Couric's question about what she reads. She said she took it as an insult, as in "you're stupid, can you even read?"
 
Denny Crane said:
I saw her interview on Oprah.

It never occurred to me that she was offended by Couric's question about what she reads. She said she took it as an insult, as in "you're stupid, can you even read?"
Click to expand...

Wait. Too many pronouns! :ohno:
 
Denny Crane said:
I saw her interview on Oprah.

It never occurred to me that she was offended by Couric's question about what she reads. She said she took it as an insult, as in "you're stupid, can you even read?"
Click to expand...
You believe that, or do you think she was confused as to what to say, like, if she said The New York Times then maybe she'd lose street cred with the reds? Or maybe Couric would follow up by asking who her favourite columnist was and she wouldn't be able to answer that so she just panicked. Her response was terror not indignity, that's just the way she played if off afterward to save face. IMHO.
 
speeds said:
You believe that, or do you think she was confused as to what to say, like, if she said The New York Times then maybe she'd lose street cred with the reds? Or maybe Couric would follow up by asking who her favourite columnist was and she wouldn't be able to answer that so she just panicked. Her response was terror not indignity, that's just the way she played if off afterward to save face. IMHO.
Click to expand...

I think she came across with Oprah as being at least able to name a few newspapers or whatever.
 
speeds said:
LOL! Yeah, now.
Click to expand...

I actually see her point.

Did she come across with Oprah as being president material? No. She demonstrates expertise at energy related matters and talking about her family.
 
ABM said:
I'm not going to spend the evening citing example after example, but, let's face it, the libs are afraid of Palin. And, I ask why? I mean, she ain't even in politics right now/ OK, she wrote a book. Big whoop. She's more of a novelty to me. Again, though, why the incredible interest by so many as to what she does? Especially if she's a stupid conservative bag of wind?
Click to expand...
why shouldn't Americans be afraid of having an idiot in charge? I realize some of are very interested in who is attractive looking, but I'd rather have the smart people calling the shots.

STOMP
 
STOMP said:
why shouldn't Americans be afraid of having an idiot in charge? I realize some of are very interested in who is attractive looking, but I'd rather have the smart people calling the shots.

STOMP
Click to expand...

maybe what you call smart is just the left media bias?:devilwink:
 
STOMP said:
why shouldn't Americans be afraid of having an idiot in charge? I realize some of are very interested in who is attractive looking, but I'd rather have the smart people calling the shots.

STOMP
Click to expand...


She said on Hannity that she's not interested in running the country. She's more interested in helping support others from the wings.
 
STOMP said:
why shouldn't Americans be afraid of having an idiot in charge? I realize some of are very interested in who is attractive looking, but I'd rather have the smart people calling the shots.

STOMP
Click to expand...

http://www.examiner.com/x-26908-Fai...1d19-Why-is-the-left-so-afraid-of-Sarah-Palin

I don’t know if Sarah Palin plans to run for another political office in her lifetime. My gut tells me that she won’t and she really doesn’t need too. The truth is that running for office wouldn’t give her any more influence over the attitudes and beliefs of the American electorate than she does already. I see her as more of a senior statesperson that serves as an ombudswoman to the Republican Party. Chances are good that the GOP will be back in control within the next few years and everyone knows that they have an uncanny ability to shoot themselves in the foot whenever in power.

Having someone like Sarah Palin to use her voice and growing influence to keep politicians accountable on behalf of Middle Americans would be more powerful of a position than the Presidency. I suspect that her book is just the beginning of the Palin era on national politics.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top