Sharpe is open

[Idog1976]

I don’t think you necessarily need to trade Ant to start Sharpe. Right now, we could start Sharpe and bring Hart off the bench. Sub Hart in for Ant early. Or, whoever between Ant and Sharpe is hot, sub out Hart for the other.

Yup. Start Sharpe or at a minimum, give him starter minutes and touches.

 

[BankTeller]

Yup. Start Sharpe or at a minimum, give him starter minutes and touches.

I don’t think you need to give him starter-minutes, but I think we should give him starter-like-touches in reserve-minutes.

When he’s playing this efficient, idk why he shouldn’t get 10 shots and almost a guaranteed 10 points at a minimum. Even when he doesn’t get a dunk, he gets fouled.

Sharpe has started 4 games already. Seeing as how load managing players, he’s going to get plenty of chances to start the rest of the year. Good chance he’ll start in at least 15. I’ll take that.

I assume any Hart trade would signal Sharpe entering the starting lineup as a full time starter though.

 

[mook]

I'd really like Billups to answer the question, "Hart logged 30 minutes against the Nets. He had 6 boards and 7 points, and the opponent was noticeably sagging off him to cover Dame. What did he bring to the game that made you play him 50% more minutes than Sharpe, who seemed unguardable as he shot 7-9 and went for 20? Why was Hart the better choice to close out the game?"

I get team chemistry. But if Nurk can ride the pine because Eubanks is completely outplaying him, so can Hart when Sharpe is clearly the superior option.

 

[SIeepwalker]

Simons went 1 on 3, missed, then Brooklyn went on their run.
Sharpe was 3/3 on threes at that point.