MickZagger
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 37,564
- Likes
- 16,575
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The U.S. projects conservativism all over Earth. They hate us for the massive unnecessary killing.
3 million in Vietnam, 2 million in Iraq, after awhile some complainer pipes up and the world hates you.
Massive?
wait, so that makes it the right decision?
That would be like saying the Miami Heat decided to bench LeBron and give Mike Miller all his minutes, and the rest of the NBA is "relieved" about it so that makes it right.
Right, it's us against the world. Every other country is our enemy, and what's good for them must therefore be bad for us.
barfo
wait, so that makes it the right decision?
That would be like saying the Miami Heat decided to bench LeBron and give Mike Miller all his minutes, and the rest of the NBA is "relieved" about it so that makes it right.
Think about it again in terms of 44Thrilla's post comparing the US to the Miami Heat.
Teams in the NBA compete against one another, as well as with one another. They are not necessarily enemies (though some teams have some seriously bad blood and seem to have more intense battles). For the most part, NBA teams all know they're in it together, and each team has a role. Someone has to play the winner, someone plays the loser (this is where I'd like to say that the comparison ends, as in life, and a world, why can't we all win? But I've yet to see this possibility in our world).
I think the analogy is seriously flawed. One country is not crowned as champion each year. There is not a requirement that there be one and only one winner. There can be multiple winners. There can be no winners.
If our economy crashes, that doesn't help the rest of the world win. If China crashes and burns, that doesn't make us the winner.
barfo

No, of course not. It was well within the acceptable amount of unnecessary killings.
The analogy doesn't fit 100% - oh no!!!
The analogy must be 100% or it fails!! Rawr!
If China loses, sometimes it helps us, sometimes it hurts. Think about the playoffs, man. Sometimes, a better team that you'd play in the next round gets bumped out, and it opens your opporunity for further success.
I don't really care - I'm just carrying this through as a joke. You're either doing the same, or you're mind only works in extreme literal ways, and that's why this isn't processing.

The Right just demonstrated conclusively in the run-up to the election that they are delusional. So maybe everyone is delusional.
barfo
I think the analogy is seriously flawed. One country is not crowned as champion each year. There is not a requirement that there be one and only one winner. There can be multiple winners. There can be no winners.
It is interesting though how some prioritize the competitive portion of economies over the cooperative nature of economies and vice versa. Also interesting is the implication that Romney is LeBron and Obama is Miller, when both are obviously Chris Bosh.![]()
