The optimism (this season) about the Blazers is ludicrous

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Carlito

Carlito

Suspended
Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Messages
934
Likes
9
Points
0
Seeing the word playoffs in a few articles/threads about this years roster is a bad joke. Ive seen some here trash the lakers bench! The blazers bench wouldn't start in d-league. I do feel they have nice pieces (love lillard) but c'mon fellas this isn't even a 25 win roster no less a playoff team. I feel like the media is trying to hype the fans to sell tickets and preying on the gullible ones.

As is now this is a top 5 lotto pick which we need. Let's try to be realistic here. Hopefully they exceed expectations but they would have to be injury free and have a hidden star on bench who emerges.
 
This is why not one person in this place likes you one bit! You bring up some very valid points, it's just the way you type them. Take a step back and breathe and quit comin' on here all crazy style. You'll get these people respect if you just tone it down a tad.
 
For example, you could have titled this thread........ Why are some of you so optimistic about the Blazers this season? or Why so much optimism?
 
wait, so I shouldn't have bet my life savings on them winning the title this year?
 
I agree, it's ludicrous. While I would take the over on Vegas's current over/under (35.5), I wouldn't dare talk playoffs.
 
Your optimism is ludicrous!
 
Me and BC.

images
 
You're Dark Helmet. I'm Colonel Sanders. MM is Major Asshole...with SPD as his cousin, Gunner's Mate 3rd Class Philip Asshole.
 
meh, I just want to see how these guys bond in a game situation. have been a fan long enough to take the ups along with the downs..
 
DaLincolnJones said:
meh, I just want to see how these guys bond in a game situation. have been a fan long enough to take the ups along with the downs..
Click to expand...

right on, I am looking forward to more entertaining Bball as opposed to Nate boring ball. I do not expect playoffs at all, just want to see the guys improve as the season progresses, especially Lillard and maybe Meyers later in the year, it's going to take a while folks.
 
We're certainly not going to make the playoffs, but I think our bench isn't too terrible. I actually think our bench could take the Lakers' bench. The reason most people trash it is because they don't know anything about Claver and Freeland.

I think our bench has the potential to be a really good defensive "bench mob" like Sacramento had back in the day. But we can't afford to lose ALL our guards. (Things'll be better when we trade for Varejao...)
 
Last edited:
I'm hoping for the best but I'm realistic about this roster.

Developing future core players is key this season.

We're definitely going to be a doormat.

Hopefully it'll 'pay off' and we'll be in position to land 'Bazz or Zeller next summer.

This year will be eerily similar to the 2005 or 2006 season.
 
Carlito said:
Seeing the word playoffs in a few articles/threads about this years roster is a bad joke. Ive seen some here trash the lakers bench! The blazers bench wouldn't start in d-league. I do feel they have nice pieces (love lillard) but c'mon fellas this isn't even a 25 win roster no less a playoff team. I feel like the media is trying to hype the fans to sell tickets and preying on the gullible ones.

As is now this is a top 5 lotto pick which we need. Let's try to be realistic here. Hopefully they exceed expectations but they would have to be injury free and have a hidden star on bench who emerges.
Click to expand...

Speaking of Ludacris... the Blazers are going to look real pretty...

 
Yep. Kind of like the Oakland A's winning the west. Absurd. Ludicrous. They're a last place team.
 
crandc said:
Yep. Kind of like the Oakland A's winning the west. Absurd. Ludicrous. They're a last place team.
Click to expand...

Not to be rude, and its none of my business. Feel free to ignore if you so choose, but..

you are a gay female ( from everything I have been led to believe), speak of a partner etc, comfortable with your community etc, fantastic. But why are so many of your avatars guys?
 
Did I miss someone being optimistic? What..... did one or two people predict "possible" playoffs?
From what I have read everyone does seem to be realistic about this year. Maybe a few fans are "hopeful" that if this. that , and the other thing can occur....just maybe we can slide into the 8th spot. But the vast majority of Blazer fans are predicting right where the experts are guessing. And by experts I mean Vegas.
 
DaLincolnJones said:
Not to be rude, and its none of my business. Feel free to ignore if you so choose, but..

you are a gay female ( from everything I have been led to believe), speak of a partner etc, comfortable with your community etc, fantastic. But why are so many of your avatars guys?
Click to expand...

Offended by the objectification of women, and trying to retaliate. I wonder about it too...
 
I'm curious...

How common is it for a team with a legit top 15 player to finish in the bottom 5 of the league? (Let's just assume, for now, that LMA is top 15).

Does it happen very often?
 
Aldridge, Matthews and Batum will start and play big minutes of course.

The decider will be Stotts, and whether the season

1. is wasted trying to win games playing the extremely weak veterans we have (= no playoffs and no improvement)

or...

2. our more talented draft picks are allowed to start and play deep minutes despite their learning curve (could make the playoffs and might even be very good by then)

Nate religiously followed #1, and we saw where it got us. Is Stotts a difference? So far there is no indication that he is.
 
blazerboy30 said:
I'm curious...

How common is it for a team with a legit top 15 player to finish in the bottom 5 of the league? (Let's just assume, for now, that LMA is top 15).

Does it happen very often?
Click to expand...

Ask Donald Sterling.
 
DaLincolnJones said:
Not to be rude, and its none of my business. Feel free to ignore if you so choose, but..

you are a gay female ( from everything I have been led to believe), speak of a partner etc, comfortable with your community etc, fantastic. But why are so many of your avatars guys?
Click to expand...

crandc's avatars are all of gay men. Not the average normal looking out of shape gay guys, nor the flamboyantly exhibitionistic gay guys.

I suspect she only uses the studly athletic model type gay guys in an attempt to give you an unwanted and embarrassing erection. :dunno:
 
MARIS61 said:
crandc's avatars are all of gay men. Not the average normal looking out of shape gay guys, nor the flamboyantly exhibitionistic gay guys.

I suspect she only uses the studly athletic model type gay guys in an attempt to give you an unwanted and embarrassing erection. :dunno:
Click to expand...

The more scantily clad women in everyone else's avatars, the more she uses scantily clad guys in her avatars.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

ABM
File Under: Most Ludicrous Idea Of The Year
2
Replies
31
Views
1K
Jade Falcon
Jade Falcon
GrandpaBlaze
Is this how?
Replies
5
Views
641
craigehlo
craigehlo
MIXUM
The depth the blazers once had is gone and canzano agrees
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
Shooter
Shooter
MIXUM
Blazers are pure speculation at this point
Replies
4
Views
512
Nate Dogg
Nate Dogg
Natebishop3
This is the difference...
Replies
18
Views
760
shamelessblazer
S

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top