The known facts of Hillary Clinton's server is worthy of an indictment. Here is a timeline.

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!


No stories about Diaper Man David Vitter?

Vitter.jpg
 
So these bribes took the form of direct payments of large sums to Bill Clinton for speaking fees, followed by favors by the State Dept.

The trouble with your case is it is all circumstantial. Foundation solicits money from foreign governments. US sells arms to foreign governments. Bill Clinton gives speeches for pay.

Those things could all be tied together, but they could be independent. All of them were already going on well before Hillary was secretary of state, for instance.

There was a murder last week in San Diego. You live in San Diego. Therefore you are the murderer. Or maybe the victim. Not sure which, but you are definitely involved, how could you not be?

barfo
 
Hard to say it any better, I do not agree with Bernie but he appears honest.
So from now on Hilliar (very inventive) will be referred to by me as:

"That bitch"

Those that are offended can suck one.

So don't ask me why, but a decided to turn on MTP this Sunday. And low and behold That bitch was giving an interview. I made the agonizing decision to watch. So a Greenpeace activist asks her about coal and fracking money and she immediately starts calling Bernie a liar.

Bitch!!

They didn't even bring up Sanders' name.

You DID take wall street money!
You DID take coal money!
You DID take fracking money!
You continue to take money from Corporate Corrections of America!

Then you go and site that TOOTHLESS bill Dodd-Frank as a notion to why Barack wasn't beholden to Goldman/ Sachs??

Who the FUCK do you think we are?

Yes! I've donated to Bernie because of what he offers ME in the form of change as a candidate.

And those corporations are donating to you (millions) because of what you can do for them.

You have SOLIDIFIED my stance against EVER awarding you with my vote...
 
The trouble with your case is it is all circumstantial. Foundation solicits money from foreign governments. US sells arms to foreign governments. Bill Clinton gives speeches for pay.

Those things could all be tied together, but they could be independent. All of them were already going on well before Hillary was secretary of state, for instance.

There was a murder last week in San Diego. You live in San Diego. Therefore you are the murderer. Or maybe the victim. Not sure which, but you are definitely involved, how could you not be?

barfo

SMH

Your bad analogies and logic doesn't make Hiliar taking bribes go away.
 
The trouble with your case is it is all circumstantial. Foundation solicits money from foreign governments. US sells arms to foreign governments. Bill Clinton gives speeches for pay.

Those things could all be tied together, but they could be independent. All of them were already going on well before Hillary was secretary of state, for instance.

There was a murder last week in San Diego. You live in San Diego. Therefore you are the murderer. Or maybe the victim. Not sure which, but you are definitely involved, how could you not be?

barfo
:huh:
 
The trouble with your case is it is all circumstantial. Foundation solicits money from foreign governments. US sells arms to foreign governments. Bill Clinton gives speeches for pay.

Those things could all be tied together, but they could be independent. All of them were already going on well before Hillary was secretary of state, for instance.

There was a murder last week in San Diego. You live in San Diego. Therefore you are the murderer. Or maybe the victim. Not sure which, but you are definitely involved, how could you not be?

barfo

Eh, it would be more like if Denny's wife received a sizable donation from some woman, and then Denny accidentally ran that person's husband over, killing him. It looks like an accident, but the sizable donation and the timing of the "accident" make it highly suspicious.
 
It would be more like there's blood all over Hilar, she's holding a bloody knife and a gun that's been fired multiple times. Both weapons have her fingerprints, but the corpse can't be found because Obama buried it. We know who's missing and when - and that Hiliar was there at that time.
 
Last edited:
While I don't trust That bitch as far as I can throw her (and he looks pretty heavy), we are going to have to do a lot better than circumstantial evidence to indict.

Lots of you have already tried her in the court of public opinion but lack strong evidence. You only have the "where there's smoke there's fire" evidence..
 
Why I don't trust fat bitch as far as I can throw her (and he looks pretty heavy) we are going to have to do a lot better than circumstantial evidence to indict.

Lots of you have already tried her in the court of public opinion but lack strong evidence. You only have the "where there's smoke there's fire" evidence..

I think there's plenty of actual evidence that she's a dishonest person, and for me that's enough. I don't think she's trustworthy, and I really wish that America would wake up and stop electing people who are dishonest. I think she would do literally anything to get elected President.
 
While I don't trust That bitch as far as I can throw her (and he looks pretty heavy), we are going to have to do a lot better than circumstantial evidence to indict.

Lots of you have already tried her in the court of public opinion but lack strong evidence. You only have the "where there's smoke there's fire" evidence..
The state department, DoJ, FBI and congress are all considering STRONG evidence. Why wast anyone's time and taxpayer dollars otherwise?
 
The state department, DoJ, FBI and congress are all considering STRONG evidence. Why wast anyone's time and taxpayer dollars otherwise?

You're asking why all of those departments would waste federal money and time?? Really?
 
You're asking why all of those departments would waste federal money and time?? Really?

I know the answer. You don't.

They're not wasting any time or money. They're figuring out which of multiple charges to bring, and they're being very careful to build an airtight case.

You seem to think she's a liar but think she's telling the truth about her criminal activity?

:crazy:
 
I know the answer. You don't.

They're not wasting any time or money. They're figuring out which of multiple charges to bring, and they're being very careful to build an airtight case.

You seem to think she's a liar but think she's telling the truth about her criminal activity?

:crazy:

I've never said anything about her being truthful. What I said is that you all have tried her in the court of public opinion and don't have a shred of evidence. Personally, I fucking hope she goes to prison. Then we'll have a Bernie Sanders presidency. All I'm saying is people in here tend to do this a lot where they seem to act like they have all the answers but really don't have any.
 
I've never said anything about her being truthful. What I said is that you all have tried her in the court of public opinion and don't have a shred of evidence. Personally, I fucking hope she goes to prison. Then we'll have a Bernie Sanders presidency. All I'm saying is people in here tend to do this a lot where they seem to act like they have all the answers but really don't have any.
There are 30,000+ shreds of evidence plus a grand jury established plus immunity granted to a key player in the whole thing. And more.

The obvious lie is that she didn't send any top secret info. Any moron would act all along as if every email contains important secrets. But then again, her story has changed to better fit the facts as those come out, each time showing her previous version of her story was lies upon lies.

The voters would be insane to elect any of the top two candidates of both parties.
 
The state department, DoJ, FBI and congress are all considering STRONG evidence. Why wast anyone's time and taxpayer dollars otherwise?

So, you are saying government doesn't waste taxpayer dollars?

Seems at odds with your usual position.

barfo
 
I think there's plenty of actual evidence that she's a dishonest person, and for me that's enough. I don't think she's trustworthy, and I really wish that America would wake up and stop electing people who are dishonest. I think she would do literally anything to get elected President.

And the rest of the candidates wouldn't do anything to get elected? Have you been paying any attention at all this year?

Let's suppose you are right and she's a 'dishonest person'. Does that necessarily mean that she'll be a bad president? Do you think honesty and success in office are highly correlated?

barfo
 
And the rest of the candidates wouldn't do anything to get elected? Have you been paying any attention at all this year?

Let's suppose you are right and she's a 'dishonest person'. Does that necessarily mean that she'll be a bad president? Do you think honesty and success in office are highly correlated?

barfo

I think dishonesty and an accepted level of scum and villainy in elected offices has led us to the predicament that we're currently in. Hillary seems to be a hilarious caricature of everything that is wrong with politicians. Trump is a hilarious caricature of the hateful Republican. Hillary is Dick Cheney. Hillary is Donald Rumsfeld. She is the kind of politician that is ruining our country. She does things that will have long lasting damage to our economy.
 
So, you are saying government doesn't waste taxpayer dollars?

Seems at odds with your usual position.

barfo

That's not what I said. It's whatever drugs you're on making voices in your head.
 
You don't know the answer.

Unless you've hacked into the FBI. Have you?

barfo

I know the answer. They know there have been crimes committed. Easy.
 
I think dishonesty and an accepted level of scum and villainy in elected offices has led us to the predicament that we're currently in.

What predicament are we currently in?

I'm not saying I disagree with you, I'm actually not sure what you are talking about. The state of the election, or the state of the country? Or something else?

Hillary seems to be a hilarious caricature of everything that is wrong with politicians. Trump is a hilarious caricature of the hateful Republican. Hillary is Dick Cheney. Hillary is Donald Rumsfeld. She is the kind of politician that is ruining our country. She does things that will have long lasting damage to our economy.

What things is it that she does, exactly, and how will they cause damage?

barfo
 
There are 30,000+ shreds of evidence plus a grand jury established plus immunity granted to a key player in the whole thing. And more.

The obvious lie is that she didn't send any top secret info. Any moron would act all along as if every email contains important secrets. But then again, her story has changed to better fit the facts as those come out, each time showing her previous version of her story was lies upon lies.

The voters would be insane to elect any of the top two candidates of both parties.

You say that about Bernie but it's proven that his formula works. Libertarianism has never been tried save a country called Somalia and you see how nonexistent government works over there...
 
And the rest of the candidates wouldn't do anything to get elected? Have you been paying any attention at all this year?

Let's suppose you are right and she's a 'dishonest person'. Does that necessarily mean that she'll be a bad president? Do you think honesty and success in office are highly correlated?

barfo

FDR was honest as they came. He was even honest about his attempt to stack the SCOTUS. He was so honest and good and proved that Democratic Socialism works that they hired him 3 times. Libertarianism has never worked in any country.
 
I know the answer. They know there have been crimes committed. Easy.

Why would you say that you knew the answer and no one else did? That's just silly. I believe Hillary is guilty. But since it hasn't been found out yet that doesn't mean I'm going to go off spouting like I know. Because realistically Denny you don't know. You only know what we all know.
 
You say that about Bernie but it's proven that his formula works. Libertarianism has never been tried save a country called Somalia and you see how nonexistent government works over there...

Somalia isn't Libertarian anything. It's anarchy. A YUUUUGE difference.

Bernie's formula makes countries eventually look like Detroit.
 
Why would you say that you knew the answer and no one else did? That's just silly. I believe Hillary is guilty. But since it hasn't been found out yet that doesn't mean I'm going to go off spouting like I know. Because realistically Denny you don't know. You only know what we all know.

Yeah, like OJ was innocent.

We know.
 
FDR was honest as they came. He was even honest about his attempt to stack the SCOTUS. He was so honest and good and proved that Democratic Socialism works that they hired him 3 times. Libertarianism has never worked in any country.

Libertarianism built this country. It worked great until FDR.
 
Somalia isn't Libertarian anything. It's anarchy. A YUUUUGE difference.

Bernie's formula makes countries eventually look like Detroit.

You're full of shit. Go look at it Sweden. Go look at Finland. Go look at Switzerland. You really trolling when you say that crap.
 
Libertarianism built this country. It worked great until FDR.

Trolling?

We've never had libertarianism in this country.

It was capitalism brought us child labor. GTFO with that crap.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top