Politics Senate Judiciary opens probe into Obama-era Russian nuclear bribery case

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
barfo said:
Sounds like he followed the proper procedure, doesn't it. Unlike, say, Flynn, who didn't ask permission and also lied about it later. Or Sessions, who lied about meeting Russians. Or Trump, who claimed he had no business in Russia at the same time his team was trying to arrange a huge deal there.

So yeah, Russia Russia Russia.

barfo
Click to expand...

No, it doesn't sound like he followed the proper procedure.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/04/politics/clinton-foundation-trump-foundation-filing-issues/index.html

Clinton Foundation had filing issues, too
 
Denny Crane said:
No, it doesn't sound like he followed the proper procedure.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/04/politics/clinton-foundation-trump-foundation-filing-issues/index.html

Clinton Foundation had filing issues, too
Click to expand...

In this story, the Clinton Foundation itself noticed that it hadn't filed some possibly-required documents, and then filed them.

Yes, they should have filed fully in the first place. But there is no evidence of wrongdoing presented.

Contrast that to the people you don't want to talk about failing to file documents and then lying about it when they were caught.

barfo
 
barfo said:
In this story, the Clinton Foundation itself noticed that it hadn't filed some possibly-required documents, and then filed them.

Yes, they should have filed fully in the first place. But there is no evidence of wrongdoing presented.

Contrast that to the people you don't want to talk about failing to file documents and then lying about it when they were caught.

barfo
Click to expand...

Sounds exactly what Flynn says.

Hypocrite.

The Clinton Foundation also promised to openly report any foreign contributions when the crook was Secy of State. This prove is already showing why - and it is wrongdoing.
 
Denny Crane said:
Sounds exactly what Flynn says.
Click to expand...

No, it doesn't. Flynn didn't self-report his omissions. Flynn got busted, and then filed. There is a difference.

Plus the fact that while the Clinton Foundation failed to file some supplementary material on their taxes, the information was freely available on their website all along. According to your link, anyway.

Flynn, on the other hand, failed to get required permission to take Russian money, took Russian money, failed to report taking Russian money, lied about it, etc.

Calling the two situations equivalent is dishonest.

barfo
 
barfo said:
No, it doesn't. Flynn didn't self-report his omissions. Flynn got busted, and then filed. There is a difference.

Plus the fact that while the Clinton Foundation failed to file some supplementary material on their taxes, the information was freely available on their website all along. According to your link, anyway.

Flynn, on the other hand, failed to get required permission to take Russian money, took Russian money, failed to report taking Russian money, lied about it, etc.

Calling the two situations equivalent is dishonest.

barfo
Click to expand...
LOL

Your candidate is so clearly criminal. It’s rather hilarious the extent you go to defend the indefensible.

I don’t defend Flynn.
 
Denny Crane said:
LOL

Your candidate is so clearly criminal. It’s rather hilarious the extent you go to defend the indefensible.

I don’t defend Flynn.
Click to expand...

So clearly criminal that she's never been charged with a crime. I guess if she's a criminal she's way smarter than her enemies such as yourself.

That, or your objectivity is lacking.

barfo
 
barfo said:
So clearly criminal that she's never been charged with a crime. I guess if she's a criminal she's way smarter than her enemies such as yourself.

That, or your objectivity is lacking.

barfo
Click to expand...
My objectivity says she’s under investigation by the FBI and congressional committee(s).

Where there’s smoke, eh?

:lol:
 
Denny Crane said:
My objectivity says she’s under investigation by the FBI and congressional committee(s).

Where there’s smoke, eh?

:lol:
Click to expand...

Oh, so that's the standard? You really want to have it both ways, don't you?

barfo
 
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...-acted-as-russian-spy-moved-closer-to-hillary

FBI watched, then acted as Russian spy moved closer to Hillary Clinton

Agents were surprised by the timing and size of a $500,000 check that a Kremlin-linked bank provided Bill Clinton with for a single speech in the summer of 2010. The payday came just weeks after Hillary Clinton helped arrange for American executives to travel to Moscow to support Putin’s efforts to build his own country’s version of Silicon Valley, agents said.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top