Politics Source: Comey to testify publicly about Trump confrontations

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

SlyPokerDog

Woof!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Messages
126,740
Likes
147,348
Points
115
(CNN)Fired FBI director James Comey plans to testify publicly in the Senate as early as next week to confirm bombshell accusations that President Donald Trump pressured him to end his investigation into a top Trump aide's ties to Russia, a source close to the issue said Wednesday.

Final details are still being worked out and no official date for his testimony has been set. Comey is expected to appear before the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is investigating possible connections between the Trump campaign and Russia during last year's presidential election.

Comey has spoken privately with Special Counsel Robert Mueller III to work out the parameters for his testimony to ensure there are no legal entanglements as a result of his public account, a source said. Comey will likely sit down with Mueller, a longtime colleague at the Justice Department, for a formal interview only after his public testimony.

When he testifies, Comey is unlikely to be willing to discuss in any detail the FBI's investigation into the charges of possible collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign -- the centerpiece of the probe, this source said. But he appears eager to discuss his tense interactions with Trump before his firing, which have now spurred allegations that the president may have tried to obstruct the investigation. If it happens, Comey's public testimony promises to be a dramatic chapter in the months-long controversy, and it will likely bring even more intense scrutiny to an investigation that Trump has repeatedly denounced as a "witch hunt."

The appointment of Mueller as a special counsel in the Russia investigation had raised concerns among some members of Congress that his probe could scuttle the chance for Congress and the public to hear directly from Comey. That appears less likely now that Mueller and Comey have discussed the limits of his testimony.

Since his firing last month, dramatic accounts have emerged in the New York Times, CNN, and elsewhere about the tense confrontations with Trump that Comey memorialized in memos afterward. A week after he took office in January, Trump allegedly demanded Comey's "loyalty" if he kept him on as FBI director, and he urged Comey to drop his ongoing investigation into Michael Flynn, Trump's fired national security adviser, in a separate, one-on-one meeting.

The source said that Comey is expected to stand by those accounts in his testimony.

"The bottom line is he's going to testify," the source close to the issue said. "He's happy to testify, and he's happy to cooperate."

Officials with the Justice Department and Mueller's office declined to comment.

http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/31/politics/fbi-comey-testimony/index.html
 
I've been waiting for this one...there are some people that don't take too kindly to being called a crazy nut job whacko by a crazy nut job whacko..should be interesting
 
I've been waiting for this one...there are some people that don't take too kindly to being called a crazy nut job whacko by a crazy nut job whacko..should be interesting

You really think he's going to be allowed to say anything? All of the questions will be about Hillary's emails. Maybe 2-3 mins at the end to ask if he knows anyone named Donald Trump.
 
You really think he's going to be allowed to say anything? All of the questions will be about Hillary's emails. Maybe 2-3 mins at the end to ask if he knows anyone named Donald Trump.

And the leaks. Don't forget about the leaks. It'll be another shit show from the GOP as far as questioning goes.
 
You really think he's going to be allowed to say anything? All of the questions will be about Hillary's emails. Maybe 2-3 mins at the end to ask if he knows anyone named Donald Trump.
I think he will speak about why he was fired, not about the investigation...I think he'll prove his point
 
FUUUUUUUUUUUCK THOSE LYING "SOURCES!!!!!"

Unless of course.....you're Trump and you RT this....then it's cool. Sources are reliable

 
FUUUUUUUUUUUCK THOSE LYING "SOURCES!!!!!"

Unless of course.....you're Trump and you RT this....then it's cool. Sources are reliable



sub-buzz-12411-1475240866-1.png


trump-tweet-sources-say.png
 
Trump and Denny say you can't believe anything from "sources" so this is obviously fake. I'm starting to doubt if there is anyone really named Comey.
Heard Comey had heart condition. Probably won't make it to testify. Saw it retweeted on twitter 5 million times, must be true.
 
I think he will speak about why he was fired, not about the investigation...I think he'll prove his point

I think he might just prove why he needed to be fired. Well he already has in my view.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aly
I think he might just prove why he needed to be fired. Well he already has in my view.
You'll see....your guy Trump will be found to have attempted to obstruct justice. ...for partisan purposes. It's only a matter of time until he insults the wrong guy...this may be the time
 
You'll see....your guy Trump will be found to have attempted to obstruct justice. ...for partisan purposes. It's only a matter of time until he insults the wrong guy...this may be the time

river, think about it. You will not find the FBI or anything close in the Constitution. Spend a little time looking into the formation and the authorization of the FBI. About as solid as quicksand.
Loosely based upon the old creeping authorization for the Railroad Police, which began from the sketchy authorization for the Pinkertons.
In short an agency accountable to no one.

How the hell can you have a body like the FBI that can without other authorization or any evidence begin an open ended investigation of a Presidential Candidate? Now to be fair he opened investigations into both candidates but he had evidence on one and he told us essentially what it was. On the other, he said he had no evidence. But then on the other hand the guy is supposes to be accountable to the President and the AG. If he can't articulate why he is investigating to the President, he must be fired.

The FBI has to be reviewed and a proper chain of command defined.
 
river, think about it. You will not find the FBI or anything close in the Constitution. Spend a little time looking into the formation and the authorization of the FBI. About as solid as quicksand.
Loosely based upon the old creeping authorization for the Railroad Police, which began from the sketchy authorization for the Pinkertons.
In short an agency accountable to no one.

How the hell can you have a body like the FBI that can with not other authorization or any evidence begin an open ended investigation of a Presidential Candidate? Now to be fair he opened investigations into both candidates but he had evidence on one and he told us essentially what it was. On the other, he said he had no evidence. But then on the other hand the guy is supposes to be accountable to the President and the AG. If he can't articulate why he is investigating to the President, he must be fired.

The FBI has to be reviewed and a proper chain of command defined.

If you get pulled over for speeding, do you tell the cop that the constitution doesn't mention speed limits?

barfo
 
If you get pulled over for speeding, do you tell the cop that the constitution doesn't mention speed limits?

barfo

That would be silly. The 10th amendment leaves such law enforcement to the States and local jurisdiction.
Read then post.
 
That would be silly. The 10th amendment leaves such law enforcement to the States and local jurisdiction.
Read then post.

But I thought the idea was to make silly arguments. That's what your post did, so I was just trying to join in.

barfo
 
@MarAzul cleaning barfo's clock.

Yellow journalism exposed, too.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/07/t...ny-that-trump-pressured-them-on-russia-probe/

Top Intel Community Officials Deny That Trump Pressured Them On Russia Probe

The directors of the Office of National Intelligence and the National Security Agency testified on Wednesday that they have not been pressured by President Trump on the ongoing Russia investigation, undercutting recent reports that they were.
 
@MarAzul cleaning barfo's clock.

Yellow journalism exposed, too.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/06/07/t...ny-that-trump-pressured-them-on-russia-probe/

Top Intel Community Officials Deny That Trump Pressured Them On Russia Probe

The directors of the Office of National Intelligence and the National Security Agency testified on Wednesday that they have not been pressured by President Trump on the ongoing Russia investigation, undercutting recent reports that they were.

Yes, I watched that hearing this morning. No, None to a man!

I also saw the Democrats go nuts over not getting what they want. Especially this one, from California;

Sen.-Kamala-Harris-MSNBC-1.png


https://www.rawstory.com/2017/06/go...y-after-she-grills-deputy-ag-on-russia-probe/
 
Last edited:
It was also interesting to listen to the questioning from Oregon Senator Weyden. He seem to be out of sync with the Dems, which is not really a surprise, he is often out of sync with the world.
But in this case he seems to shun anything to do with the Russian investigation unlike most of the Dems. He actually honed in on NSA questions in surveillance of Americans.
What the hell! Do you guy support this wild hair on this mission??
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top