Labinot41
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2017
- Messages
- 9,328
- Likes
- 8,953
- Points
- 113
1st embiid didn't played in that Game. 2nd that was 1 year ago!Nurkic put up 28 points and 20 boards last March against Embid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1st embiid didn't played in that Game. 2nd that was 1 year ago!Nurkic put up 28 points and 20 boards last March against Embid.
And he did it again last game we played. I mean come on man, we know you have it out against him but even you can see he is a good player to have on the team.1st embiid didn't played in that Game. 2nd that was 1 year ago!
1st embiid didn't played in that Game. 2nd that was 1 year ago!
Did anyone come up with a structure?Whomever came up with the first structure for Nurk's workout needs to be demoted at the very least.
Nurk rushes. Zach takes the time to set up a move. The difference is striking. Nurk will get there.The good thing about Nurk's weaknesses this year is they are easily fixable. It's not like he has a bad feel for the game, or has low BBIQ, or is too small for the position, or has a broken shot........his biggest problems come when he forces or rushes a pass or a shot.
Nurk rushes. Zach takes the time to set up a move. The difference is striking. Nurk will get there.
And he did it again last game we played. I mean come on man, we know you have it out against him but even you can see he is a good player to have on the team.
Sorry if my post was ambiguous. I didn't mean last time vs Embid. I mean his (Nurkic's) last game period.Um no.. Why are we trying to revise history?? Nurk SUCKED in the first game and we lost... Embiid destroyed Nurk in a game we lost by 20 points and Nurk was a -18 with 6 turnovers.
View attachment 19435
VS
View attachment 19436
Now, in game 2 he played A LOT better, and YES Embiid did play and we beat them without Dame:
View attachment 19438
VS
View attachment 19437
People here don't want to hear that. They think 5 good Games in 67 Games is enoughIn closing:
Let's not act like Nurk has had good shooting nights VS Embiid. That has never happened.
People here don't want to hear that. They think 5 good Games in 67 Games is enough

Um no.. Why are we trying to revise history?? Nurk SUCKED in the first game and we lost... Embiid destroyed Nurk in a game we lost by 20 points and Nurk was a -18 with 6 turnovers.
View attachment 19435
VS
View attachment 19436
Now, in game 2 he played A LOT better, and YES Embiid did play and we beat them without Dame:
View attachment 19438
VS
View attachment 19437
I remember Embiid looking soft the second game against Nurk.
To the point Philly fans, and Embiid were crying about Nurk being too physical.
Didn't Embiid get a tech this game because he flopped?
3 shots in the paint the whole game, and one of those came against Davis.
3 desperation threes late when the game was pretty much out of reach.
#CenteroftheFuture
Some stats for you. But first, a primer.People here don't want to hear that. They think 5 good Games in 67 Games is enough
Game score is a metric developed by basketball statistician John Hollinger as an extension of Player Efficiency Rating (as well as a simpler alternative). It is intended to give a “total perspective” on a player’s statistical performance in a basketball game, taking into account every statistic listed on a player’s box score. Game score is intended to be used for a single game, and represent a parallel number but alternative to points scored – 40 being a fantastic game score, and 10 an average performance.
No, I can't.
Sign Nurk for 11 mil. or see ya, whatever. His potential and youth are worth way more in todays NBA. To me, he's a MUST re-sign. But it ain't happening for 11 mil/per. I say see ya to the dude who wrote the article. Plus Collins is NOT A CENTER. His greatest upside for the future is at PF.No, I can't.
You can't fix stupid.
Plus Collins is NOT A CENTER. His greatest upside for the future is at PF.
How many teams with good traditional centers made it out of the first round in the playoffs? 3 out of 8 (Embiid/Sixers, Capela/Rockets and Gobert/Utah). You could probably argue for Aldridge in SA as well, at this point in his career.
How many made the Conference Finals? 1 out of 4. (Capela).
How many made the Finals? 0.
How many in the past 7 seasons have won a championship? 1 (Duncan/Spurs 2013)
The Warriors have 4 centers on their roster (West, McGee, Jones, Pachulia). They basically don't use any of them in the playoffs.
The league really has changed a lot. Teams are generally going to view Nurk as a cog you can use in situations, but not a cornerstone.
Is he even worth as much as a decent (but not great) 3 and D swing man? On a team that wants to win a championship, not really. Maybe for a team like the Nets who just wants to win a few more games and sell some tickets.
He probably has more value to us than anybody else because our back court defense is so limited. But shit, we just got swept in the first round, and we only used him 23 mpg. He's still young and improving, but when you get down to it it's tough to play him against a small ball team in a series. The other team has lots of time to adapt to what he can and can't do.
Uhhh, no they haven't? They've just said they want him closer to the hoop, that's it.Zach Lowe and Casey Holdahl have both implied that the front office views Zach as the franchise center going forward and I have no reason to believe that’s incorrect. I think what’s more likely is we resign him to a qualifying offer this year or try and get him on a cheaper long term deal and then deal him for some other piece once Collins proves he’s ready.
