Politics Supreme Court will allow Sandy Hook families to move forward in suit against gunmaker Remington

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

So I'm curious. Do you think someone should be able to file a lawsuit against a motorcycle company or a car company for making a car that can go 160+ mph even though there isn't a road in America that you can legally go 160+ mph? And when someone crashes and dies, or kills someone else, is the car/motorcycle company liable?
Perhaps. That's why the Supreme Court Justices are paid the big bucks.
 
Do you see what's happening in Hong Kong? Chile? Venezuela? Do you know why those people are being brutally suppressed? Because they have no means to defend themselves.
Do you think some weirdo with a semiautomatic rifle or worse yet with a bolt action stands a chance of opposing trained and armed military with far superior weapons and numbers? That fits the very definition of insanity. Besides, that's not why our country's founders added the second amendment. They added it because back in the day White men were required by local ordinances to own and train in a well regulated militia in case of a revolt by slaves. There were more slaves than White men in a lot of our country and they feared Blacks would rise up and kill all the White men and rape all the White women. I had an uncle in Alabama who slept with a pistol under his pillow who had the same ignorant, stupid belief.
 
I think the first step towards an oppressive regime is disarming the public.

So, the Netherlands, where they have 2.6 guns per 100 people is under a more oppressive regime than Sudan (dictatorship) with 9.6 guns per 100 people? Or China (3.6) or Russia (12.3)?

The people of Taiwan (0.0) must be suffering the most oppressive regime known to man by this metric.

Yeah, not buying this argument.
 
According to my calendar I've cheated death 11, 126 times so I'm in the clear
 
Good afternoon S2!

Man you guys are getting good! Send a virtue signal and shazam! Responses right on queue, and the correct response too. Only a couple nonconformists.
Ah! Soon fixed.
 
There were more slaves than White men in a lot of our country and they feared Blacks would rise up and kill all the White men and rape all the White women.

Lord!

At the time of the civil war, there were less than four million slave in the US. They were owned by and extremely small minority of citizens, less than 400,000 slave holders out a population of 31 million people.
That is about 1.4% of the population were slave holders. Hell there were far more immigrants in the country by that time than there were slaves and slave holders.

History is a wonderful subject, enthralling to read. I highly recommend it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't realize the odds were that high. Now I'm more anti-gun than I was before reading your post.

barfo

Exactly what I was thinking. Those odds seem worse than I thought. I have three kids in public schools from 3rd to 8th grade. When you get the message below THREE TIMES between Sept and Nov, you get to the point, like me, where you make statements such as "anyone/anything to do with guns can fuck off".

upload_2019-11-12_16-22-29.png
 
Exactly what I was thinking. Those odds seem worse than I thought. I have three kids in public schools from 3rd to 8th grade. When you get the message below THREE TIMES between Sept and Nov, you get to the point, like me, where you make statements such as "anyone/anything to do with guns can fuck off".

View attachment 28446
I agree with you except that I see no problem with hunting rifles that are bolt action with a clip of six rounds such as mine. Hunters do not need semiautomatics with clips of more than 10 rounds nor do they need handguns. Slave owners, now they need guns to control their slaves because you see, slaves are not particularly fond of being slaves.
 
In order to prove liability, however absurd and pathetically greedy the attempt may be, it will be necessary for the plaintiffs to provide proof of loss through the commission of a crime brought about by or in part by Remington Arms. More likely liability claims would be against the murderer's estate, the murderer's parents who armed and enabled him, the psychologist of the murderer, local officials, federal officials...

The lawsuit against Remington Arms solidifies the logic of a false flag operation performed to deceive the public into irrational rage against firearm manufacturers.

Since nearly all physical evidence of the alleged crime including the entire school building it allegedly occurred in were immediately destroyed or hidden by the Deep State, this could get the case tossed/settled without much more public discussion.

Whatever did or didn't happen in Sandy Hook, nobody in the Federal government wants to see a court subpoena with their name on it.
 
Like I said FUCK guns and anything and anyone that loves them. I'm so sick of kids getting shot, sick to my stomach. The infatuation this country has with weapons is a disgrace. Whoever owned this gun that this piece of shit used today needs to be held accountable. Goddamn joke. Imagine sending your 16 year old daughter to school this morning and three hours later looking at her dead body in a hospital because some kid got his hands on a gun and shot her. Pathetic.
 
Back
Top