Jade Falcon
Just to piss you off.
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2014
- Messages
- 11,492
- Likes
- 10,015
- Points
- 113
She was addressing meeting up with Marzy when he goes to San Fran.
Ah, got it, thank you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She was addressing meeting up with Marzy when he goes to San Fran.
She was addressing meeting up with Marzy when he goes to San Fran.
But they have to at least support my equal civil rights.
Can't be the case Sly. I fully support civil rights, yours, mine, and hers. Every other US citizen for that matter.
Would you say you support every citizen's civil rights as much as Jeff Sessions does?
Housing is expensive around here not because wages are high (there are a lot of low-medium income people) but simply because demand outstrips supply. Due to high employment, if not high wages. High employment is a good thing, of course, but cities did not plan well for growth, building housing is not as profitable as other structures, and there are so many people looking landlords and real estate can jack up prices because SOMEONE will have enough money to pay.
Anyone who says I am not entitled to the same rights they have does not support full civil rights.
While this is true in general, the situation is worse specifically in SF is the building restrictions that disapprove of high-rises in the city zone regulations. Basically, San Francisco is limited in where it can expand, for all practical purposes, it can only expand vertically, but the zoning regulations do not allow this.
California is a massive bubble of stupidity. Its only a matter of time where it all catches up, and the US will have to bail it out eventually.
Yes, but their really need some more dams built. Another up Coyote creek would have cost less than the flood last week.
Geez when the water comes, their don't save it. When the drought comes, the bitch like hell about climate change.
The real problem is their populations has doubled since the last dams were built, and they are afraid of those.
This is somewhat similar to Portland, but Portland's high rent is largely self inflicted. San Francisco is constrained by geography. Virtually all available land on the peninsula has been developed. Portland has the Urban Growth Boundary, which artificially (to a point) increases property values by limiting growth/development. The shortage of available properties has lead to bidding wars for virtually every residential property that comes up for sale. And "larger" inner city lots are being carved up so more house can be shoehorned in. Buyers don't care about yards and privacy, so long as they can live in Portland. We have plenty of room to sprawl if we want to destroy prime farmland and encourage housing developments to spread from Portland to Eugene....and beyond. Fortunately, our "blue" majority has stopped that from happening so far. But the pilgrims from (especially) California certainly haven't helped the situation, as @riverman has pointed out. Now, because they can't find housing in Portland, they're skewing the real estate market in the areas surrounding Portland (and is why @Jade Falcon's rent has skyrocketed....and property values in formerly affordable Vancouver have taken off). To really illustrate just how bad it is becoming, property buyers have actually begun to focus on Salem, after years of ignoring it and/or pretending it didn't exist (not hard to do). Property values there have started to significantly increase and there appears to be no end in sight. And it's only going to get worse in the Willamette Valley as more and more climate change refugees make their way here. Of course, these refugees (and some of you think foreign refugees are a plague!) are the folks who will help destroy the UGB and our already waning quality of life eventually.....I was born and raised in Portland, but, all it's charms aside, it ain't what it used to be and never will be again.....While this is true in general, the situation is worse specifically in SF is the building restrictions that disapprove of high-rises in the city zone regulations. Basically, San Francisco is limited in where it can expand, for all practical purposes, it can only expand vertically, but the zoning regulations do not allow this.
There are many beautiful places there.
This is somewhat similar to Portland, but Portland's high rent is largely self inflicted. San Francisco is constrained by geography. Virtually all available land on the peninsula has been developed. Portland has the Urban Growth Boundary, which artificially (to a point) increases property values by limiting growth/development. The shortage of available properties has lead to bidding wars for virtually every residential property that comes up for sale. And "larger" inner city lots are being carved up so more house can be shoehorned in. Buyers don't care about yards and privacy, so long as they can live in Portland. We have plenty of room to sprawl if we want to destroy prime farmland and encourage housing developments to spread from Portland to Eugene....and beyond. Fortunately, our "blue" majority has stopped that from happening so far. But the pilgrims from (especially) California certainly haven't helped the situation, as @riverman has pointed out. Now, because they can't find housing in Portland, they're skewing the real estate market in the areas surrounding Portland (and is why @Jade Falcon's rent has skyrocketed....and property values in formerly affordable Vancouver have taken off). To really illustrate just how bad it is becoming, property buyers have actually begun to focus on Salem, after years of ignoring it and/or pretending it didn't exist (not hard to do). Property values there have started to significantly increase and there appears to be no end in sight. And it's only going to get worse in the Willamette Valley as more and more climate change refugees make their way here. Of course, these refugees (and some of you think foreign refugees are a plague!) are the folks who will help destroy the UGB and our already waning quality of life eventually.....I was born and raised in Portland, but, all it's charms aside, it ain't what it used to be and never will be again.....
Yes, but they really need some more dams built. Another up Coyote creek would have cost less than the flood last week.
Geez when the water comes, they don't save it. When the drought comes, the bitch like hell about climate change.
The real problem is their populations has doubled since the last dams were built, and they are afraid of those.
They don't need more dams. Everyone built reservoirs in their backyards.
California is so goddamn stupid. This sounds JUST like a typical California problem too.
Christ. How do people live there? It's no wonder people are moving away. The problem is, they take this same dumbass mentality with them that got them regulated out of California in the first place.
Right, Andalusian, but housing is tight in the entire area, SF, peninsula, East Bay from Richmond Bridge to Livermore. And traffic getting worse as people have to drive farther and BART is way over capacity.
California is a massive bubble of stupidity. Its only a matter of time where it all catches up, and the US will have to bail it out eventually.
This is somewhat similar to Portland, but Portland's high rent is largely self inflicted. San Francisco is constrained by geography. Virtually all available land on the peninsula has been developed. Portland has the Urban Growth Boundary, which artificially (to a point) increases property values by limiting growth/development.
"Facts" are debatable. We are in a fraudulent economy. Once the bubble pops, all will be revealed.
I agree. But I am surprised you would know.
Facts are never debatable. They are binary. They are either true or not. This is why they are facts.
The state's GDP growth has out-stripped just about any other state in the country. It is a fact. The deficit that was inherited from the Arnold area has mostly been eliminated (from over 20B in '11-'12 to actually being in the black in the last 3 years, although they are estimating a deficit in the upcoming year without some budget changes (nowhere near as bad as it was in the Arnold time).
You can argue that the financial stability California had in the last years will not continue - this is an argument that can be made, but facts are facts.
That's fucking hilariousYou clap for sizzling fajitas.
