MarAzul
LongShip
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2008
- Messages
- 21,370
- Likes
- 7,281
- Points
- 113
majority has spoken already
This is not true. Not one of your representatives in Congress has voted to remove MJ from the federal list of unlawful substances.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
majority has spoken already
Did pot ruin your tour in Nam or something?
What were you doing to them that they felt the need to smoke weed to forget your work?No. But I did lose several development programmers to the weed. About 9 as I recall. Just could not function any longer. Could not get a one of them to take substance abuse treatment either.
One could say the same thing about boat building or most anything you pursued though..take this guy and he's done what you've done...just really badly
View attachment 17798

I represent my country...I vote...it starts with you and me....One nation...you remember? Thought you wanted govt shrunken? Don't need them looking snoopin' around my neck of the woods....as to the status of plant...it's steamrolled into legality and with a 5.1 billion dollar industry in the wings in California alone....you can plant lettuce if you want to...this isn't going away any sooner than beerThis is not true. Not one of your representatives in Congress has voted to remove MJ from the federal list of unlawful substances.
ah that should have gotten a chuckle out of an old salt....
What were you doing to them that they felt the need to smoke weed to forget your work?
I represent my country
ah that should have gotten a chuckle out of an old salt....
Too far across that chasm.You don't remember this??
Deserve? I don't know, but I don't need to make the call. What I object to is sanctioning the practice as good, no harm. This is simply not true.
Legalization of something isn't the same as endorsing it.
barfo
9 out of 269? You're against marijuana legalization because 3.3% of people under your employ used it and their performance suffered? Like, your overall group productivity went down MAX 3.3%, and probably more like 2% and you're like "Yep, time to kill the devil herb. It's evil."Danged if I know! But the other 260 or so had no noticeable trouble.
sure....and I lobby for my issues...and vote...and watch the times change. If you're looking to dysfunctional leadership to solve the puzzle of the future...good luck with that. I say do what you can..own it..we talk here but the cannabis industry is big tax revenue and medicinally a better alternative to many pharmaceuticals ...it's a prohibition that's ending and Sessions is gaining nothing by challenging it's legality...it'll be on the books...took decades to get this far. I never thought I'd see it in my lifetime but I can say the same about the internetThat is quite a take, but I think your Senators and Congressmen are under the impression they make federal law.
9 out of 269? You're against marijuana legalization because 3.3% of people under your employ used it and their performance suffered? Like, your overall group productivity went down MAX 3.3%, and probably more like 2% and you're like "Yep, time to kill the devil herb. It's evil."
It has hundreds of uses that aren't in Easy Rider.....and you don't have to smoke it even if you want to partakeNo.
But I do remember, you flake the rope, not smoke it.
No.
I ask if it made anyone better or more efficient?
I have yet to find a reason to advocate the weed.
Sessions is gaining nothing by challenging it's legality
No one is asking you to advocate for it.
barfo
No.
I ask if it made anyone better or more efficient?
I have yet to find a reason to advocate the weed.
Visit a local children's cancer ward....go to a vet's PTSD therapy session...talk to a chronic insomniac....you seem to completely ignore the medicinal benefits because you knew some lazy people who smoked at work because...well...they were lazy....how many took a cigarette break every 5 minutes?I have yet to find a reason to advocate the weed.
A wise decision would be to shut the fuck up and smoke some weed instead but neither of us are doing that.A wise decision, don't you agree?
Why is efficiency the only measure you're looking at?
Well call me a statist then I guess because it's still legal here ...prohibition is over...all that's left is to dot the i's and cross the t's when more states have legalized it.....
It is illegal. I personally hate the stuff so I laugh at them because they're so MAD that the little goofy eared weirdo did this.He is not challenging anything. The weed is flat fucking illegal according to federal law. It will remain so until your congressmen act.

A wise decision would be to shut the fuck up and smoke some weed instead but neither of us are doing that.
Delusion, they just don't care.Ha!
Dang if I can tell which it is, head up ass, hope, or just uninformed.
It is illegal. I personally hate the stuff so I laugh at them because they're so MAD that the little goofy eared weirdo did this.
I don't really care one way or the other but once again it shows lib's lack of logical thinking. (Maybe it is the weed)
Taxing weed takes money from a lot of poor people. Money that began here and stays here. Illegal immigrants sending money earned here home takes money out of our economy and sends it South.
Just Mexicans were almost 70 billion dollars last year or the year before. Certainly they're not all illegally here but still.
I'll trade the liberals all the drugs legal that they want if they agree to deport everyone here illegally. Punish business that hires them, make e verify mandatory. Shit like that.
They don't want to because they just want to ignore any law they don't like. Weed, Immigration, guns....etc.
I just read river say it's legal. All they need is more states to vote for it and it's all good. Holy fuck. View attachment 17799
No. But I did lose several development programmers to the weed. About 9 as I recall. Just could not function any longer. Could not get a one of them to take substance abuse treatment either.