Fairly-Hard
Former Member Gone New!
- Joined
- May 2, 2021
- Messages
- 9,062
- Likes
- 7,413
- Points
- 113
It seems to me the refs are calling more fouls "Non Shooting" as well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
because the officials are interpenetrating the new rules poorly? ....which could have easily been predicted...and was?
look at this, Dame's rate of FGA's at the rim:
View attachment 41421
and again, his FT rate progression:
View attachment 41422
in other words, Dame's FGA at the rim this year are 119% of his career mark, and 137% of his mark last season. Yet, his FT rate is 67% of his career mark and 62% of his mark last season
that those two metrics are headed so dramatically in opposite directions might just be coincidence. But that seems like a mighty tall coincidence considering the rule change and what we've seen so far, this season, in the NBA
by the way, his FTA's/possession are 59% of last season
so I guess the question is, which you kind of already answered, is Dame one of those players who was egregiously using unnatural moves to draw fouls? My answer is no....and that dovetails back to the rule change being a bad one because it was too damn broad and made the officials drastically over-compensate in their judgement calls
Or there is another reason; Dame is playing like shit and the fault lies with Dame.
Yeah, if it's impacting dame getting to the line that much there is probably too much being missed...Dame is shooting like shit from three, but he isn't driving any differently than past seasons (except he's doing it more). The last 2 games he's averaged 36 minutes, and he's shot 4 total FT's. Last season it would have been 15 FT's in 2 games. Dame certainly looks for whistles like most stars, but he's never really used unnatural moves to draw fouls, not like Harden, Young, and Doncic
Okay, I was with you up until that las line. I usually think of soccer as about as exciting as sloth porn, but I have to admit that this play was from the recent Timbers match was pretty impressive:
Yes. This makes the most sense to me as well. There is a lot more contact, and it's going to make normal sized players far less effective.best gauge is FT rate, which is FTA/FGA, not necessarily raw FTA's because minutes and role can vary a lot, season to season
the most revealing numbers there, IMO, is when you look at those impacted most, it is mostly the smaller players, like Dame. I think that's a function of the officials allowing a lot more contact because they are overcompensating so they aren't "suckered" into falling for the types of plays they are trying to eliminate. It will be easier to knock the smaller, shorter players out of sync
I think it's statistically impossible to explain away the dramatic drop in Dame's FG% at the rim, from .631 last season to .528 this season, without conceding Dame absorbing much more contact on his shots at the rim as a big factor
Guards are getting screwed. If Nurkic weren't so finesse around the rim he'd be far better off.
I agree, but I really hope not. I like the new rules to not reward flops by players on offense. I like this balance to give defense more of a chance to be physical/aggressive.
otoh, his foul rate is at a career lowGuards are getting screwed. If Nurkic weren't so finesse around the rim he'd be far better off.
I hope it does get fixed because it's a hackfest right now and less adept defensive minded players are loving it. They just get to slap at the ball and if they get someone's arm they still get the stop or they just get to body check someone driving through the lane and grab a dislodged ball for another stop.The "not rewarding flopping" is what the rules are intended to address. That's not what I meant. What I meant is that actual contact by the defense (not fake contact that the offensive player creates) is now being not called for fouls, which wasn't the intent of the rules. That part, I believe, will get fixed.
agree, and I think the refs are/will adjust their calls on the guards going to the hoop as the season goes on. The game to me anyway sure seems more physical.that's a pretty stupid comment...or at least it leaves out so much context it's worthless....which is close enough to stupid to count as such....IMO
first off, Dame was 9th in FTA last season (while being 7th in minutes); and he was 8th in FTA the season before (while being 1st in minutes). So no, he doesn't rely on FT's the most
secondly, do the new foul rules mean players don't commit fouls? Do they mean officials are perfectly interpreting the new rules? Why is it that the smaller, quicker players seem to be those most 'harmed' by the new rules?
when those new rules were being analyzed I saw dozens of examples of the kind motion & action that was targeted. I don't recall Dame being used an example one time
Hmm. What team invented modern smallball? The Warriors, wasn't it? Let's check in to see how they're struggling...Lol to the small ball then. Wonder if Olshe knew that when he was building dwarfs team.
Hmm. What team invented modern smallball? The Warriors, wasn't it? Let's check in to see how they're struggling...
Hmm. What team invented modern smallball? The Warriors, wasn't it? Let's check in to see how they're struggling...
their 3 championship teams and this season:
How much taller than Monta is current starter Jordan Poole?let's not forget it all started when the Warriors picked one of Curry/Monta Eliis and traded the other
So instead of an undersized small forward they have an undersized center. That makes ALL the difference.Warriors "small ball" means downsizing the big men to the 6'7''-6'8'' range, not playing three midgets. Curry is the only actually small (for basketball) player and he plays a position where smaller players are common.
