So, now what?

[Denny Crane]

It's simply not true that it went from 1.1 to 2.1. You are comparing civilian employees to total employees. The correct comparison (assuming the numbers in your link are valid, which is questionable since it's the Washington Times) is 1.43 to 1.1. Not 2.15 to 1.1.



Huh? Who said anything about firing postal workers? Or are you trying to change the subject?

barfo

Your link includes postal workers and military. That's where postal workers came into the discussion.

When they (Times) say Defense sector, I don't think they're talking about Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines. Wikipedia says there are ~1.5M of those.

I think they're talking about these folks (among others):

http://www.cpms.osd.mil/

http://www.cpms.osd.mil/cpms_divisions.aspx

 

[Denny Crane]

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...87042.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTWhatsNewsCollection

WASHINGTON—A White House commission laid out a sweeping plan to cut the federal budget deficit by hundreds of billions a year by targeting sacrosanct areas of U.S. tax and spending policy, such as Social Security benefits, middle-class tax breaks and defense spending.

Among the controversial proposals, the plan in its current form would end or cap a wide range of breaks relied on by the middle class, including the deduction for home-mortgage interest. It would tax capital gains and dividends at the higher rates now levied on wage income. To compensate, one version of the plan would dramatically lower and simplify individual rates, to 9%, 15% and 24%.

For businesses, the plan would significantly lower the corporate tax rate—from a current top rate of 35% to as low as 26%—but also eliminate a number of deductions. It would make permanent the research and development tax credit. Overall, the plan would cut the federal deficit by $3.8 trillion by 2020.