Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
heard he turned down at least 24 MM a year, for probably 5/6+ years is my guess
...^^^ if that's true, he's a greedy idiot. If they offered a 5/6 year extension he'd be 36 at the end of the contract. How much does he hope to get next year, and how much f'n money is enough?
...He had a career year last year and may not be nearly as good this year, plus there's always the possibility of injury...he's taking a big gamble IMO.
Going into last season he had a career mark of 52-42 & was given a 3M dollar raise after a good season. Last season was a career year & he was given a 9M dollar raise to 15M. And That's! not enough. Just ANOTHER greedy bastard. Yeah I'm with Messiah, I hope his arm falls off.
Yes, he gambled, no he's not greedy. The "greedy" tag is a little silly when talking about professional athletes. Baseball is a multi-billion dollar proposition, payroll is ownership's biggest expense. The players have a very limited window where they can command what the market deems their worth. These players have an obligation to fetch that when they can. If Scherzer can replicate the success of last season, there's no reason to believe he can't make Kershaw money. Scherzer netting a five year deal at the end of the season ends any mystery as to his intentions in this offseason. As for whether or not the Yanks pick him up, who comes off the books to make this work within the framework of the luxury tax? I know the Ghost of the Captain will go, but who else is up?
It's not. Greedy isn't the word for a man who has exactly one more year to command blockbuster money. And yes, if he plays as capably as last season he'll get Kershaw money. Barring catastrophic injury, even if he regresses slightly to considerably, he'll get paid what the Tigers offered him this season or slightly more on the open market. He gets to legitimately ask for this kind of money one more time, this is it, wring every dollar out of this opportunity, it's not coming again for a mid-30's front line starter.IF & only IF he can duplicate it, then you discuss the multi year contract. But to demand that kind of money after ONE career season. Please, greedy IS the right word.
Its not greed, he's making a calculated business decision. Its unfortunate that people toss around labels such greed in this instance. Only he can decide what is the right decision for him and his family. Not wanting to settle for a low ball offer not not make him greedy, rather I see the Tigers being cheap and manipulative. If you see greed, than that is your baggage, not Max's.
" wring every dollar out of this opportunity " = greed
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/greed
What would be your definition of greed. One great season does not entitle you to superstar status.MAYBE if he can come close to last seasons numbers he'll be a little more worthy. But HOLY SHIT! man you're offered a 9M dollar raise & he wants an 18M dollar raise. For ONE great season? Yeah GREED is definitely the right word.
" wring every dollar out of this opportunity " = greed
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/greed
What would be your definition of greed. One great season does not entitle you to superstar status.MAYBE if he can come close to last seasons numbers he'll be a little more worthy. But HOLY SHIT! man you're offered a 9M dollar raise & he wants an 18M dollar raise. For ONE great season? Yeah GREED is definitely the right word.
Its not greed, he's making a calculated business decision. Its unfortunate that people toss around labels such greed in this instance. Only he can decide what is the right decision for him and his family. Not wanting to settle for a low ball offer not not make him greedy, rather I see the Tigers being cheap and manipulative. If you see greed, than that is your baggage, not Max's.
...I didn't say anything about not wanting him in pinstripes, and I did say anything about how much money he will get. I said "he's a greedy idiot" for turning down the Tigers' offer if it was for "$24 Mil at 5-6 years".