- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 73,114
- Likes
- 10,945
- Points
- 113
I'd look TOR, BOS, GSW and CHI, but for slightly different reasons. CHI's owners aren't known for being profligate spenders (Denny can correct me if I'm way off-base), and I think that they'd make a deal in order to stay below the apron and maintain flexibility while staying in the first tier (0-5M above the line) of tax increments. The flexibility aspect is similar for GSW and BOS, while TOR would be a great place to try to pluck a 2015 or 2017 first to give them some cap savings if our big FA plans didn't pan out.
I think they accidentally paid the tax this season. They had deals to dump Rip Hamilton's contract to get under the LT threshold but teams were asking for a draft pick and the Bulls decided to pay the tax instead.
Lots of talk about amnesty on Boozer. Fans don't like his defense much. He's been remarkably healthy, though, and I think he's a very good player if used right. I also think if they do use amnesty on him, they'll save money but have only the $5M trade exception to replace him, which I don't think can be done that easily. And if they use the TE, they'll pay the tax


): moving up in draft if required for a stud SG (probably Oladipo, but still looking) or Noel if you can pull it off keeping LMA and Lillard, bringing over Papanikolou, trying to get Maynor with the room exception, and either getting a needle-moving big or looking at what LMA would bring back in trade. It's not time to panic and give him away, but we are only 20 months away from the last time we can trade him for something without him walking away for nothing. I think it's worth exploring. But I haven't done the analysis to see what's even do-able, much less realistic or probable.