- Joined
- Jun 25, 2015
- Messages
- 60,612
- Likes
- 61,121
- Points
- 113
You've gone batty.
All because I shook a butcher's hand...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You've gone batty.
The writer quotes Shaquille saying he heard rumors a few teams are selling and one could move to Vegas. The writer then states San Antonio sold a minority share, and jumped to the assumption they will be moved to Vegas because the Spurs WNBA team the Stars moved there.
But then there aren’t 8 teams in a Midwest area division. That’s why I picked Minnesota. Memphis and NO are somewhat near Texas which makes sense keeping them in that division.But New Orleans is further East. It would make more sense
8 teams per division is a bit much in my opinion. I think 4-team divisions with 4 divisions per conference makes sense.I think they should just expand and add teams in Seattle and Vegas. Go back to 4 divisions. Only half of league makes playoffs.
They just need to expand to 32 if they want a team in Vegas. Give Seattle a team back too. Good for the league and fans would love it.I hate the idea of any team moving to another city, mostly because of how many rumors you always hear about the Blazers leaving Portland. But I know those are mostly made up rumors, and also if a city isn't supporting their team for shit, it's not as bad.
It's not sooo bad depending on whether or not the ownership has shit the bed (like they did in Seattle) or didn't try very hard to make a good go of things (Vancouver) or the owner was a dirt bag (original Hornets).
I don't think having 7 games out of market is a good idea.Make it 5 in division, and 2 vs each of the other 24 teams--83 games total. And each in-division series has one neutral-site game--meaning a total of 112 neutral-site games played each NBA season. Could finally serve some fans outside of the traditional markets.
In the Stern era, he spoke of adding a European Division. Can you imagine getting traded from Sacramento to London?I don't think having 7 games out of market is a good idea.
I'd just say have each team play 1 game internationally. That's 16 international games a year and it makes the home/road split even at 41/41.
The old Pacific Division in mid 90s had 8 teams: Lakers, Suns, Sonics, Clippers, Kings, Blazers, Warriors, Grizzlies.8 teams per division is a bit much in my opinion. I think 4-team divisions with 4 divisions per conference makes sense.
I'd say if you win your division you get a top 7 seed. 8 (H) vs. 9 (A) play-in game for the Final Spot.
I'm bored so I'll even list them out, with this years division winners in bold:
Northwest - Portland Trail Blazers, Seattle Supersonics, Sacramento Kings, Utah Jazz
Southwest - Golden State Warriors, Los Angeles Clippers, Los Angeles Lakers, Las Vegas ???
Central - Phoenix Suns, Denver Nuggets, Oklahoma City Thunder, Memphis Grizzlies
South - Houston Rockets, Dallas Mavericks, San Antonio Spurs, New Orleans Pelicans
Midwest - Minnesota Timberwolves, Milwaukee Bucks, Chicago Bulls, Indiana Pacers
Northeast - Toronto Raptors, Cleveland Cavaliers, Detroit Pistons, Washington Wizards
Atlantic - Boston Celtics, New York Knicks, Brooklyn Nets, Philadelphia 76ers
Sourtheast - Miami Heat, Olrando Magic, Atlanta Hawks, Charlotte Hornets
5 games against divisional opponents (15 total)
3 games against other conference opponents (36 total)
2 games against out of conference opponents (32 total)
Adds up to 83. Have each team play 1 international game a year, with an even 41/41 split of games.
Actually, Grizzlies were in the other division but Central Division had 8 teams.
1996-97 NBA Standings
Wouldn't know how to feel about that haha. The logistics of that seem super messy. It'd be cool but it'd be difficult to pull off.In the Stern era, he spoke of adding a European Division. Can you imagine getting traded from Sacramento to London?
8-team divisions with the winners not being guaranteed anything? Whats the point of divisions at that point? At least now it separates teams a little more.I like the idea of two 8-team divisions. I liked the old Pacific, Midwest, Atlantic and Central. I personally would rather division winners aren't guaranteed anything seeding-wise, but I could accept the two division winners automatically being the top two seeds.
8-team divisions with the winners not being guaranteed anything? Whats the point of divisions at that point? At least now it separates teams a little more.
