- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 73,114
- Likes
- 10,945
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Looks like Ohio still refuses to recognize the Libertarian Party and will not allow Johnson on their ballots...sheesh..he's only 4% from getting into the debates as of yesterday but Ohio is cock blocking him
Yep.
What a contrast between him and the awful other two.
Actually - no. It was a perfectly nice ad, but not exactly convincing. Sort of 'Gary Johnson - he likes apple pie and puppies'
barfo
Like that's not an improvement over the Evil Witch of the East and Hitler Light?
Hell, I like apple pie and puppies. I shouldn't be president, and neither should Gary Johnson.
Ok, just kidding. I hate apple pie and puppies. The flavor of the puppies overwhelms the pie.
barfo
If you would remove your blue glasses for a minute, you'd see that there's nobody left in the race who should be president. It's a matter of avoiding the most toxic of the dreck that remains. That leaves me with Johnson as the only ethical choice.
you need to feed apples to the puppies for many weeks before baking the pies..Hell, I like apple pie and puppies. I shouldn't be president, and neither should Gary Johnson.
Ok, just kidding. I hate apple pie and puppies. The flavor of the puppies overwhelms the pie.
barfo
Policy, which for some strange reason named Trump has not been discussed at all in this campaign, matters. It matters way more than the personal quirks of the president, in the long run.
Johnson might (or might not) be more ethical than the other two, but he's disqualified (in my opinion) because of his policy ideas.
barfo
At least he tells you what his policy ideas are.
Hillary's are malleable depending upon the views of the highest bidder.
you need to feed apples to the puppies for many weeks before baking the pies..
I prefer to go with the Iberico route, finishing them with acorns for about 2 months..
That is a misleading statement - in fact Hillary's policies ideas are fleshed out in much greater detail than Johnson's. compare https://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/ to, well, it seems that Johnson's site is broken and redirects to http://oops.johnsonweld.com/
In the words of Rick Perry: "Oops"
I don't think that is a fair statement either - what evidence is there that she is any more 'buyable' than Johnson is?
barfo
What planet do you reside on, (I would ask if I didn't know you were just deliberately playing dumb)?
Let me provide a few thousand credible links to vetted facts proving her crimes of graft and treason.
https://www.google.com/search?q=hillary bought and paid for&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/292543-johnson-to-appear-on-ohio-ballot
Delusional Gary Johnson to help Hillary win Ohio ballot
http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2016/08/gary_johnson_qualifies_for_ohi.html
Do-Nothing-for-Americans Gary Johnson stumps for DNC on Ohio ballot
Uhm, yes, I understand it is a right-wing talking point that she's corrupt.
But what actual evidence is there that she changes her policy views based on who gives her money?
barfo
Again, you know how to google and even though google is ultra-blue and drastically skews and controls what news you see, you'll find proof even by sources you have to accept, assuming you aren't just jacking off in a pool of self-loathing lust for Hillary.
https://www.google.com/search?q=hillary emails prove pay for play&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8
Sorry, meeting people is not the same thing as changing one's policy positions. Try again, but be careful. Google can and will use whatever you search for against you when they start rounding people up in their 'driverless cars' which are actually mobile gas chambers/incineration machines.
barfo
Well, I guess you can switch hands if you get bored.
https://www.facebook.com/HillaryForPrison16/?hc_ref=PAGES_TIMELINE
Shooting fish in a barrel, as usual.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ry-clinton-change-position-same-sex-marriage/
In 2011, Johnson tweeted “No to mandatory vaccines,” but asked in an interview with VPR Wednesday about his position, Johnson said he now believes that vaccinations should be mandatory.
Not clear what you think that shows. Yes, she changed her position on gay marriage. As did most Americans.
There's not even a suggestion there that she changed her position as a result of some sort of corruption.
barfo
