Science The Webb Space Telescope is 100x as powerful as the Hubble. It will change astronomy.

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

No clue who Kenneth Hamm is, but if we can't look back in time, every story in his precious bible is also bunk because it paint a picture from back in time with words, no?
He says we can only get history and cosmology from his bible.
He is a well known advocate of teaching bible in science class. Runs a "college" and a "museum" that are fact free. Works with politicians to get schools to not teach biology.
 
uKYFv2I.jpg
 
James Webb’s Role in Purge of LGBTQ+ NASA Workers Fuels Push to Name Telescope After Harriet Tubman

 
No clue who Kenneth Hamm is, but if we can't look back in time, every story in his precious bible is also bunk because it paint a picture from back in time with words, no?
I believe his point is that we can't know anything unless man was there to observe it.

Here are some clips of him debating with Bill Nye


Here is the whole debate
 
I believe his point is that we can't know anything unless man was there to observe it.

Here are some clips of him debating with Bill Nye


Here is the whole debate

Solipsistic arguments are always the laziest. It's an updated take on the old "if a tree falls in the woods...." trope.
 
James Webb’s Role in Purge of LGBTQ+ NASA Workers Fuels Push to Name Telescope After Harriet Tubman



What does Harriet Tubman have to do with space?????

Why not name it after Katherine Johnson if you're going to go that route...... some of these people, I swear to god.
 


Webb captures a cosmic tarantula

Thousands of never-before-seen young stars are spotted in a stellar nursery called 30 Doradus, captured by the NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope. Nicknamed the Tarantula Nebula for the appearance of its dusty filaments in previous telescope images, the nebula has long been a favourite for astronomers studying star formation. In addition to young stars, Webb reveals distant background galaxies, as well as the detailed structure and composition of the nebula’s gas and dust.

At only 161,000 light-years away in the Large Magellanic Cloud galaxy, the Tarantula Nebula is the largest and brightest star-forming region in the Local Group, the galaxies nearest to our Milky Way. It is home to the hottest, most massive stars known. Astronomers focused three of Webb’s high-resolution infrared instruments on the Tarantula.

Viewed with Webb’s Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam), the region resembles a burrowing tarantula’s home, lined with its silk. The nebula’s cavity centred in the NIRCam image has been hollowed out by blistering radiation from a cluster of massive young stars, which sparkle pale blue in the image. Only the densest surrounding areas of the nebula resist erosion by these stars’ powerful stellar winds, forming pillars that appear to point back toward the cluster. These pillars contain forming protostars, which will eventually emerge from their dusty cocoons and take their turn shaping the nebula.

Webb’s Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) caught one very young star doing just that. Astronomers previously thought this star might be a bit older and already in the process of clearing out a bubble around itself. However, NIRSpec showed that the star was only just beginning to emerge from its pillar and still maintained an insulating cloud of dust around itself. Without Webb’s high-resolution spectra at infrared wavelengths, this episode of star formation-in-action could not have been revealed.

The region takes on a different appearance when viewed in the longer infrared wavelengths detected by Webb’s Tarantula Nebula – NIRSpec IFU
One of the reasons the Tarantula Nebula is interesting to astronomers is that the nebula has a similar type of chemical composition as the gigantic star-forming regions observed at the universe’s “cosmic noon,” when the cosmos was only a few billion years old and star formation was at its peak. Star-forming regions in our Milky Way galaxy are not producing stars at the same furious rate as the Tarantula Nebula, and have a different chemical composition. This makes the Tarantula the closest (i.e., easiest to see in detail) example of what was happening in the universe as it reached its brilliant high noon.

Webb will provide astronomers the opportunity to compare and contrast observations of star formation in the Tarantula Nebula with the telescope’s deep observations of distant galaxies from the actual era of cosmic noon.

Despite humanity’s thousands of years of stargazing, the star formation process still holds many mysteries – many of them due to our previous inability to get crisp images of what was happening behind the thick clouds of stellar nurseries. Webb has already begun revealing a universe never seen before, and is only getting started on rewriting the stellar creation story.
 
I’d rather they use the money for all of this on things that benefit society. Feed people for instance. Provide housing. Pay teachers more. Pretty pictures doesn’t seem important enough.
 
I’d rather they use the money for all of this on things that benefit society. Feed people for instance. Provide housing. Pay teachers more. Pretty pictures doesn’t seem important enough.
They can do all of that without diverting anything from any sciences. In fact, investing in those sciences has paid dividends.

Estimates of the return on investment in the space program range from $7 for every $1 spent on the Apollo Program to $40 for every $1 spent on space development today . The critical factor driving productivity growth is technology.

https://space.nss.org/settlement/na... on,driving productivity growth is technology.
 
They can do all of that without diverting anything from any sciences. In fact, investing in those sciences has paid dividends.



https://space.nss.org/settlement/nasa/spaceresvol4/newspace3.html#:~:text=Estimates of the return on,driving productivity growth is technology.
Thats helpful. Sounds like a piece written by astronomers or space people. Would we not have these things from "going to space" without going to space? Maybe. Maybe we only can generate small refrigerators because we launched ourselves into space. I dont know. I think we spend too much on the military too. Just sooooo much money and meanwhile people in Mississippi dont have water. Kids live on streets. Our education system sucks ass. Could we pay for all that AND go to space, sure. But wouldn't it be great if they froze spending on military (and in my mind NASA) for a year and pumped it into schools and homeless? I'll take that instead of the HD pictures of Saturn's rings.
 
Thats helpful. Sounds like a piece written by astronomers or space people. Would we not have these things from "going to space" without going to space? Maybe. Maybe we only can generate small refrigerators because we launched ourselves into space. I dont know. I think we spend too much on the military too. Just sooooo much money and meanwhile people in Mississippi dont have water. Kids live on streets. Our education system sucks ass. Could we pay for all that AND go to space, sure. But wouldn't it be great if they froze spending on military (and in my mind NASA) for a year and pumped it into schools and homeless? I'll take that instead of the HD pictures of Saturn's rings.
Lack of money isn't why we aren't helping those people. We have more than enough.

We don't help those people because it makes us feel better that there are people below us. That's the honest to goodness truth of it.

We can't give homeless people housing, even though it costs us 4x more to allow them to be homeless. Why? We know it works. We have seen it done multiple times in multiple places.

So why?

Same thing with the war on drugs.

That's what it all comes down to. Those kids who need help can't compete with my kids so, that's a good thing for me. And then they'll be cheap labor I can exploit to become a millionaire.

Healthcare. Same thing. We could give Healthcare to everybody in the country, for less than we currently spend. Canada currently does it for less than our government currently spends on healthcare here in the US.

We can't have that. Because... Eff them. That's why. I got mine.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
Let us not forget the US spends more on military than the rest of the world combined. And most of it is not going to help Ukraine.
And giant tax cuts for the rich that the rest of us pay for in reduced services.
 
Let us not forget the US spends more on military than the rest of the world combined. And most of it is not going to help Ukraine.
And giant tax cuts for the rich that the rest of us pay for in reduced services.
This is true. And if that allows us to retain being the world's reserve currency and control shipping lanes while bringing the rest of the world into a clean energy power future of abundance that would be fine.

But we've been pulling back from that since we won the cold war.
 
Last edited:
I’d rather they use the money for all of this on things that benefit society. Feed people for instance. Provide housing. Pay teachers more. Pretty pictures doesn’t seem important enough.

I've heard this general opinion many times over the years.

NASA's budget for 2021 was a little over $23.2 billion, which represented around 0.35% of the $6.8 trillion the US spent in the fiscal year.

Of the .35% that goes to NASA, about 1.5% to 4% was spent on the Webb telescope yearly.

Here's a good article about the benefits of astronomy. It's important that the US try to stay a leader in science and technology.

There are a lot of things wrong with this country, NASA isn't one of them.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top