Politics Source: Comey to testify publicly about Trump confrontations

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
UncleCliffy'sDaddy said:
So............supposedly there's no proof that Trump did anything illegal, so we should all back off, correct? Funny, Bill Clinton didn't do anything illegal by poking Lewinski with a cigar (stupid and immoral, yes, but NOT illegal) nor did Hillary break the law or do anything illegal with the email server bullshit OR the Benghazi clusterfuck (so we were told by too many investigative groups, including Comey) but the conservatards, after months (if not years) of tantrums and tears still have their panties in a bunch over it all. Talk about not letting something go.....And (from The Book Of Denny) the Clinton Foundation is a scam while the Trump Foundation is a bastion of the sainted. But then, I suppose my examples are "apples to oranges" with this crowd.......Keep on defending Trump despite the fact he is at least as sleazy as the Clintons. As long as his last name isn't Clinton he gets a free pass. Anyone who thinks Trump's situation is any different whatsoever is an uninformed numbskull. Bullshit is bullshit. And politics is hypocrisy by another name.......#Winning
Click to expand...

Go to town, but we don't have to take it seriously anymore.

There is no investigation of Trump. The people who are in trouble are the leakers and Flynn, and that's it.

So much heat, so little light.

:lol:
 
Oh oh oh! Law Newz is a lefty WWW site.

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/com...trump-instead-he-might-have-indicted-himself/

Comey was Before Congress to Indict Trump. Instead, He Might Have Indicted Himself.

The key interlude occurred with the ubiquitous Kamala Harris, the same Senator Harris who failed the bar the first time she took the bar exam. Only a Kamala-Comey marriage could birth this debacle:

Harris: “So was there any kind of memorandum issued from the attorney general or the Department of Justice to the FBI, outlining the parameters of his recusal”?

Comey: “Not that I’m aware of.”

Thursday night, Attorney General Sessions’ Justice Department released a statement about Comey’s testimony. The statement reads as follows:

“In his testimony, Mr. Comey states that he was not aware of any kind of memorandum issued from the Attorney General or the Department of Justice to the FBI outlining the parameters of the Attorney General’s recusal. However, on March 2, 2017, the Attorney General’s Chief of Staff sent the attached email specifically informing Mr. Comey and other relevant Department officials of the recusal and its parameters, and advising that each of them instruct their staff not to brief the Attorney General about or otherwise involve the Attorney General in any such matters described.” (internal ellipses omitted).

In fact, Comey always knew the “parameters of the Attorney General’s recusal.”

It gets worse for Comey. Right before and right after the answer that triggered the DOJ’s extraordinary written statement (name me the last time the DOJ publicly identified their recent ex-FBI Director as having just lied to Congress?), Comey denied knowledge about the “extent” of Sessions’ recusal and denied knowing Sessions’ scope of recusal as to “if he reviewed any FBI or DOJ documents.”

Congress criminalizes lying to Congress under oath. The relevant statutes are 18 USC 1621 and 18 USC 1001. Section 1621 requires a person first, be making a statement under a sworn oath; second, that statement be “material” to the proceeding; third, the statement be false; and fourth, the statement be knowingly and willfully false. Section 1001 mirrors those elements, without the same tribunal prerequisites: it also requires the government prove a person willfully made a materially false statements. In either case, the primary focus is: first, a false statement; second, a false statement as material to the matter; third, the false statement be made knowingly and willfully. A statement is not false if it can be interpreted in a completely innocent manner. A statement is not material if it is not particularly relevant or pertain to the subject of the matter. Willfully remains a very high standard of proof in the criminal law, though less in perjury cases than in tax cases: it requires the person know they are lying.

Sadly, for Comey, Sessions has the smoking gun: Sessions’ own email sent and read by Comey, according to the Department of Justice statement, showing Comey in fact did know “the parameters of the Attorney General’s recusal” despite his repeated comments to the contrary to Senator Kamala Harris’ questions.
 
upload_2017-6-9_7-23-40.png

LOL at NYTimes.

Stands by their lies.
 
barfo said:
Not sure you (or your source) could back that line up. What's the evidence of lack of character or integrity?

There basically were no scandals during those 8 years. At least compared to any other recent administration, D or R.

barfo
Click to expand...
I only need one example. When Obama indirectly told illegal aliens that they shouldn't be afraid to vote.

He did it, I saw the video. Used car salesman indeed.
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
I only need one example. When Obama indirectly told illegal aliens that they shouldn't be afraid to vote.

He did it, I saw the video. Used car salesman indeed.
Click to expand...

He didn't say that. He said (legit voters) family and friends of illegal aliens should vote.
 
18953306_438446053199806_9166825436199413835_o.jpg
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
Girl asked him directly and he didn't say no. That's what I'm talking about. Semantics.
Click to expand...

Listen to the whole thing in context. Just as I expose cherry picking and statements out of context regarding Trump, I do likewise with Obama and Clinton.

There were scandals in the Obama years.

Operation Fast and Furious.
Holder held in contempt of Congress.
The lie about you can keep your doctor.
Spying on journalists.
IRS scandal/selective targeting of conservative groups.
Benghazi.
Clinton's email server.
NSA spying/Snowden
Bergdahl
Iran nuclear deal
Solyndra
etc.
 
Sedatedfork said:
18953306_438446053199806_9166825436199413835_o.jpg
Click to expand...

Sad to see, no doubt.

https://news.grabien.com/story-moments-after-trumps-mental-health-pelosi-has-senior-moment

MOMENTS AFTER QUESTIONING TRUMP'S MENTAL HEALTH, PELOSI HAS SENIOR MOMENT(S)

Shortly after calling into question President Trump's mental health on MSNBC's 'Morning Joe,' House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi's own mental health came under scrutiny, as the 77-year-old California congresswoman referred to President Trump as "President Bush" and forgot what day of the week it is.

A reporter quickly helped her correct the gaffe, interjecting "Trump," but Pelosi appeared oblivious she slipped up.

An aide then emerged from the sidelines, passing Pelosi a note, notifying her she got the two presidents mixed up again.

Pelosi's confusion came just two hours after suggesting Trump was losing his mind. "I am concerned," she said on MSNBC, about Trump's "fitness for office."

"I think his family should be concerned about his health," Pelosi said. "The fact is that this is hopefully not reparable -- he’s the president of the United States."

"You mean you hope it is reparable?" Joe Scarborough asked, apparently confused.

"Yeah, yeah," she replied.

Asked if she had advise for Trump, she said, "go to sleep, get some sleep. Bring yourself to a place where your synapses are working."

During her weekly press conference, Pelosi not only became confused over who is president, but also what day of the week it is.

"I spoke with the speaker a week, a week and a couple days ago, about -- oh, no, just last Friday," she said. "What is today? Is it Friday again?"
 
Denny Crane said:
Listen to the whole thing in context. Just as I expose cherry picking and statements out of context regarding Trump, I do likewise with Obama and Clinton.

There were scandals in the Obama years.

Operation Fast and Furious.
Holder held in contempt of Congress.
The lie about you can keep your doctor.
Spying on journalists.
IRS scandal/selective targeting of conservative groups.
Benghazi.
Clinton's email server.
NSA spying/Snowden
Bergdahl
Iran nuclear deal
Solyndra
etc.
Click to expand...
Seen it a hundred times. The point is that he had the ability to say it without saying it. I watched his speech at the DNC before he ran for President and I thought DAMN! I'd vote for that guy.

What he said that night and how he actually governed were two entirely different things.
 
Denny Crane said:
Go to town, but we don't have to take it seriously anymore.

There is no investigation of Trump. The people who are in trouble are the leakers and Flynn, and that's it.

So much heat, so little light.

:lol:
Click to expand...

This misstates the facts. There was no investigation of Trump personally. I guess that's good for Trump himself, but doesn't clear his entire administration/campaign.

Flynn, Manafort, Page, Kushner, Sessions.... all 'in trouble'. And Trump may be 'in trouble' now.

barfo
 
Denny Crane said:
I see the latest DNC talking points have come out.
Click to expand...

Is bodyman5001 with the DNC? I'm surprised to hear that, but ok. He was the one who provided me that 'talking point'.

barfo
 
barfo said:
This misstates the facts. There was no investigation of Trump personally. I guess that's good for Trump himself, but doesn't clear his entire administration/campaign.

Flynn, Manafort, Page, Kushner, Sessions.... all 'in trouble'. And Trump may be 'in trouble' now.

barfo
Click to expand...

Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Only Flynn is in trouble, and Trump fired him after 3 weeks. He also fired Manafort. Page is nobody.

History is going to record who the buffoons really are/were.
 
barfo said:
Is bodyman5001 with the DNC? I'm surprised to hear that, but ok. He was the one who provided me that 'talking point'.

barfo
Click to expand...

I was referring to you.
 
Denny Crane said:
I was referring to you.
Click to expand...

I'm with the DNC? Maybe like all of Trump's associates and Russians, I met with them multiple times but just don't remember it.

barfo
 
Denny Crane said:
Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Only Flynn is in trouble, and Trump fired him after 3 weeks. He also fired Manafort. Page is nobody.

History is going to record who the buffoons really are/were.
Click to expand...
Didn't fire him fast enough.. duh.

I'm not with the DNC but I read what Barfo is going to write and Rasta is going to tweet on citydata's politics forum before they get the chance.
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
Didn't fire him fast enough.. duh.

I'm not with the DNC but I read what Barfo is going to write and Rasta is going to tweet on citydata's politics forum before they get the chance.
Click to expand...

citydata, huh? I will check that out.

barfo
 
Washington Examiner
CNSNews
Daily Caller
(Get off my) Lawnewz
Grabien

Got to say I never knew these things existed before Denny started quoting them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top