<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Claud @ Jul 26 2008, 11:16 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Belarus @ Jul 26 2008, 11:06 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (nets1 @ Jul 26 2008, 10:44 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>neither, lets get rid of kvh, swift the stiff, and haskell first</div>
wise comment
</div>
You need to have a package done to get rid of them. And Boone and/or Swat may be in it.
</div>
not really. Lets say you have a team that needs to get rid of salary fast. You package KVH, swift the stiff and maybe even Haskell and say a half million in cash for Kvh's buyout, for a high paid player who has like 3 years left on his deal. The player is a decent player and the team we trade with gets to immediately cut 4.4 million off of this years cap, and anohter 8 or 10 million off of next years cap. The nets gain cause they dump 3 worthless players for one decent player and neither boone or swat got to go anywhere. The bulls and nuggets come to mind. In fact i wouldnt' mind if the nets did that deal for Kmart, and that would be the other shoe that drops...
Plus you could add the number one draft pick we got for Marcus if it were for the Kenyon deal.