So the obummercare! oooo, it's a devil in our government!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Further

Guy
Joined
Sep 20, 2008
Messages
11,099
Likes
4,039
Points
113
And then that there are evil and tempting with great fire and blackness of heart our healthcare system is being too open and may end up helping people who have no right to receive assistance. Obummer! you and your family should march out to the real murica and see what type of internment camps you are setting up!

liberals with no god and hating all things red white n blue are destroying murica.
 
When obummer made this law he obviously didn't take into account the good name of Hitler he would be dragging through the mud.
 
When obummer made this law he obviously didn't take into account the good name of Hitler he would be dragging through the mud.

Exactly!!! Repped.

Doctors fix gunshot wounds, not healthcare!!!!!!!!
 
And then that there are evil and tempting with great fire and blackness of heart our healthcare system is being too open and may end up helping people who have no right to receive assistance. Obummer! you and your family should march out to the real murica and see what type of internment camps you are setting up!

liberals with no god and hating all things red white n blue are destroying murica.

I surrendered to the temptation to give one of your posts a fair evaluation, regardless of how I feel towards you on a personal level. I see that I made a mistake. Must resist the "View post " option on the ignore feature.
 
I surrendered to the temptation to give one of your posts a fair evaluation, regardless of how I feel towards you on a personal level. I see that I made a mistake. Must resist the "View post " option on the ignore feature.

You really have Further on ignore? He's funny and his heart is in the right place. His cold liberal jewish heart.
 
This has Jew vs hitler written all over it! Obama is the antichrist!
 
Obama is the antichrist!

Nonsense. Obama reaches into the antichrist's chest cavity, pulls out his lungs, and butters his toast with them. Antichrist aint no match for Obama.

barfo
 
You really have Further on ignore? He's funny and his heart is in the right place. His cold liberal jewish heart.

yeah, I do. After all the time here, he flies solo on that honor. His heart may be in the right place, but his posts make me think his brain is somewhere else. The time I have had him on ignore, I have not subjected my self to his "reasoning" , I take a chance, and look what I find..priceless.
 
Nonsense. Obama reaches into the antichrist's chest cavity, pulls out his lungs, and butters his toast with them. Antichrist aint no match for Obama.

barfo

Yes, even the devil himself couldn't ruin a country as badly as Obama
 
True. Obama is too stupid to know his

If his goal is to ruin the country, and he's succeeding, then I guess his limitations are no factor.

barfo
 
Obama is a practitioner of the dark arts amirite?
 
If his goal is to ruin the country, and he's succeeding, then I guess his limitations are no factor.

barfo

That's the issue. He actually thinks he's doing good and having sheep like you support him.
 
That's the issue. He actually thinks he's doing good and having sheep like you support him.

You mean that sheep like me aren't really supporting him? He just thinks so?

barfo
 
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=1006050209041

The Emperor's New Clothes is a Danish fairy tale written by Hans Christian Andersen and first published in 1837, as part of Eventyr, Fortalte for Born (Fairy Tales, Told for Children). It was originally known as Keiserens Nye Klæder.

Plot synopsis
Many years ago there lived an emperor who cared only about his clothes and about showing them off. One day he heard from two swindlers that they could make the finest suit of clothes from the most beautiful cloth. This cloth, they said, also had the special capability that it was invisible to anyone who was either stupid or not fit for his position.

Being a bit nervous about whether he himself would be able to see the cloth, the emperor first sent two of his trusted men to see it. Of course, neither would admit that they could not see the cloth and so praised it. All the townspeople had also heard of the cloth and were interested to learn how stupid their neighbors were.

The emperor then allowed himself to be dressed in the clothes for a procession through town, never admitting that he was too unfit and stupid to see what he was wearing. For he was afraid that the other people would think that he was stupid.

Of course, all the townspeople wildly praised the magnificent clothes of the emperor, afraid to admit that they could not see them, until a small child said:

"But he has nothing on"!

This was whispered from person to person until everyone in the crowd was shouting that the emperor had nothing on. The emperor heard it and felt that they were correct, but held his head high and finished the procession.

Origins
It has been claimed that Andersen's original source was a Spanish story recorded by Don Juan Manuel (1282-1348).

Analysis
This story of the little boy puncturing the pretensions of the emperor's court has parallels from other cultures, categorized as Aarne-Thompson folktale type 1620.

The expressions The Emperor's new clothes and The Emperor has no clothes are often used with allusion to Andersen's tale. Most frequently, the metaphor involves a situation wherein the overwhelming (usually unempowered) majority of observers willingly share in a collective ignorance of an obvious fact, despite individually recognising the absurdity.. A similar twentieth-century metaphor is the Elephant in the room.

The story is also used to express a concept of "truth seen by the eyes of a child", an idea that truth is often spoken by a person too naïve to understand group pressures to see contrary to the obvious. This is a general theme of "purity within innocence" throughout Andersen's fables and many similar works of literature.

"The Emperor Wears No Clothes" or "The Emperor Has No Clothes" is often used in political and social contexts for any obvious truth denied by the majority despite the evidence of their eyes, especially when proclaimed by the government. . Amazon.com alone lists 17 works with one of these two phrases in the title, and this ignores political magazine articles and non-mainstream authors
 
I wonder why it is that we seem to feel the need to justify our opinions by vilifying those who hold the opposite opinion, or perhaps those who even have some valid concerns about something as impactful as Obamacare. Maybe that wasn't Further's intent here...perhaps he was just being funny or trying to make a point via satire. Whatever the case may be, I think that we're increasingly seeing this dynamic played out in our discussion of politics and religion. If you don't think that the ACA is a great thing for the country, you must be one of those inbred rednecks who wants poor people to die in the streets because they can't get basic health care. If you support the ACA, you're all about building an entitlement society and income redistribution...taking it from those nasty one-percenters and giving to the poor. Man, how about for once just realizing that both sides have some legitimate points to make and that, while the vision of what needs to be done may vary in the extreme, most people are really about wanting things to be better.

Okay, I'll climb down off of my soapbox now. Carry on as usual.
 
I wonder why it is that we seem to feel the need to justify our opinions by vilifying those who hold the opposite opinion, or perhaps those who even have some valid concerns about something as impactful as Obamacare. Maybe that wasn't Further's intent here...perhaps he was just being funny or trying to make a point via satire. Whatever the case may be, I think that we're increasingly seeing this dynamic played out in our discussion of politics and religion. If you don't think that the ACA is a great thing for the country, you must be one of those inbred rednecks who wants poor people to die in the streets because they can't get basic health care. If you support the ACA, you're all about building an entitlement society and income redistribution...taking it from those nasty one-percenters and giving to the poor. Man, how about for once just realizing that both sides have some legitimate points to make and that, while the vision of what needs to be done may vary in the extreme, most people are really about wanting things to be better.

Okay, I'll climb down off of my soapbox now. Carry on as usual.

No the concept is sound. The process that Obama is using is just unconstitutional. A villain? Nah Obama doesn't need anyone to dig up mud. I mean he's doing an awesome job all by himself.
 
I agree with SPD that Further is one of our brightest posters, and an all around good guy.

Barfo is a good guy, too. No matter what everyone else says about him.
 
Pay attention... You = sheep, supporting = stupid Obama, that thinks Obama is doing a good job

Oh... I had no idea that was what you were trying to say. Now I'm wounded, deeply wounded.

:smiley-placko:

barfo
 
The process that Obama is using is just unconstitutional.

The supreme court disagrees with you.

But I'm sure your legal credentials trump theirs?

barfo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top