Politics SPECIAL COUNSEL APPOINTED!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Thank you ...but I reserve it for my art....now back to Trump...imagine Mexico paying for a wall! Now that's an imagination!

Didn't you read about Denny's avocado tax? $1 per avocado and 100 billion super bowl parties later the wall will be paid for.
 
Trumps main failing to date, is he has not selected a real hard nose as his Press Secretary. The kid he has is a likable fellow but hell, he needs one to demand order, and decorum in the briefings.
A man or woman that will let everyone know that each question will be ask in a curtous manner, showing due respect for the office, if they want an answer. Snark is out bound and penalties will be imposed.
 
Last edited:
most egregious, he wrote his own laws beyond any Constitutional authority. He rivals the worst Presidents in history for the honor to the title.

Yes, everyone agrees Trump's executive orders have been most egregious, including the unconstitutional Muslim ban. But let's give the man a chance!

barfo
 
Ha! Saved in favorites

"Politics barfo food futur date. SPECIAL COUNSEL APPOINTED! | Page 16 |"

What futur date are you thinking to come back to me on this?

barfo
 
MarAzul, by any chance were you in China yesterday?

barfo

Naw, I really dislike flying. The Airlines have managed to turned what was once a grand experience, into an ordeal more repugnant than a Trailways bus tour of Appalachia.
Ha! hard to believe your boy, he called a stewardess ‘sweetheart. Must have had diminished sense or something, I believe the sweethearts move on quite awhile back.
 
I know you and Marzy desperately want Trump to be your king but it's not gonna happen.

I don't want him to be king. I want him to serve out his term or terms as the constitution dictates.

We're not much of a country if the media gets to decide who's president and if they don't get their way we have a coup.
 
Last edited:
fake news brah

Not at all. It's as real as collusion between Trump campaign and Russia. I mean, we want to know how WikiLeaks got the stolen emails, right? Assange says it wasn't Russia (and there's zero evidence he's a liar), so it sure looks like someone's dropping the ball on what really happened.
 
your boyz owns this special counsel investigation. his intent over the fbi directors firing warrents it. his assistant attorney general says it has become a criminal investigation. no one would go there if it was at all possible without making the justice department look to be turning a blind eye. I hope the president is innocent, but I fear his ineptitude and that of his staff may bring down the presidency if not trump personally. no one wins in this investigation and in fact all will be losers. if it all proves to be so much smoke then why worry? if they can stand the scrutiny the administration comes out much stronger if all allegations are false.
 
Not at all. It's as real as collusion between Trump campaign and Russia. I mean, we want to know how WikiLeaks got the stolen emails, right? Assange says it wasn't Russia (and there's zero evidence he's a liar), so it sure looks like someone's dropping the ball on what really happened.
When did you start getting special intelligence briefings? Also there's zero evidence that Assange is telling the truth, so what about that?
 
According to our intelligence acencies the hacks were Russian. So, either our intelligence agencies are wrong or assange is lying. I personally have no evidence Assange is lying but sounds like our intelligence agencies do. Of course this doesn't mean there was collusion, but it does mean America should be investigating how, what and with whose knowledge/assistance the electoral process was influenced.

To say we should investigate Rich the same is silly. Investigate the hacks and information dissemination. If that leads us to Rich then unravel that thread. But so far as much as I can tell, that's not the case, but there have been many ties between people in trumps campaign/Whitehorse with Putins men, and some red flags attached to those connections.

But, nice try.
 
Denny knows it's not the Russians that hacked the DNC and helped Trump because he's the one who did the hacking!

Mags paid him in hot memes and cool twitter followers.
 
When did you start getting special intelligence briefings? Also there's zero evidence that Assange is telling the truth, so what about that?

There's millions of published pages on WikiLeaks and Assange's statements about them that suggest he's telling the truth. So there's that.
 
So Trump was right after all? It was a 400 lb guy on a bed?

barfo

Or someone with access to the NSA's tools, or the hackers who broke into Sony, or the hackers who broke into thousands or millions of machines this past week.
 
Yes, everyone agrees Trump's executive orders have been most egregious, including the unconstitutional Muslim ban. But let's give the man a chance!

barfo

Ha! Saved in favorites

"Politics barfo food futur date. SPECIAL COUNSEL APPOINTED! | Page 16 |"

What futur date are you thinking to come back to me on this?

barfo

 
Barfo!
Time to eat shit with a shovel!

You might want to temper your gloating, they only allowed part of it to be implemented prior to their consideration of the order.

They haven't actually ruled on the executive order yet.

barfo
 
Yeah, the major part

Unanimous. It looks as if this crew reads the Constitution and rules. Perhaps Trump will replace those on the left courts that pull feel good jingles out their arse.

So, he screwed up the first order completely and caused chaos at airports, stranded lots of people. Rewrote the ban, but still not well enough to be implemented. Finally after several months part of the order is allowed to go forward - but most people traveling from those 6 countries won't be kept out.

So much winning. You must be getting sick of winning.

barfo
 
I wrote before that Trump has the right/power to implement his ban. Obama did the same under the same right/power.

But I don't agree with the ban.

On the other hand, the talking heads on TV are claiming the ban isn't needed because nobody from those countries have effected an attack in the US (but they do overseas). Well, duh, the Obama bans did their job.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top