Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree with others in here who have maintained that we need a (1.5%?, 2%%, or...) national sales tax to be directly applied to the nation debt. That, coupled with a decrease in government spending with periodic verification checkpoints of some kind.
I wonder what the difference would be in a sales tax vs a tax "hike" for those who make over 250K a year. As in, would you spend more in a "sales tax" then you would in the proposed tax increase.
I wonder what the difference would be in a sales tax vs a tax "hike" for those who make over 250K a year. As in, would you spend more in a "sales tax" then you would in the proposed tax increase.

The good news about a sales tax is that it's "directly" relative to the spending of those across the economic spectrum.
The good news about a sales tax is that it's "directly" relative to the spending of those across the economic spectrum.
I wonder what the difference would be in a sales tax vs a tax "hike" for those who make over 250K a year. As in, would you spend more in a "sales tax" then you would in the proposed tax increase.
You really don't see a difference?
So the single mom cost to feed her kids goes up. Retired people living on social security would can barely pay for prescription medication would have to pay more for their medication.
I like the idea of increasing income tax on those making over $250K over a national sales tax.
I wonder what the difference would be in a sales tax vs a tax "hike" for those who make over 250K a year. As in, would you spend more in a "sales tax" then you would in the proposed tax increase.
so you guys currently have no Goods & Services Tax (GST) or VAT etc of any kind?
That's a pleasant fiction. I'd be interested in your analysis of Chart II on this page (wish I could link the chart).See, governments like yours (New Zealand) subsidize many services. The US doesn't. You can easily find fat to cut, but we can't. The US has chosen to put its money into military and espionage might, not into the needs of the people. The only things left to cut, the cuts Republicans want, will kill or shorten the lives of almost all of us.
I said I wonder what the difference would be, not that I don't see a difference.
Let me guess. You make less than $250K annually?
That's a pleasant fiction. I'd be interested in your analysis of Chart II on this page (wish I could link the chart).
im not sure what you are trying to say here...that we dont spend alot on defense?
![]()
![]()
1 $928.5 billion in defense spending
2 $898 billion in health care expenditures
3 $787.6 billion in pensions
4 $464.6 billion in welfare spending
5 $250.7 billion on interest payments
6 $151.4 billion in other spending including basic research
7 $140.9 billion for education
8 $104.2 billion for transportation
9 $57.3 billion in protective services such as police, fire, law courts
10 $29 billion in general government expenses
![]()
Other mandatory, defense, and discretionary spending add up to only slightly more than the deficit. What's left to cut?
"(drug dealers) make a lot of money, but we spend a lot of money, too"
LOL. Was that Sprewell?
So do a decided majority of Americans. Polls have consistently favored raising taxes on the rich (or just letting the "Bush" tax cuts expire)/returning the income tax levels to where they'd been, closing tax loopholes, AND cutting spending. But our government officials on both sides of the aisle are bought and paid for by the same rich people, so understandably thats been off the table. So has cutting military spending.So the single mom cost to feed her kids goes up. Retired people living on social security would can barely pay for prescription medication would have to pay more for their medication.
I like the idea of increasing income tax on those making over $250K over a national sales tax.
are americans for raising taxes to pay off the deficit?
are americans for cutting military spending?Ewing
