Serious question, not really

[LAZY]

Well. This question crossed my mind. Im not sure why. But, would men be gay without sports?

 

[yankshater213]

This is a legitimate question. I'd tend to say yes. Most guys that aren't into sports are in fact either 1) gay, 2) gothic, or 3) a combo.

 

[Pacers fan forever]

Yes. Because Jamaal Tinsley and Stephen Jackson wouldn't be able to afford to go to strip clubs.

 

[Rok]

Well can't some sports be classified as homoerotic? Serious though, I would think the answer is no. I don't think sexual preference is based on sports. But maybe I'm wrong. It's obviously not true with pacer fan forever.

 

[JesRey42390]

I don't think so. I feel that guys would have more time for their girls and then their lives would be a lot better.

 

[Lil BK]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>But, would men be gay without sports?</div>good question, I think some guys would, but me I would just stay at work and get overtime money

 

[HoNgKoNgKoBe]

I don't think so. Ya if there weren't sports to deal with and them wanting to try and go pro. They would have more time with friends, families and pay more attention to their girl friends. I have a few friends that aren't quite into sports and they are still straight.

 

[redneck]

No, there was actually a time in humanity before sports and humans weren't gay. Men would just invent something like Hunting or War to replace sports. both are manly activities.

 

[Justice]

Yes. In fact, I think it would be even more likely.

 

[Illosophee]

<span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">I only recently became a sports fan; strictly basketball, though. I wasn't gay nor intended on turning gay before I became a big-time NBA fan.Anyway, before sports were invented, men were gay. Look at the Greeks. They f*cked boys, for crying outloud! The only "sports" they had at the time were the Olympics, but nobody really considers any of the Olympic events as sporting events.</span>

 

[Nitro1118]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Illosophee @ Feb 9 2007, 10:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS">They f*cked boys, for crying outloud! .</span></div>People still F*ck boys.Anyway, being homosexual has nothing to do with sports. I actually think that, if anything, it would make you more gay with constant touching of other guys, being in locker room with other guys, etc...Naturally, men are attracted to the opposite sex, and if you are gay it is probably either some chemical imbalance or something happenning as you were raised/enviorment.

 

[KobeBryant_24]

naw maybe there to busy doing porn, with GIRLS, lol

 

[YarnIdge]

I don't think so. I had a friend hu didnt like sports but was straight. I kinda agree with nitro, bout sports not really havin anythin to do wif it. I mean there are gay pro ballers ya know.

 

[the_pestilence]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (redneck @ Feb 8 2007, 08:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No, there was actually a time in humanity before sports and humans weren't gay. Men would just invent something like Hunting or War to replace sports. both are manly activities.</div>And when was that? And what evidence do you have that people weren't gay back then?

 

[Clangus]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Rok @ Feb 9 2007, 01:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Well can't some sports be classified as homoerotic? Serious though, I would think the answer is no. I don't think sexual preference is based on sports. But maybe I'm wrong. It's obviously not true with pacer fan forever.</div>I agree and HAHAHAH pacersfan lol