<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (AdropOFvenom @ Oct 22 2006, 09:00 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Brooksie5 @ Oct 22 2006, 04:16 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>But in the end it's about winning games, and he couldn't help you do that in the playoffs. So he's overpaid. I don't think they're saying that he's overpaid by $15 mil.. but he doesn't really deserve $17 mil, and not many (if any) players do.</div>.278 Batting Average.422 On Base Percentage.556 Slugging Percentage10 for 36, 10 R, 1 2B, 3 HR, 5 RBI, 9 BB, 5 K, 2 SBYeah, he didn't help us in the Playoffs. :whistling: <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>A-Rod has 2 MVP's. :whistling:</div>And you're going to tell me that he wasnt worth the 16 million or so that the Yankees had to pay him in 2005? Yes, A-Rod didn't earn his paycheck this past year, but in his MVP caliber seasons he earned his paycheck, right? :whistling:</div>All in all, A-Rod had just as good, if not better (It's too close to call IMO) year as Beltran did. Better Average, On Base %, and RBI; worse Slugging, Runs, Homeruns, and Stolen Bases.If A-Rod were on the Mets the conversation would have been "Who's the NL MVP, A-Rod or Beltran?" But he plays in the tougher (overall talent wise) AL. So his season (and Beltran's) are not MVP worthy in the AL.A-Rod was worth the money last year, as without him the Yankees would have missed the playoffs. This year we didn't need him to make the playoffs (and he sucked in them). So this year he wasn't worth the money.Are you saying the Mets miss the playoffs without Beltran?