Supreme Court: Cops can’t hold suspects to wait for drug-sniffing dog

[SlyPokerDog]

http://thehill.com/regulation/court...rules-cops-cant-hold-suspects-to-wait-for-dog

 

[MarAzul]

Weird! I have waited longer than that for a rookie cop to figure out how to use her computer to do a wants and warrents check. I got stopped for not wearing a seat belt? But I was, so after the the friggin 20 minutes fooling around she wanted to see my proof of insurance. My wife takes care of that stuff but I know it is in the glove compartment, I pull out three but I can't read them without my glasses which I don't have. She won't help and writes me up for no proof of insurance. Well I have insurance so I call the clerk and find out they can't fix it by State law now, have to go to court.

Man that young lady was a mess by the time I got done with her in court, stopping me for no seat belt but finding that was in error, fucking around for 20+ minutes on a computer then refusing to help and old vet out when he forgot his glasses. I asked her to speak up because I had difficulty hearing a couple time so she damn near had to shout. The cops waiting to work the next cases were all chortling in the court room so I continued until she was about to cry. Then I shut up. The judge apologized for the inconvenience.

 

[PDXFonz]

They will find something else to make people wait for. No you aren't waiting FOR the dogs, but they are on the way.