This needs to stop (1 Viewer)

[PapaG]

At this point this thread needs to stop. Mods?

The only mod in this thread is extending it by calling out posters by name in his posts. :MARIS61:

Posted by NateBishop (Global Moderator)

I could have said "pretty please with sugar on top". It wouldn't have mattered. PapaG, Eric (El Presidente), and Jlprk would have done their thing.

I think he's drunk on both power and booze.

 

[julius]

jeebus, get your panties in a bunch why don't ya?

speaking from personal experience, that isn't a fun thing to do.

 

[PapaG]

speaking from personal experience, that isn't a fun thing to do.

Tell the story! Then I can pick it apart and say you're full of shit.

 

[Natebishop3]

The only mod in this thread is extending it by calling out posters by name in his posts. :MARIS61:



I think he's drunk on both power and booze.

Haha im so drunk on power that I haven't edited a single post in the month or so that I've been back. That definitely sounds like a guy drunk on power.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

 

[PapaG]

Haha im so drunk on power that I haven't edited a single post in the month or so that I've been back. That definitely sounds like a guy drunk on power.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

Calm down, NateBishop. Deep breaths...

You're validating my post that you feature in your signature though, aren't you?

 

[jlprk]

I could have said "pretty please with sugar on top". It wouldn't have mattered. PapaG, Eric (El Presidente), and Jlprk would have done their thing.

I posted 4 times. 3 were pearls of humor and 1 was a ruby of sarcasm against crandc police stating. I never even disagreed with you! You didn't do anything wrong.

It's just that kicking you around is so much fun.

 

[Natebishop3]

Calm down, NateBishop. Deep breaths...

You're validating my post that you feature in your signature though, aren't you?

Dude Im in a great mood. I've got a second interview for a new job coming up. Its just fun watching you try to get a rise out of me

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

 

[SecretAgentMan]

Wow, very small men trying to make a big deal out of a simple post with good intentions. Grow up kids.

 

[BLAZINGGIANTS]

Wow, very small men trying to make a big deal out of a simple post with good intentions. Grow up kids.

True dat.

But then again.... before I even entered the thread, I saw the title, and was like, "Oh, hell yeah. Someone is getting into trouble or causing chaos."

Then I started reading the OP, and was like, "WTF? This is sadly disappointing." Nate coulda gone with a softer title, like, "Reminder: Policy regarding items from other sources" or some shit like that. But some people nitpick so much, they'd find a way to pull some shit outta that title, anyway.

 

[EL PRESIDENTE]

its a step back from the usual non-chalant, free spirited mods and one that beckons to the day of the hall monitor.

 

[BLAZINGGIANTS]

its a step back from the usual non-chalant, free spirited mods and one that beckons to the day of the hall monitor.

Shut up, Eric! :MARIS61:

 

[Denny Crane]

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/06/fair-use-defense/

That said, we have a couple of lawyers who might advise against posting entire articles. I know I'm guilty of it on occasion.

Personally, I'm not so concerned about posting stuff that is readily available for free on numerous sites. We don't profit from posting that sort of thing here, and it is pure discussion.

Posting stuff you have to pay for so others don't is definitely harming (ESPN Insider) someone's livelihood.

 

[jlprk]

I like the thread title, except that he should have added ",fuckers" at the end. The cute exclamation mark icon is a bonus, a treat for the eyes.

 

[EL PRESIDENTE]

I think what bothers me is it sounds like a corporate memo.

 

[BLAZINGGIANTS]

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/06/fair-use-defense/

That said, we have a couple of lawyers who might advise against posting entire articles. I know I'm guilty of it on occasion.

Personally, I'm not so concerned about posting stuff that is readily available for free on numerous sites. We don't profit from posting that sort of thing here, and it is pure discussion.

Posting stuff you have to pay for so others don't is definitely harming (ESPN Insider) someone's livelihood.

Why? Most of that stuff is pure crap and a waste of money, and the information is usually fairly easy to find elsewhere.

It's like me undercutting my local drug dealer cuz I get my shit for free.

 

[BLAZINGGIANTS]

I think what bothers me is it sounds like a corporate memo.

What bothers me is that there are no nudie pics from Bobo's threads!

 

[PapaG]

As I said repeatedly, Righthaven....

Nice thread though, NateBishop. Such gusto behind it! I bet you felt amazing while posting it!

RAWR

 

[PapaG]

So ... it kind of needs to stop, but not really?

Great thread, NateBishop. It was amusing for a few hours.

 

[MickZagger]

Actually I'd have been fine, except I hadn't seen your signature, which is blatantly trolling me. Seeing it, it's obvious part of the reason you wanted to be a mod again is so you could have some sort of authority in your life.

It's cute, in a creepy way.

Mod envy?

 

[jlprk]

Too exotic. I think he just has regular penis envy.

 

[MickZagger]

Too exotic. I think he just has regular penis envy.

 

[3RA1N1AC]

genesis 2:19

i give thee all seed bearing fruit, animals, and internet forums to do with as you wish. go forth and copy and paste whatever the fuck you want, or i shall smite thy cock into smithereens

and it was good

 

[julius]

Tell the story! Then I can pick it apart and say you're full of shit.

Well, it was my panties that were full of shit...but I digress...

 

[BoBoBREWSKI]

Close this thread.

 

[Mediocre Man]

Close this thread.

Did you steal that from somewhere?

 

[PapaG]

Close this thread.

"This needs to stop."