Driew
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 2,938
- Likes
- 3,077
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Here's a typical offensive possession for Portland: Steve Blake dribbles around for 14 seconds while getting six picks that he fails to use, then dumps it in the post to LaMarcus Aldridge, who shoots an 18-foot turnaround jumper, or gives it to Roy, who makes some breathtaking awesome move for a score. If they miss, they usually rebound it and do it again. Surprisingly, this works, but it's definitely not entertaining.
I used to be the exact same way until about a year ago. Then I realised that sport never ends.I'll take a boring win over an exciting loss any day - that's just me.
I love watching the Thunder play. Durant is a transcendent talent, Westbrook hustles his ass off, they play hard, they play fast and even though they make mistakes and don't always win, it's entertaining at least.
It's all subjective, but I totally agree with the article's premise. Fast hoops with athletic aggressive play and movement is fun to watch. Slow iso basketball with no motion and a heavy dose of jump shots is kind of boring.
They've got us spot on.
I used to be the exact same way until about a year ago. Then I realised that sport never ends.
So we win a game? There's always the next game.
So we win a championship? There's always another season.
So we have more championships than any other team? They'll catch up eventually.
Sport never ends. There is never any overall winner. So we may as well play an entertaining game, and have fun watching.
I thought the Blazers were fun to watch when everybody was healthy. Big time freak in Oden inside, exceptional athleticism with Outlaw and Batum, and fancy moves on offense from Rudy.
Of course, everybody was bitching about Outlaw back then, so what do I know.

winning is fun, but would you honestly call the style of play imminently watchable for a non-fan? I'm neither a fan of the Warriors or the Bulls, but if I had to pick one or the other to watch for the sake of enjoyment, it would not be the Bulls.
Well, there are two ways to enjoy sports, I find.
Then, of course, there are the unfair teams who encapsulate both spectacle and art of execution like the Jordan/Pippen Bulls, the Showtime Lakers, the Bird/McHale Celtics and such.
I don't think there's been a Phil Jackson-coached team that hasn't been both (well, maybe the Bulls in the year Jordan un-retired, when Horace Grant had left and when Ron Harper was glued to the bench). THAT'S unfair.
Where would the Drexler/Porter Blazers fit?
I don't think there's been a Phil Jackson-coached team that hasn't been both (well, maybe the Bulls in the year Jordan un-retired, when Horace Grant had left and when Ron Harper was glued to the bench). THAT'S unfair.
Where would the Drexler/Porter Blazers fit?
Agreed. One way is to enjoy is while getting a full-body massage from the supermodels.

I forget what the other way is.
and loves okc....
calls us boring other then roy. man... okc is turning out to be everything we thought we would be
blazers #21
okc #4
all u need to know
Arsenal FC.
Oh dear.FC Barca.
I thought you loved me!Yeah, I thought you knew and liked soccer.![]()
I thought you loved me!
