NJNetz
BBW Banned
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2004
- Messages
- 14,413
- Likes
- 88
- Points
- 48
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>(May 28) - Tobey Maguire isn't giving up his Spider-Man tights just yet.
Earlier this week movie blogs across the internet were abuzz with rumors, first reported on Latino Review, that Sony was looking to recast the dual role of Peter Parker/Spidey for "Spider-Man 4" and that 25-year-old Patrick Fugit ("Almost Famous") and 21-year-old Michael Angarano ("Sky High") were the top two contenders.
But Sony wasted no time in shooting down those rumors. Studio spokesperson Steve Elzer unequivocally denies that anyone but Maguire has ever been considered for the role, saying "there's not a scintilla of truth to [the report]."
In fact, Sony has yet to confirm that "Spider-Man 4" is even in the works.
The studio had no comment when, in mid-May, Cinematical ran a story claiming that Sony was so enamored with a story arc submitted by screenwriter James Vanderbilt ("Zodiac") that they had decided to split his script into two movies and film "Spider-Man 4" and "5" back-to-back.</div>
Source
Earlier this week movie blogs across the internet were abuzz with rumors, first reported on Latino Review, that Sony was looking to recast the dual role of Peter Parker/Spidey for "Spider-Man 4" and that 25-year-old Patrick Fugit ("Almost Famous") and 21-year-old Michael Angarano ("Sky High") were the top two contenders.
But Sony wasted no time in shooting down those rumors. Studio spokesperson Steve Elzer unequivocally denies that anyone but Maguire has ever been considered for the role, saying "there's not a scintilla of truth to [the report]."
In fact, Sony has yet to confirm that "Spider-Man 4" is even in the works.
The studio had no comment when, in mid-May, Cinematical ran a story claiming that Sony was so enamored with a story arc submitted by screenwriter James Vanderbilt ("Zodiac") that they had decided to split his script into two movies and film "Spider-Man 4" and "5" back-to-back.</div>
Source
