Politics Shepard Smith, Fox News veteran anchor and frequent Trump target, abruptly resigns from the network

[Hoopguru]

lol, I'm being somewhat facetious obviously, but it's not that super hard to look for multiple sources, research and then find a youtube video of what people actually said w/o commentary. I certainly wouldn't take Judicial Watch, or Fox or CNN at their word just cause they said so... It's easy enough to go to find more information. That doesn't mean that I always end up in the right place, that would be awfully arrogant, but I certainly try to inform myself even if I don't really know who these "famous" people are.

Beautifully said!

 

[Lanny]

The Chief Anchor and head of news at the world's largest and by far the most popular cable news network?

Never heard of him?

Yep, never heard of him. Of course, I don't watch tripe.

 

[Lanny]

If you have better sources of factual, up to the minute news on a world-wide scale please share where you "get informed" so we can all get up to speed with you.

PBS, CNN, NBC and MSNBC.
The News Hour;
Washington Week;
Faried Zakaria's The Global Public Square;
Meet the Press;
Chris Matthew's Hardball;
Chris Hays' All In;
KATU's 11 PM local news.

And then there's the myriad of internet sources when I research subjects which includes NY Times, Washington Post, AP, Reuters and a host of other credible sources.

 

[e_blazer]

PBS, CNN, NBC and MSNBC.
The News Hour;
Washington Week;
Faried Zakaria's The Global Public Square;
Meet the Press;
Chris Matthew's Hardball;
Chris Hays' All In;
KATU's 11 PM local news.

And then there's the myriad of internet sources when I research subjects which includes NY Times, Washington Post, AP, Reuters and a host of other credible sources.

 

[theprunetang]

I mostly agree with this, but have to question the entire graph after seeing that Breitbart isn't entirely in the "garbage right" section. Should be off the page.

 

[barfo]

Yeah, I'm not sure about that graph. Would be interesting to know whether they were attempting to rank just on hard news coverage, or overall content.

barfo

 

[e_blazer]

I mostly agree with this, but have to question the entire graph after seeing that Breitbart isn't entirely in the "garbage right" section. Should be off the page.

They have it in about the same spot as Buzz Feed on the left. Is there a significant difference? I don’t partake of either swill so I can’t comment. Quibbles aside over a few outlets, it seems pretty close to me.

 

[theprunetang]

They have it in about the same spot as Buzz Feed on the left. Is there a significant difference? I don’t partake of either swill so I can’t comment. Quibbles aside over a few outlets, it seems pretty close to me.

Buzzfeed should be off the page to the left as well. Haha

Both equally terrible.

 

[MARIS61]

I already told you where it's at, if you're looking with help using the internet there are probably youtube tutorials.

No, you did not. You said the internet, which could mean you get all your information from me. But that's okay if you're embarrassed to say.

"The internet" is not a source. In fact, the majority of information on the internet comes through a zillion false-fronts run by the exact networks you named. The idea that there's some website you can trust to tell the truth all the time without bias is naïve.

 

[MARIS61]

PBS, CNN, NBC and MSNBC.
The News Hour;
Washington Week;
Faried Zakaria's The Global Public Square;
Meet the Press;
Chris Matthew's Hardball;
Chris Hays' All In;
KATU's 11 PM local news.

And then there's the myriad of internet sources when I research subjects which includes NY Times, Washington Post, AP, Reuters and a host of other credible sources.

So only far-left, Deep State viewpoints, nothing else?

 

[TorturedBlazerFan]

No, you did not. You said the internet, which could mean you get all your information from me. But that's okay if you're embarrassed to say.

"The internet" is not a source. In fact, the majority of information on the internet comes through a zillion false-fronts run by the exact networks you named. The idea that there's some website you can trust to tell the truth all the time without bias is naïve.

Did I claim there was one website that was always right all the time.

 

[Lanny]

1. The only one clearly on my list is the NY Post which is mislabeled as lower high quality publication yet it has more Pulitzer prizes than any other news source. So, why are you listing my post as the one this responds to?
2. Where is that rag Breitbart? Whoops, I see it at the bottom of the mixed quality list identified in tiny print. Also, where is the Washington Times?

 

[barfo]

You said the internet, which could mean you get all your information from me. But that's okay if you're embarrassed to say.

That certainly would be embarrassing!

barfo

 

[ABM]

I had no idea all this was happening over there @ Fox....

 

[e_blazer]

I had no idea all this was happening over there @ Fox....

I feel dirty for having clicked on that link. I’ll no doubt pay for it by hacking my YouTube feed filled up with similar crap.

 

[ABM]

I feel dirty for having clicked on that link. I’ll no doubt pay for it by hacking my YouTube feed filled up with similar crap.

Sorry. I hope that's not the case.

 

[ABM]

Shepard Smith is a wuss. He just wanted to present the news straight-up. Just ask Don Lemon.

 

[MarAzul]

Smith covers a hurricane pretty well. Most news pretty straight. Anything close to a political side to it, and the Democrat becomes apparent, mostly in the facial signals. Rather like Ted Baxter getting a little up tight.

 

[MarAzul]

Shepard Smith is a wuss. He just wanted to present the news straight-up. Just ask Don Lemon.

I expect to see him on CNN soon. Doing the Wolfblitzer, with a Lemon twist.

 

[ABM]

I expect to see him on CNN soon. Doing the Wolfblitzer, with a Lemon twist.

Hahahaha!