Politics To the Sofas... to the Walz! Till the VP Debate...

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Trying to spin the story that Trump had nothing to do with happened on Jan. 6 is such a loser for his campaign.

Vance needed a better approach to that answer than "Trump just told them to peacefully protest." That was far from intellectually honest.
 
Phatguysrule said:
Have yet to hear him say something he isn't lying about...
Click to expand...

He uses a lot of words to say little and lie alot. Not to mention to hide from actually answering questions.

Kamala Kamala Kamala like she can just snap her finger and make things happen.
 
Vance might have had the advantage early because a lot of the subject matter put the Harris campaign more in a defensive posture. That reversed in the second half of the debate.

Again, though, this was nice to listen to compared to most political dialog in this day and age. Both Walz and Vance agreed on a lot of things. That in itself might make some people's heads explode. I thought we went back to the 60s and 70s.
 
PCmor7 said:
Vance might have had the advantage early because a lot of the subject matter put the Harris campaign more in a defensive posture. That reversed in the second half of the debate.

Again, though, this was nice to listen to compared to most political dialog in this day and age. Both Walz and Vance agreed on a lot of things. That in itself might make some people's heads explode. I thought we went back to the 60s and 70s.
Click to expand...

Vance’s goal was to make himself seem likable, because much of America thinks he’s a douche.

I’m sure MAGA is pissed he was being cordial
 
MickZagger said:
Vance’s goal was to make himself seem likable, because much of America thinks he’s a douche.

I’m sure MAGA is pissed he was being cordial
Click to expand...

Wasn't very likeable even in being cordial.
 
Vance sounded smarmy. Admittedly we weren't unbiased but room erupted into whoops when he said Trump saved ACA and praised Trump for peaceful transfer of power.

It wasn't wipeout. Unlike Trump, Vance did prepare but no preparation can enable him to say women should trust him when he wants to force every woman to carry every pregnancy no matter what.
 
crandc said:
Vance sounded smarmy. Admittedly we weren't unbiased but room erupted into whoops when he said Trump saved ACA and praised Trump for peaceful transfer of power.

It wasn't wipeout. Unlike Trump, Vance did prepare but no preparation can enable him to say women should trust him when he wants to force every woman to carry every pregnancy no matter what.
Click to expand...

Very hilarious a guy trying to sound smart telling the uneducated to not listen to smart people.
 
Mods began debate with Walz misstatement from over 20 years ago but never asked Vance about Trump constant lying including yesterday when he said Biden not responding to Hurricane Helene.
 
Vance claimed he never supported national abortion ban. He is on record saying he wants abortion outlawed everywhere. Which is a national abortion ban.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
GY2Wu4KX0AAoEaf
Click to expand...
Working SLy, what happened?
 
One guy trying to deflect and blame everyone who isn't actually at fault. Basically making false and divisive statements over and over.

The other is offering solutions and talking policy.

Very clear win for Walz as far as I'm concerned.
 
"Tim Walz is the neighbor who mows your lawn when you break your leg. JD Vance is the neighbor who complains to the HOA that your grass is too tall."

- Random internet comment
 
I’m still trying to figure out how many kids Vance has
 
Since when are VP’s on the hook for implementing policy? Its like she’s the incumbent, but really not..
 
crandc said:
Vance claimed he never supported national abortion ban. He is on record saying he wants abortion outlawed everywhere. Which is a national abortion ban.
Click to expand...
It's not hard to comprehend his position. He would be happy if each individual state were to choose to outlaw abortion, but he does not support a federal law banning abortion.
 
PtldPlatypus said:
It's not hard to comprehend his position. He would be happy if each individual state were to choose to outlaw abortion, but he does not support a federal law banning abortion.
Click to expand...

That's his position today, yes. A couple of years ago, the evidence suggests something else.

barfo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top