This is what actual corruption looks like...

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Apparently you don't know it, living in your Hillary hate bubble, but those on the left aren't fans of Comey.

barfo

It seems nobody is, except Hiliar and her sycophants. At least when it comes to him sweeping her crimes under the rug.
 
It seems nobody is, except Hiliar and her sycophants. At least when it comes to him sweeping her crimes under the rug.

No. The feeling on that side is that since there were no crimes, he stepped over the line by giving his personal opinion on the case. That's what your article says, anyway.

barfo
 
Hillary took the black Lincoln Continental limo concept and opted for a black mini van?

It's a customized ambulance that follows her everywhere with a medical staff on board.

But that's completely normal, nothing to see here. :dupnoevil:
 
No. The feeling on that side is that since there were no crimes, he stepped over the line by giving his personal opinion on the case. That's what your article says, anyway.

barfo

That and the "feeling" that prosecutors don't want to back him.
 
NBC News

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/201...s-health-scare-9-unanswered-questions-n646551

Clinton's campaign appears to have, at best, withheld information from the public and — at worst — misled them by aggressively batting down "conspiracy theories" that her coughing fit was anything more than allergies. Opponents are already seeing the incident as proof of their claims that Clinton has been hiding health issues. And others may now be more incredulous of the campaign's statements on her health.

(LOL, hiding health issues is all? We all know it's because of a YouTube video)
 
Last edited:
donors-dnc-ambassadors-575x895.jpg
 
And what is this list supposed to mean, Denny?

barfo
 
You understand that ambassadorships have been used as rewards for political contributions forever, by both parties.
Assuming that your claim of a quid-pro-quo here is true, this is actually a big improvement - instead of buying political advertisements, the ambassadors-to-be are making contributions to a charity.
Not clear to me, though, that the situation is as you claim, since ambassadors are appointed by the president, not the secretary of state.

barfo
 
You understand that ambassadorships have been used as rewards for political contributions forever, by both parties.
Assuming that your claim of a quid-pro-quo here is true, this is actually a big improvement - instead of buying political advertisements, the ambassadors-to-be are making contributions to a charity.
Not clear to me, though, that the situation is as you claim, since ambassadors are appointed by the president, not the secretary of state.

barfo

It's OK if someone else did it?

What horrible logic once again.

This is what actual corruption looks like.
 
It's OK if someone else did it?

I never said or implied it was ok.

I merely pointed out that there is a long history here.

What horrible logic once again.

Yes, your logic is horrible. If you want to call it logic?

This is what actual corruption looks like.

This is what someone leaping to conclusions looks like.

barfo
 
The bad logic:

Everyone does it, so the last guy who did it was in the right.

That it has anything to do with the state department or the criminal who used to run it. Of course we can expect more of the same. And she did give jobs to foundation donors - highly questionable ones.

That these are charitable contributions. They were donating to Obama's election campaign.

Not sure you have a clue.
 
The bad logic:

Everyone does it, so the last guy who did it was in the right.

Nobody said that other than you.

That it has anything to do with the state department or the criminal who used to run it. Of course we can expect more of the same. And she did give jobs to foundation donors - highly questionable ones.

That these are charitable contributions. They were donating to Obama's election campaign.

Not sure you have a clue.

Ah. You are right, I got that wrong. You have been on such a hillary hate fest the last few months that i just assumed that your list was clinton foundation donors.

If it is campaign contributions, then yes, looks like business as usual. Just to be clear, since you also assume things that aren't said: that doesn't make it right. But it does make it not news.

barfo
 
Nobody said that other than you.

"Everyone does it." -- barfo

Ah. You are right, I got that wrong. You have been on such a hillary hate fest the last few months that i just assumed that your list was clinton foundation donors.

If it is campaign contributions, then yes, looks like business as usual. Just to be clear, since you also assume things that aren't said: that doesn't make it right. But it does make it not news.

barfo

So you repeat the business as usual.

It's quite obviously quid pro quo. Your kind wants to raise taxes to pay for that sort of thing, and Obama's debt.
 
Your kind wants to raise taxes to pay for that sort of thing, and Obama's debt.

My kind wants to raise taxes to appoint ambassadors?

I'll have to speak to my kind about that, it doesn't seem to make sense.

barfo
 
My kind wants to raise taxes to appoint ambassadors?

I'll have to speak to my kind about that, it doesn't seem to make sense.

barfo

If we're sending "ambassadors" who aren't qualified, other than big campaign donors, then yes, we shouldn't be sending them.
 
Well, I say they're all crooks, you defend them and want to give them more power and money.

But a Libertarian wouldn't be crooked? Really? So if Gary somehow got elected, he'd be pure as the driven snow?

I'm the sane one.

There's no sane one here.

barfo
 
If we're sending "ambassadors" who aren't qualified, other than big campaign donors, then yes, we shouldn't be sending them.

Right... where does raising taxes figure into that?

barfo
 
But a Libertarian wouldn't be crooked? Really? So if Gary somehow got elected, he'd be pure as the driven snow?



There's no sane one here.

barfo

No, a real Libertarian wouldn't be crooked.

Really.
 
What pays for these ambassadors? Not Obama.

WE DO.

Right - and we always have. So what's this about raising taxes? Are there a bunch more countries this year?

barfo
 
Right - and we always have. So what's this about raising taxes? Are there a bunch more countries this year?

barfo

There's not enough money to pay for them because of the debt your kind ran up.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top