Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You never read "Old Man in the Sea"?Well what has Hemingway to do with it?
You never read "Old Man in the Sea"?
His short stories were great...much better than the novels but for the sea and fishing...he was a landscape painter with words.Oh! That was the only Hemingway I could make it through.
If I even bother to vote I'm probably voting for him, I'm not going to be party to either of the other two numb skulls.
Well essentially voting for a third party candidate in the current political system is a defacto vote for one of the main party's candidates because Gary Johnson won't get enough votes to win, just enough to screw over one of the other candidates, and in fact possibly electing the candidate you like the least.
It sucks that it works that way. I welcome a political system that has more the two parties. It's like Hatfield vs McCoy every four years. A third party should be allowed into the main stream, I.e. the primaries, debates, etc. Our political system is very skewed, and goes against the democratic nature of our country. Though our country isn't really a Democracy is it, but rather a Republic.
I actually agree even though I will likely vote for Hillary. I don't like how many in both mainstream parties say it's a throwaway vote if you don't vote D or R. If you think of it that way, then really it's a throwaway vote if you vote for anyone other than the winner. So, if Hillary continues to look like she will win, then voting for Trump would be just as much a "throw-away" vote as voting for Stein, Johnson or writing in Bernie or Big bird. I just think it's a grey area, voting for an eventual loser can be a protest vote, but it can also be a needed building block if your ideals are ever to take hold.If people take a defeatist attitude, then of course no 3rd party candidate will get elected ever.
I'm not as much of a bleeding heart liberal as you.
Maybe, maybe not. Potheads are waaaaaaaaaaay worse to be around and it isn't even a debate.LMAO some of you are clueless. Marijuana is more dangerous/harmful than alcohol? Laughable.
I've never had a pothead pick a fistfight with me. How many people get high and kick the shit out of their spouse or kids? My nephew's mom just showed up to his swimming meet fall-down drunk on Saturday afternoon and had to be carted off.Maybe, maybe not. Potheads are waaaaaaaaaaay worse to be around and it isn't even a debate.
Oh and comparing the dangers of alcohol and pot isn't a fair comparison. .
It's not like it has to be one or the other, how bout people just use a little moderation. When I worked at OHSU, I knew so many Doctors and scientists, administrators, lawyers, electricians and techs like myself who would smoke pot occasionally or have a couple drinks at a party. All seemed to have fun during those evenings but the next day, they did their work well. That's most people. If you smoke pot 4 times a day, or drink a fifth of bourbon at a time, you are going to likely have that negatively impact your life. Most people know better.
I've never had a pothead pick a fistfight with me. How many people get high and kick the shit out of their spouse or kids? My nephew's mom just showed up to his swimming meet fall-down drunk on Saturday afternoon and had to be carted off.
So "not debatable?" OK, if you insist.
People who drink water commit crimes, people who smoke tobacco...people who eat sugar and ride bicycles....there's no upward trend in violent pot heads...there's an upward trend in violent people...people either control their behavior or not...a lot of alcoholics are also potheads...lot of tweakers are pot heads..lot of idiots are users of everything from toilet paper to gasolineStats from the US Dept of Justice indicate an upward trend of violent crime while under the influence of marijuana. .
For adults convicted of a violent crime while under the influence of drugs, over 70% of them are under the influence of marijuana.
The % of violent crimes committed while under the influence of marijuana as increase significantly over the last 20 years.
I meant in public places. Anything is debatable I suppose, some people think Hillary is a great choice for President.I've never had a pothead pick a fistfight with me. How many people get high and kick the shit out of their spouse or kids? My nephew's mom just showed up to his swimming meet fall-down drunk on Saturday afternoon and had to be carted off.
So "not debatable?" OK, if you insist.
You've never been a bartender I take itMaybe, maybe not. Potheads are waaaaaaaaaaay worse to be around and it isn't even a debate.
how bout people just use a little moderation.
You've never been a bartender I take it
I didn't know they smoked pot until it was legalized. I'm sure you'd be shocked how many people actually use.
Hey my drug of choice is Glenfiddich neat or a Bulleit and soda, so it's not like I have some dog in the fight with marijuana -- it puts me up in my own head (so to speak), and I already spend way too much time there already.Stats from the US Dept of Justice indicate an upward trend of violent crime while under the influence of marijuana. .
For adults convicted of a violent crime while under the influence of drugs, over 70% of them are under the influence of marijuana.
The % of violent crimes committed while under the influence of marijuana as increase significantly over the last 20 years.
Glenfiddich .
Nope, jealous of those in Vegas making 6 figures though.You've never been a bartender I take it
I don't agree with you at all. I also don't really understand how anyone could ever come to that conclusion.. but to each their own.Maybe, maybe not. Potheads are waaaaaaaaaaay worse to be around and it isn't even a debate.
