Stotts and Mgmt: This is really starting to bug me

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Blazinaway

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2010
Messages
11,091
Likes
4,378
Points
113
Nice efort tonight and yet the almost inevitable loss to Miami. Yes Jeffries had a nice game but in reality what does that do for our Future? Meyers does not get a minute, nor does Claver, nor does Barton. But guys who will very likely not be here play a lot - Jeffries and Sasha. Just What the FUK is goin on? What does this do for us? This pisses me off, thx for lettin me vent.
 
The bench had an amazing stat line tonight.

Jeffries +24
Babbit +16
Pavlovic +11
Price +8

Yet, those 4 players combined for a whopping 10 points of offense total.
 
The bench had an amazing stat line tonight.

Jeffries +24
Babbit +16
Pavlovic +11
Price +8

Yet, those 4 players combined for a whopping 10 points of offense total.

and will ANY of those 4 be here next year?
 
Nice efort tonight and yet the almost inevitable loss to Miami. Yes Jeffries had a nice game but in reality what does that do for our Future? Meyers does not get a minute, nor does Claver, nor does Barton. But guys who will very likely not be here play a lot - Jeffries and Sasha. Just What the FUK is goin on? What does this do for us? This pisses me off, thx for lettin me vent.

I brought this up during the game thread and was going to start a similar thread. Well stated.

What is the objective here? I mean, if you're going to bench Hickson, at least put in Leonard or Freeland instead of giving Jeffries minutes.
 
I brought this up during the game thread and was going to start a similar thread. Well stated.

What is the objective here? I mean, if you're going to bench Hickson, at least put in Leonard or Freeland instead of giving Jeffries minutes.

yep, we ain't winnin nothing this year, we should be given guys who will likely be here some decent quality minutes to gain experience and see what they got
 
Last edited:
per Stotts: "we needed toughness and experience", so I played Jeffries-Sasha-Price, just fukkin A great, we lose anyway and other guys who WILL BE HERE get NO experience when they really need it
 
Coaches will NEVER develop young guys at the cost of possible wins. I don't blame Stotts, this is a management decision.
 
Coaches will NEVER develop young guys at the cost of possible wins. I don't blame Stotts, this is a management decision.

I figured that might be the case, that's why this thread was addresses to BOTH
 
It could be about matchups, and maybe Stotts is thinking it's a long year, and maybe saving those guys for tomorrow too, who knows.....
 
The coaches job is always to play to win especially when you are a team on the edge of the playoffs and not a total bottom feeder. If they played it any other way then as we all know, they lose their job. Stotts did pretty good tonight, sadly, Miami turned it up, the refs fail at their jobs again and Batum no showed again.
 
I care more about developing Lillard than any of the rest, and I think playing in tight ball games with experienced players is going to be better for his overall development than playing alongside young guys in a blowout. Rather him develop ala Rose than Wall, basically. Learn good habits over bad.
 
It could be about matchups, and maybe Stotts is thinking it's a long year, and maybe saving those guys for tomorrow too, who knows.....

LMA and Wes played 37 minutes tonight, Lillard and Batum 39, in perhaps the least winnable game of the year.

Have fun tomorrow night, Stotts. I'll also point out that this year's Asst/FG made stat is exactly the same as Nate's last full year as coach. So much for the
exciting brand of basketball' that we were all hoping to see.

11 assists on 39 FG made tonight.

Yes, I am pissed right now, but not at the players. Sometimes young players need to get blown out in order to learn as a group. Stotts seems very average to me at this point. How hard is it to ISO Lillard 39 mpg?
 
I care more about developing Lillard than any of the rest, and I think playing in tight ball games with experienced players is going to be better for his overall development than playing alongside young guys in a blowout. Rather him develop ala Rose than Wall, basically. Learn good habits over bad.

Lillard is developing just fine with real NBA players.

Jeffries, Price, and Pavovic are journeymen who are either past their prime, or aren't going to have an NBA prime.
 
least winnable game of the year? We beat them earlier and played them back and forth all night.
 
And Lillard has been in blowouts. Not sure how that generally helps players, would rather see them in crunch time situations than in garbage time.
 
I'm outraged. Jeffries was +24 but only played 20 minutes! What was Stotts thinking?
 
And Lillard has been in blowouts. Not sure how that generally helps players, would rather see them in crunch time situations than in garbage time.

The bench wasn't really in during crunch time, unless you count Pavlovic getting dunked on by James.
 
The bench wasn't really in during crunch time, unless you count Pavlovic getting dunked on by James.

great, they kept us close enough with help from the starters minus Hickson. I don't need the bench in at the end. I said I want Lillard in crunch time situations. PLaying better players earlier in the game helped that be a reality. We don't know if Claver or Leonard would have had a negative impact, but we do know our bench played decent tonight, and helped us stay close throughout. I want Lillard playing in those type of games, personally.
 
Has it ever occurred to any of you that Management TOLD Stotts to showcase Babbitt, Pavlovic, Jeffries, and Price? Notice the midseason trade deadline in a few days?

Obviously, Olshey wants to consolidate those 4 into a brand new spanking starting center, a present to the fans. This is great news.
 
Has it ever occurred to any of you that Management TOLD Stotts to showcase Babbitt, Pavlovic, Jeffries, and Price? Notice the midseason trade deadline in a few days?

Obviously, Olshey wants to consolidate those 4 into a brand new spanking starting center, a present to the fans. This is great news.

Wouldn't that be brand spanking new center? Cause that seems more appealing than a brand new spanking center.
 
In opinion, I avoid the center to practice ass-ymmetric warfare. I alternate cheeks.
 
How can anything bug you after watching the most exciting rookie since Lebron James put up 33 and then get props from said Le-bron after the game

Go Blazers
 
Coaches will NEVER develop young guys at the cost of possible wins. I don't blame Stotts, this is a management decision.

Exactly this. Now it's up to Olshey to to either force Stott's hand by trading away some of his "crutch" players, or they have to have a sit-down at some point when Olshey decides that the playoffs are out of reach and it's time to go into development mode. Frankly though, aside from Leonard, I don't think Olshey much cares how guys like Claver, Freeland, Smith and Babbitt contribute, the latter two guys are almost definitely gone this summer and the former two aren't his picks, so there's no reason to be invested in them.

If Hickson gets moved by the deadline (which seems remote) you'll definitely see more Leonard, taking some of the decision making out of Stotts' hands. If Hickson stays and Leonard can't get on the court and the losses continue to mount then who knows what the hell is going on.
 
I think Stotts has done a good job of getting the young guys playing time, while also trying to win for the sake of LaMarcus, Matthews and Batum. Leonard played a lot early in the season. He has to see what guys can do, as well as get guys minutes that could potentially be used in a trade at the deadline.

If I were a GM I would have seen that Babbitt might be able to help me a bit, Claver has a high bball IQ, Freeland has a nose for the ball and Nolan Smith could be a decent guy at the end of the bench. Pavlovic, Jeffries, Price all shown something to help boost their value in case.
 
I think Stotts has done a good job of getting the young guys playing time, while also trying to win for the sake of LaMarcus, Matthews and Batum. Leonard played a lot early in the season. He has to see what guys can do, as well as get guys minutes that could potentially be used in a trade at the deadline.

If I were a GM I would have seen that Babbitt might be able to help me a bit, Claver has a high bball IQ, Freeland has a nose for the ball and Nolan Smith could be a decent guy at the end of the bench. Pavlovic, Jeffries, Price all shown something to help boost their value in case.

only disagreement is that Pav-Jeffries-Price and even babbit IMO realistically cannot do anything at his point to change there trade value, that is a pipe dream IMO. I'd prefer to keep this year's pick and try to add value to guys who will be here next yr like Leonard-Claver-Freeland-Barton by playing them. I see both sides, this route is my preference.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top