Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't think it is in the best interest of any party. Unless Greg thinks he will end up playing only a few games this season he has to stick it out and wait. I'm sure Blazers would consider signing him right now to something like $7M/year, but G.O. probably wants to see what he is really worth. I'm sure he is optimistic about his chances--whether it is rational or not.
There is no chance to take. The difference between paying him now and paying him later, is at worse a few million a year. A few million a year I would gladly have tacked on to the Blazers salary cap to ensure they are signing a healthy player rather than hamstringing the club for the next 5 years.
If he's a RFA, wonder if anyone is going to do a toxic offer to fuck portland over.
At worse a few? I disagree. If he's healthy for 55 games at the end of this season, and plays like he has when healthy, guaranteed someone is offering him a max deal. If you could somehow get him for the deal pinwheel mentioned, versus a max deal, that's a significant difference. A risk? Sure. I'd take it, just the same.

I agree, I heard a quote from the agent that they wouldn't even be asking management about an extension as it is obvious for someone that even missed his entire first year, most players would have at least had that season under their belts before talking "worth", as where it was almost like a "red shirt" year for Oden. So you wouldn't know his worth until you see what you get out of him this season (which is when most teams would know what they're getting out of their rookies by re-signing time).
I'm assuming it would be identical to Blake Griffin. You won't see the Clips even mention re-signing him, even if he plays uninjured from here on out. He missed a year and the business practice is to wait until you've seen a player play out that normal tenure of time before you re-sign.
