dviss1
Emcee Referee
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2011
- Messages
- 29,715
- Likes
- 27,713
- Points
- 113
Stauskas? We talkin' bout' Stauskas?
Silly question:
When is A-1 (steak sauce) eligible to be traded?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stauskas? We talkin' bout' Stauskas?
Silly question:
When is A-1 (steak sauce) eligible to be traded?
Silly question:
When is A-1 (steak sauce) eligible to be traded?
Hah, like they'll be trading him.
Silly question:

Not Dame, not CJ, not Wade...we talkin' 'bout Stauskas! Not a player who's gonna play every game...we talkin' 'bout Stauskas! I mean, how silly is that? I mean, I know we're the Blazers forum, I know we're supposed to talk about Blazers. I know that. But we talkin' 'bout Stauskas! We talkin' 'bout Stauskas! Stauskas!!Stauskas? We talkin' bout' Stauskas?
Basketball reference says he’s 24 and 306 days, and all I want to know is if he’s over 24.Not Dame, not CJ, not Wade...we talkin' 'bout Stauskas! Not a player who's gonna play every game...we talkin' 'bout Stauskas! I mean, how silly is that? I mean, I know we're the Blazers forum, I know we're supposed to talk about Blazers. I know that. But we talkin' 'bout Stauskas! We talkin' 'bout Stauskas! Stauskas!!

Love it!Not Dame, not CJ, not Wade...we talkin' 'bout Stauskas! Not a player who's gonna play every game...we talkin' 'bout Stauskas! I mean, how silly is that? I mean, I know we're the Blazers forum, I know we're supposed to talk about Blazers. I know that. But we talkin' 'bout Stauskas! We talkin' 'bout Stauskas! Stauskas!!
HahahaStauskas? We talkin' bout' Stauskas?
For those that are "complaining" about this signing at the first moment......WHO ELSE would you have tried to get for $5.3M?
Olshey UPGRADED our 3PT % by replacing Napier and Pat with Stauskas and Curry. Major upgrade by % pts.
I believe that the "complainers" are just upset that we aren't in a position to improve the starting lineup significantly. We knew we wouldn't be able to do that with free agency. No surprise to me.

For those that are "complaining" about this signing at the first moment......WHO ELSE would you have tried to get for $5.3M?
Olshey UPGRADED our 3PT % by replacing Napier and Pat with Stauskas and Curry. Major upgrade by % pts.
I believe that the "complainers" are just upset that we aren't in a position to improve the starting lineup significantly. We knew we wouldn't be able to do that with free agency. No surprise to me.
For me it's not who we signed but the position they play. Between Simons, Trent, Stauskas, and Curry their best position all projects to be SG. I know they can all play some other positions at times but to me SF and a vet big were both bigger needs than adding two guards, let alone four.For those that are "complaining" about this signing at the first moment......WHO ELSE would you have tried to get for $5.3M?
Olshey UPGRADED our 3PT % by replacing Napier and Pat with Stauskas and Curry. Major upgrade by % pts.
I believe that the "complainers" are just upset that we aren't in a position to improve the starting lineup significantly. We knew we wouldn't be able to do that with free agency. No surprise to me.
For me it's not who we signed but the position they play. Between Simons, Trent, Stauskas, and Curry their best position all projects to be SG. I know they can all play some other positions at times but to me SF and a vet big were both bigger needs than adding two guards, let alone four.
I totally get not wanting to block Collins from getting major minutes but I feel like there is no net or backup plan if he struggles or there is an injury to him, Aminu, or Nurk. Plus I feel like we overcompensated a little bit for shooters at the expense of defensive improvement.
What I meant was that the new signings/draftees in particular weren't to help improve the defense, they were all for shooting help. Now the two rookies could be good defenders eventually (who knows) but that wasn't a huge factor in drafting them. Curry is an okay defender but not really considered a two way player. Stauskas is a bad defender. I know the defense can still be on par with last year, maybe even better depending on Collins having an expanded role and if we get the "engaged" Harkless.You had mine right up until "at the expense of defensive improvement."
Collins, Aminu and Harkless (and even Turner, ugh) are all good defenders. What we really need at the 3 and 4 spots are 2-way players who can both defender and score. We have the defense nailed at those two positions, but Harkless is the only one who has proven he can be a 2-way player. The problem is he tends to only prove it for about 20 games a year.
P.S. I "liked" your post anyway. You made some valid points.
BNM
I'd take that bet.Having experienced the ups and downs/mood swings (to put it nicely) in Blazerland since 1970, I’d almost be willing to put down some real cash that says that Sauce Castillo is a Blazer fan favorite by mid season. Or that’s the way it usually seems to work around here......
Having experienced the ups and downs/mood swings (to put it nicely) in Blazerland since 1970, I’d almost be willing to put down some real cash that says that Sauce Castillo is a Blazer fan favorite by mid season. Or that’s the way it usually seems to work around here......
Thats why I think Neil is postured for a trade to address the exact thing you address.For me it's not who we signed but the position they play. Between Simons, Trent, Stauskas, and Curry their best position all projects to be SG. I know they can all play some other positions at times but to me SF and a vet big were both bigger needs than adding two guards, let alone four.
I totally get not wanting to block Collins from getting major minutes but I feel like there is no net or backup plan if he struggles or there is an injury to him, Aminu, or Nurk. Plus I feel like we overcompensated a little bit for shooters at the expense of defensive improvement.
Wait till 2K19 comes out.Played 2k18 last night...Stauskas sucks on there
I am done with 2k until they take the focus off of virtual currency.Wait till 2K19 comes out.
WHO ELSE would you have tried to get for $5.3M?
Wait till 2K19 comes out.
Live 18 wasn’t too bad, not as good of a “simulation” as 2k, but much less focus on mictrotransactions. Live 19 looks like it’ll be pretty good so that’s what I’ll probably go with.That game is probably gonna suck. I might go with live.
Live 18 wasn’t too bad, not as good of a “simulation” as 2k, but much less focus on mictrotransactions. Live 19 looks like it’ll be pretty good so that’s what I’ll probably go with.
Ed fucking Davis.
Steak sauce will barely play.
I'm still waiting for Sega to come out with the Deamcast 2. Rumor has it that Sega is making a new system.Screw 2K.
I've owned nearly every 2K since Dreamcast.
Consensus is the 18 gameplay isn't nearly as good as 16 and I wholly agree. Shot meter on fucking layups now?? There are so many missed layups now it's fucking stupid. Thou can barely finish through contacts. The play assignment is STUPID...
I feel like I'm forced t play since I paid money for it...
Go YouTube "Agent 00" . He's the foremost knowledgeable on all things 2K.
I'm still waiting for Sega to come out with the Deamcast 2. Rumor has it that Sega is making a new system.
http://gaming.ebaumsworld.com/artic...console-and-it-might-be-dreamcast-2/85636676/

We didn't spend $5.3 million on Nik Stauskas. We signed him to a 1-year min contract of $1,512,601. He makes less than Layman, Baldwin, Swanigan and Simons. The only player on the rooster making less is Trent Jr. - a rookie 2nd round pick.
Regardless of what we paid Stauskas, we could have still kept Ed. We held his Bird rights. The decision to let Ed go happened before we signed Stauskas.
BNM

