Politics TAKING DOWN THE DEEP STATE

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

Looks like Hillary Clinton betrayed America to China for her entire term as Secretary of State.

SOURCES: China Hacked Hillary Clinton’s Private Email Server

9:22 PM 08/27/2018
Richard Pollock | Reporter

  • A Chinese-owned company penetrated former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private server, according to sources briefed on the matter.
  • The company inserted code that forwarded copies of Clinton’s emails to the Chinese company in real time.
  • The Intelligence Community Inspector General warned of the problem, but the FBI subsequently failed to act, Texas Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert said during a July hearing.

A Chinese-owned company operating in the Washington, D.C., area hacked Hillary Clinton’s private server throughout her term as secretary of state and obtained nearly all her emails, two sources briefed on the matter told The Daily Caller News Foundation.


The Chinese firm obtained Clinton’s emails in real time as she sent and received communications and documents through her personal server, according to the sources, who said the hacking was conducted as part of an intelligence operation.


The Chinese wrote code that was embedded in the server, which was kept in Clinton’s residence in upstate New York. The code generated an instant “courtesy copy” for nearly all of her emails and forwarded them to the Chinese company, according to the sources.


The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found that virtually all of Clinton’s emails were sent to a “foreign entity,” Rep. Louie Gohmert, a Texas Republican, said at a July 12 House Committee on the Judiciary hearing. He did not reveal the entity’s identity, but said it was unrelated to Russia. (RELATED: Gohmert: Watchdog Found Clinton Emails Were Sent To ‘Foreign Entity’)


Two officials with the ICIG, investigator Frank Rucker and attorney Janette McMillan, met repeatedly with FBI officials to warn them of the Chinese intrusion, according to a former intelligence officer with expertise in cybersecurity issues, who was briefed on the matter. He spoke anonymously, as he was not authorized to publicly address the Chinese’s role with Clinton’s server.


Among those FBI officials was Peter Strzok, who was then the bureau’s top counterintelligence official. Strzok was fired this month following the discovery he sent anti-Trump texts to his mistress and co-worker, Lisa Page. Strzok didn’t act on the information the ICIG provided him, according to Gohmert.


Gohmert mentioned in the Judiciary Committee hearing that ICIG officials told Strzok and three other top FBI officials that they found an “anomaly” on Clinton’s server.


The former intelligence officer TheDCNF spoke with said the ICIG “discovered the anomaly pretty early in 2015.”


“When [the ICIG] did a very deep dive, they found in the actual metadata — the data which is at the header and footer of all the emails — that a copy, a ‘courtesy copy,’ was being sent to a third party and that third party was a known Chinese public company that was involved in collecting intelligence for China,” the former intelligence officer told TheDCNF.


“The [the ICIG] believe that there was some level of phishing.But once they got into the server something was embedded,” he said. “The Chinese are notorious for embedding little surprises like this.”


The intelligence officer declined to name the Chinese company.


“We do know the name of the company.There are indications there are other ‘cutouts’ that were involved.I would be in a lot of trouble if I gave you the name,” he told TheDCNF.


A government staff official who’s been briefed on the ICIG’s findings told TheDCNF that the Chinese state-owned firm linked to the hacking operates in Washington’s northern Virginia suburbs. The source was not authorized to publicly discuss the matter.


The company that penetrated Clinton’s server was not a technology firm and it served as a “front group” for the Chinese government, the source told TheDCNF.


The Fairfax and Loudoun county governments told TheDCNF that 13 state-owned Chinese companies operate in the area. Of those, three were not technologically oriented.


Fairfax County Economic Development Authority communications manager Seth Livingston told TheDCNF that all of the nine firms operating in his county were there in 2009 when Clinton began as secretary of state.


“Our Asian folks believe that all of the companies have been around and known to us since that time period,” he said in an email.


“This is the most combed over subject in modern American political history,” Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill told TheDCNF. “The FBI spent thousands of hours investigating, and found no evidence of intrusion. That’s a fact.”


“But in an age where facts are alternative and truth isn’t truth, it’s no surprise that an outlet like the Daily Caller would try to distract us from very real and very immediate threats to our democracy brought by the man occupying the White House,” he continued.


Department of State Inspector General Steven A. Linick and then-ICIG I. Charles McCullough III scrutinized Clinton’s server in 2015. McCullough told Congress in July 2015 that her emails contained classified material.


“IC IG was involved in the classification review of certain information drawn from the private email server,” an agency spokeswoman told TheDCNF. She declined to comment further.


The two IGs asked the Department of Justice to investigate whether the classified information was compromised, according to a July 23, 2015, New York Times report based on unnamed senior government officials.


The FBI issued a referral to the Justice Department in July 2015. The bureau warned that classified information may have been disclosed to a foreign power or to one of its agents.


“FBIHQ, Counterespionage Section, is opening a full investigation based on specific articulated facts provided by an 811 referral from the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community, dated July 6, 2015 regarding the potential compromise of classified information,” a July 10, 2015, FBI memo stated.


An 811 referral informs the FBI of classified information that was potentially released to a foreign power or agent of a foreign power.


“This investigation is also designated a Sensitive Investigative Matter (SIM) due to a connection to a current public official, political appointee or candidate,” the memo stated.


Then-FBI Deputy Director Mark F. Giuliano sent a follow-up memo on July 21, 2015, to President Barack Obama’s deputy attorney general, Sally Yates, about two conversations he had with her about the criminal referral.


“On 13 July 2015 and 20 July 2015, I verbally advised you of a Section 811(c) referral from the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community received by the FBI on 06 July 2015. The referral addressed the mishandling of classified information on the personal e-mail account and electronic media of a former high-level us Government official,” according to the FBI memo, which was hand delivered to Yates.


Justice Department spokesman Devin M. O’Malley declined to comment on this story.


Former FBI Director James Comey acknowledged in his recent book, “A Higher Loyalty: Truth, Lies, and Leadership,” that the FBI was conducting a criminal investigation into Clinton’s conduct.


London Center for Policy Research’s vice president of operations, retired Col. Anthony Shaffer, told TheDCNF that Clinton’s server was vulnerable to hacking.


“Look, there’s evidence based on the complete lack of security hygiene on the server.Fourteen-year-old hackers from Canada could have probably hacked into her server and left very little trace,” Shaffer said. “Any sophisticated organization is going to be able to essentially get in and then clean up their presence.”


And a former consultant to the U.S. trade representative, Claude Barfield, told TheDCNF: “The Chinese were in the process of really gaining technological competence in 2009 to 2010. This begins to really take off in the early years of the Obama administration. The Obama administration was kind of late and there was this slow reaction about how sophisticated the Chinese were.”


https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/27/china-hacked-clinton-server/
Oh that darn Hillary. She must have a shit pile of indictments in the work. Don't tell me, let me guess. Any day now?
 
Its funny to me that most extreme leftist are very critical of police and they are crooks and on the take, but they would never think in a million years that the FBI or DOJ could be corrupt?
No one is infallible, not Presidents, FBI, DOJ, Congress.
We must have a system that will keep people in power in check. Term Limits would help.
 
Its funny to me that most extreme leftist are very critical of police and they are crooks and on the take, but they would never think in a million years that the FBI or DOJ could be corrupt?
No one is infallible, not Presidents, FBI, DOJ, Congress.
We must have a system that will keep people in power in check. Term Limits would help.
I've been a big believer in the FBI and the Justice Department since I was a wee sprout. Still am. To me, the only blemish was J. Edgar Hoover's treatment of The Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. However, I loved how they took down organized crime and especially the KKK. The took guts and meticulous planning.
 
I've been a big believer in the FBI and the Justice Department since I was a wee sprout. Still am. To me, the only blemish was J. Edgar Hoover's treatment of The Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. However, I loved how they took down organized crime and especially the KKK. The took guts and meticulous planning.
Im a believer in them as well, same with ICE. Just need to keep bad apples out!
 
Im a believer in them as well, same with ICE. Just need to keep bad apples out!
There's bad apples everywhere. I'm all for finding them out and culling them out.
 
Term Limits would help

I do also. We have it for the President, need it for Congress now. However, there is no way in hell that we get Congress to vote to curb their power by imposing term limits upon themselves. A big reason I support a Convention of the States to begin some of these needed Constitutional amendments. Term limits would improve the hell out of our Government.
 
On the contrary, the country would be much better off if we'd repealed the 22nd amendment a couple years ago.

barfo
 
I do also. We have it for the President, need it for Congress now. However, there is no way in hell that we get Congress to vote to curb their power by imposing term limits upon themselves. A big reason I support a Convention of the States to begin some of these needed Constitutional amendments. Term limits would improve the hell out of our Government.
The way to clean up Congress would be pay them like school teachers ...watch how fast they scramble back to the private sector.
 
Its funny to me that most extreme leftist are very critical of police and they are crooks and on the take, but they would never think in a million years that the FBI or DOJ could be corrupt?
No one is infallible, not Presidents, FBI, DOJ, Congress.
We must have a system that will keep people in power in check. Term Limits would help.


Yeah, we think the President has all the power, but realistically what ever he does for four or eight years, for the most part , can be undone. The real power are the career politicians with their pockets being lined by lobbyists. Guys that spend decades using the system.
 
Looks like Hillary Clinton betrayed America to China for her entire term as Secretary of State.

SOURCES: China Hacked Hillary Clinton’s Private Email Server

The FBI says this is complete bullshit. But who you going to believe, the FBI, or half-wit Louie Gohmert?

20qk3d.jpg


barfo
 
Yeah, we think the President has all the power, but realistically what ever he does for four or eight years, for the most part , can be undone. The real power are the career politicians with their pockets being lined by lobbyists. Guys that spend decades using the system.
bingo....term limits in congress would hurt the power of lobbyist in a big way.
 
bingo....term limits in congress would hurt the power of lobbyist in a big way.

It would actually enhance the power of lobbyists, because the lobbyists, who would not be term limited, would know the system much better than the congresspeople.

barfo
 
The concept of the FBI is flawed in several ways. The idea that the FBI Director in not directly accountable to the only elected
executive in our government is flawed. The idea that he can not be fired without accusing the President of Obstruction of Justice is very flawed.

The idea that Lying to the FBI is a crime no matter how convoluted is not in step with the 5th amendment where a person can not be compelled to incriminate themselves.

The idea that they can investigate citizens including government officials with or worse yet, without evidence is flawed. This process is totally lacking in a due process procedure that protects the citizen from harassment by a powerful government agency. They really are not required to show results for their actions. Not discussing ongoing investigations or justifying them to any level of over site accountable to the people is illogical and inconsistent with the concept of Due Process.

They can indeed harm a citizen that has committed no crime, with impunity. We have given similar power out before, to the Railroad Police. The FBI was created in part from this pattern. The Railway Police can harm a citizen following no due process, and the Citizen will find no recourse available. Same with the FBI.
 
It would actually enhance the power of lobbyists, because the lobbyists, who would not be term limited, would know the system much better than the congresspeople.

barfo
Not sure I agree but do understand what you are saying. I would hope that constant turnover in congress would lead to less long term obligations to lobbyist.
The new rule that an exiting elected Congress person would have to wait 5 years to become a lobbyist hopefully help?
An elective official should be the servant of the people not where the money is..just my opinion.
 
The way to clean up Congress would be pay them like school teachers ...watch how fast they scramble back to the private sector.

Sound good, but I rather doubt many go for the salary now. See Duncan Hunter. I fear the lobbyist can find a way to sweeten the pot. I think we need citizen going to Congress from a sense of duty, not for a lucrative career.

Perhaps we pay them like teachers and limit their term of duty.
 
Not sure I agree but do understand what you are saying. I would hope that constant turnover in congress would lead to less long term obligations to lobbyist.
The new rule that an exiting elected Congress person would have to wait 5 years to become a lobbyist hopefully help?
An elective official should be the servant of the people not where the money is..just my opinion.
The only way to get lobbyists out of virtual control of Congress is to limit campaign expenditure. This is best exemplified by the corrupt lobbying by Jack Abramoff and his hangers-on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Abramoff
 
The concept of the FBI is flawed in several ways. The idea that the FBI Director in not directly accountable to the only elected
executive in our government is flawed. The idea that he can not be fired without accusing the President of Obstruction of Justice is very flawed.

The idea that Lying to the FBI is a crime no matter how convoluted is not in step with the 5th amendment where a person can not be compelled to incriminate themselves.

The idea that they can investigate citizens including government officials with or worse yet, without evidence is flawed. This process is totally lacking in a due process procedure that protects the citizen from harassment by a powerful government agency. They really are not required to show results for their actions. Not discussing ongoing investigations or justifying them to any level of over site accountable to the people is illogical and inconsistent with the concept of Due Process.

They can indeed harm a citizen that has committed no crime, with impunity. We have given similar power out before, to the Railroad Police. The FBI was created in part from this pattern. The Railway Police can harm a citizen following no due process, and the Citizen will find no recourse available. Same with the FBI.

How do you get evidence without investigating?
 
The concept of the FBI is flawed in several ways. The idea that the FBI Director in not directly accountable to the only elected
executive in our government is flawed.

Why? Do you want everyone in government to report directly to the President?

The idea that he can not be fired without accusing the President of Obstruction of Justice is very flawed.

I think you are letting your feelings get in the way of rationality here. FBI directors have been fired w/o an accusation of obstruction.

The idea that Lying to the FBI is a crime no matter how convoluted is not in step with the 5th amendment where a person can not be compelled to incriminate themselves.

So are you against having perjury as a crime generally? This is a hilariously Trumpian position, that lying is fine and to be expected, and hell, really what any honorable man would do.

Nobody lost their 5th amendment rights. They just didn't exercise them.

The idea that they can investigate citizens including government officials with or worse yet, without evidence is flawed. This process is totally lacking in a due process procedure that protects the citizen from harassment by a powerful government agency. They really are not required to show results for their actions. Not discussing ongoing investigations or justifying them to any level of over site accountable to the people is illogical and inconsistent with the concept of Due Process.

No, sorry but due process does not require discussing the investigation with the target prior to charges being brought. That's not the way any of this works. When and if he's charged with a crime, he gets to defend himself in a court of law. Not before.

They can indeed harm a citizen that has committed no crime, with impunity. We have given similar power out before, to the Railroad Police. The FBI was created in part from this pattern. The Railway Police can harm a citizen following no due process, and the Citizen will find no recourse available. Same with the FBI.

Yes, let's just get rid of law enforcement to protect Trump from any possible charges, because that's the most important thing.

barfo
 
Not sure I agree but do understand what you are saying. I would hope that constant turnover in congress would lead to less long term obligations to lobbyist.
The new rule that an exiting elected Congress person would have to wait 5 years to become a lobbyist hopefully help?
An elective official should be the servant of the people not where the money is..just my opinion.

Let's put it this way, if you owned a business, would your business run better if you fired all employees when they'd been employed for X number of years, and replaced them with someone with no experience?

As for the 5 year ban on congresspeople becoming lobbyists, I don't believe there is any such rule. Maybe you are thinking of the 5 year "ban" Trump signed regarding executive branch people from becoming lobbyists, but note that that actually weakened the rules in several respects.

barfo
 
FBI directors have been fired w/o an accusation of obstruction.

Yes, one was.
Clinton was perceived as firing Sessions in part because he was a Republican holdover from the Reagan administration.

I have no problem with either firing.
It is the response of the Democrats and RINO(s) to one that is disgusting and disruptive.
 
Last edited:
Yes, one was.
Clinton was perceived as firing Sessions in part because he was a Republican holdover from the Reagan administration.

I have no problem with either firing.
It is the response of the Democrats to one that is disgusting and disruptive.

I don't see how people having opinions is disruptive. If it is, then you should reconsider your opinions.

If Trump is charged with obstructing justice, it will be Republicans that charge him.

barfo
 
Let's put it this way, if you owned a business, would your business run better if you fired all employees when they'd been employed for X number of years, and replaced them with someone with no experience?

As for the 5 year ban on congresspeople becoming lobbyists, I don't believe there is any such rule. Maybe you are thinking of the 5 year "ban" Trump signed regarding executive branch people from becoming lobbyists, but note that that actually weakened the rules in several respects.

barfo
I understand you take with re: to a business. Usually a business model would be different than a government as it's depended on elected officials to serve, not to be employed as such.
Im sure Trump would love to totally run the Gov as a business but he cannot, totally. Thats why he thinks he's a one termer.
I stand corrected about the 5 year rule. Sometimes things get foggy!
 
I understand you take with re: to a business. Usually a business model would be different than a government as it's depended on elected officials to serve, not to be employed as such.
Im sure Trump would love to totally run the Gov as a business but he cannot, totally. Thats why he thinks he's a one termer.
I stand corrected about the 5 year rule. Sometimes things get foggy!

I completely agree with you that government is not business. I only made that comparison because some in this forum feel it should be.

I wish that we could have a true 'citizen legislature', but it isn't realistic as a part-time profession anymore. So they have to be our employees. We should treat them as such, give them promotions and pay raises when they do good, fire them when they do bad.

Voters actually have the tools to resolve problems with congress already - they just refuse to use them consistently.

barfo
 
I would never try to tell my Bride she is "marginalized" , hahaha but yeah, you splained it better than I

Hah, I hear you... I don't feel marginalized as a woman most of the time either but I was looking for a generic word that was inclusive but not offensive... you gotta be careful what you say round here, people get offended easily! :smiley-beerchug:
 
Back
Top