Trade Ideas Thread

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Status
Not open for further replies.
He had a career year shooting the 3 but was that an outlier or not? Who knows but he's a career 33.6% shooter from downtown. I know players usually improve their 3pt% under Stotts but I would rather not have another wing that other teams leave open. You often post per36 stats on here and if you look at Lamb's he didn't actually improve outside of about 1 assist per game and the 3pt%. His improved numbers this year are strictly due to averaging 5-6 minutes per game more than he had previously. He also got off to a hot start this year and cooled off. I wouldn't mind having him but he's nothing special or worth pursuing in a trade.
His defense improved as well.

So he hasn't improved that much even though his defense, passing, and 3pt shooting notably improved?

I wouldn't do that 1st trade, but the 2nd one is a great deal for us and Charlotte.
 
Last edited:
Why would we use the tpe for Bayless?.That would make even less sense. My proposal was also possibly at the trade deadline
We'd use the TPE for Bayless because Philly has the 10th, 26th, 38th, 39th, 56th, and 60th picks in the draft plus all their own future picks and several good future 2nd round picks from other teams. We need draft capital to move up in the draft to get a difference maker or multiple chances to hit a home run with lower picks. Bayless can take Napier's spot for a year as insurance while we give Baldwin heavy minutes. It would also be better to have an actual expiring contract to use at the trade deadline instead of ones that are still a summer away from being expiring.
 
We'd use the TPE for Bayless because Philly has the 10th, 26th, 38th, 39th, 56th, and 60th picks in the draft plus all their own future picks and several good future 2nd round picks from other teams. We need draft capital to move up in the draft to get a difference maker or multiple chances to hit a home run with lower picks. Bayless can take Napier's spot for a year as insurance while we give Baldwin heavy minutes. It would also be better to have an actual expiring contract to use at the trade deadline instead of ones that are still a summer away from being expiring.
Exactly.
 
His defense improved as well.

So he hasn't improved that much even though his defense, passing, and 2pt shooting notably improved?

I wouldn't do that 1st trade, but the 2nd one is a great deal for us and Charlotte.
I think you meant 3pt shooting because his 2pt shooting went down. Like I said, it's hard to tell if it was an outlier year or not. Harkless shot 41.5% this year. I'd be ecstatic if he was really that good but we won't know until next year. The passing wasn't significant enough to say it was really that much of an improvement. Defensively, even if slightly improved is still not great. He's a career backup SG who isn't a great shooter.

Aminu is better than Lamb. I'd rather just wait out Turner and Leonard's contracts than move down in the draft (once again the Hawks would never ever do this trade) and have to take salary back. I'm all for possibly trading bad contracts for bad contracts but I don't want to give up picks to do so either.
 
His defense improved as well.

So he hasn't improved that much even though his defense, passing, and 2pt shooting notably improved?

I wouldn't do that 1st trade, but the 2nd one is a great deal for us and Charlotte.
I used to really like Lamb but I've just kind of given up on him.
 
I think you meant 3pt shooting because his 2pt shooting went down. Like I said, it's hard to tell if it was an outlier year or not. Harkless shot 41.5% this year. I'd be ecstatic if he was really that good but we won't know until next year. The passing wasn't significant enough to say it was really that much of an improvement. Defensively, even if slightly improved is still not great. He's a career backup SG who isn't a great shooter.

Aminu is better than Lamb. I'd rather just wait out Turner and Leonard's contracts than move down in the draft (once again the Hawks would never ever do this trade) and have to take salary back. I'm all for possibly trading bad contracts for bad contracts but I don't want to give up picks to do so either.
Yes, I meant 3pt shooting. I don't think it's a fluke. His shot is smooth, he's been an 84% 3pt shooter, had years of 34 & 35%.. His passing improved yet you're discounting. Ast rate increased by 50%... If he doesn't pan out he's a free agent and oh well. He was an above average defender last year, 7'0 wingspan at 6'5.

He'd be a much better option than Pat or Bazz. That I have no doubt about. So if you can think of a better backup guard that can defend, shoot, and attack the rim, that is actually acquireable, lemme know.

The Hawks would do this... they need big man depth, Plumlee is a worse contract than Leonard so they save money next year... they could send Aminu elsewhere (LAC TPE?) and save money this year too. Plus an early 2nd next year (LAL)?

Aminu is better than Lamb? Ehhh. We replace Aminu with the better Marvin Williams so I don't know why you're viewing it as an Aminu vs. Lamb scemario.
 
We'd use the TPE for Bayless because Philly has the 10th, 26th, 38th, 39th, 56th, and 60th picks in the draft plus all their own future picks and several good future 2nd round picks from other teams. We need draft capital to move up in the draft to get a difference maker or multiple chances to hit a home run with lower picks. Bayless can take Napier's spot for a year as insurance while we give Baldwin heavy minutes. It would also be better to have an actual expiring contract to use at the trade deadline instead of ones that are still a summer away from being expiring.

I would pass as we would be in luxury tax hell for maybe one or two second round picks.
 
Yes, I meant 3pt shooting. I don't think it's a fluke. His shot is smooth, he's been an 84% 3pt shooter, had years of 34 & 35%.. His passing improved yet you're discounting. Ast rate increased by 50%... If he doesn't pan out he's a free agent and oh well. He was an above average defender last year, 7'0 wingspan at 6'5.

He'd be a much better option than Pat or Bazz. That I have no doubt about. So if you can think of a better backup guard that can defend, shoot, and attack the rim, that is actually acquireable, lemme know.

The Hawks would do this... they need big man depth, Plumlee is a worse contract than Leonard so they save money next year... they could send Aminu elsewhere (LAC TPE?) and save money this year too. Plus an early 2nd next year (LAL)?

Aminu is better than Lamb? Ehhh. We replace Aminu with the better Marvin Williams so I don't know why you're viewing it as an Aminu vs. Lamb scemario.
Look, I get why he should be good but it hasn't translated to much in the NBA so far in 6 seasons. I'm not discrediting his improvement in passing I just feel like assists don't always tell the whole story. Like Dame could absolutely average double digit assists if he had better finishers. I just don't think he is good enough to warrant taking on Williams and Plumlee. If we are going to take on those kind of contracts I'd rather it be for Noah or Deng or as mentioned above Bayless who are going to help us improve draft position not decrease it.

Honestly, I'd rather just give the minutes to Baldwin and Hutchinson (or whoever we take) to develop them as it is way more likely (although still a long shot either way) that Baldwin turns into a stud than Lamb. I already mentioned Jeremy Lin as he could run an offense a little more effectively than Lamb as opposed to just scoring. I wouldn't really have a problem with acquiring Lamb. I doubt he'd be that tough to get. I just don't think that roster at about $137 million is that much better than the team this year plus we'd have a worse pick. If Atlanta got something for Aminu, I'd rather it be us that got something for him too.
 
Look, I get why he should be good but it hasn't translated to much in the NBA so far in 6 seasons. I'm not discrediting his improvement in passing I just feel like assists don't always tell the whole story. Like Dame could absolutely average double digit assists if he had better finishers. I just don't think he is good enough to warrant taking on Williams and Plumlee. If we are going to take on those kind of contracts I'd rather it be for Noah or Deng or as mentioned above Bayless who are going to help us improve draft position not decrease it.

Honestly, I'd rather just give the minutes to Baldwin and Hutchinson (or whoever we take) to develop them as it is way more likely (although still a long shot either way) that Baldwin turns into a stud than Lamb. I already mentioned Jeremy Lin as he could run an offense a little more effectively than Lamb as opposed to just scoring. I wouldn't really have a problem with acquiring Lamb. I doubt he'd be that tough to get. I just don't think that roster at about $137 million is that much better than the team this year plus we'd have a worse pick. If Atlanta got something for Aminu, I'd rather it be us that got something for him too.
Taking on Williams? Williams is still a very good and very underrated player. He's a better version of Aminu. He shot 41% from 3pt last year, with a 60TS% and good defense. If we want to give minutes to Baldwin or a rookie, I'd say bench Turner then. Add Lamb, as he can play SG and SF much better than Turner can and gives us the multi-dimensional scorer/ball-handler we need, and then play the young guys instead of ET. I think we're 3-4 wins better, and if Williams and Harkless shoot like they did last year (both at 41%), we'd have the pieces to consistently make teams pay for loaded up on our guards. If Collins developed into a 36%+ 3pt shooter next year as well, we'd be set.
 
I would think about doing 24 and a future 2nd for 26 and 39. That'd be solid.

But if we're gonna take on Bayless, I want #10. Maybe #24 and our 2019 1st for Bayless and #10 could work, but I doubt it.
 
We'd use the TPE for Bayless because Philly has the 10th, 26th, 38th, 39th, 56th, and 60th picks in the draft plus all their own future picks and several good future 2nd round picks from other teams. We need draft capital to move up in the draft to get a difference maker or multiple chances to hit a home run with lower picks. Bayless can take Napier's spot for a year as insurance while we give Baldwin heavy minutes. It would also be better to have an actual expiring contract to use at the trade deadline instead of ones that are still a summer away from being expiring.
Well, I don't see them giving up 10 and 2nd round picks really aren't that valuable compared to taking on nearly 9mil more plus the luxury tax cost. There are other players in Leonard' range that we might be able to entice. Ross, Dudley, Koufus, are just a few.
 
Ok I should have asked it like this: Do you guys think we could get Kristaps Porziņģis offering up Zack Collins and Moe Harkless? The Knicks where rumored to have a lot of interest last season.
 
Ok I should have asked it like this: Do you guys think we could get Kristaps Porziņģis offering up Zack Collins and Moe Harkless? The Knicks where rumored to have a lot of interest last season.
No. Do you think the Knicks could get Damian Lillard for Frank Ntilikina and Courtney Lee...?
 
Ok I should have asked it like this: Do you guys think we could get Kristaps Porziņģis offering up Zack Collins and Moe Harkless? The Knicks where rumored to have a lot of interest last season.
How is that any better? What part of there is no chance at all of them trading Porzingis let alone for that do you not understand?
 
So some Blazer fans have been tossing around the idea of CJ+24 for Love+8.

I'd try this hybrid version with Cleveland:

POR Gets: Kevin Love, George Hill, 8th Pick
CLE Gets: C.J. McCollum, Al-Farouq Aminu, Maurice Harkless, 24th Pick

I think that's a little better for them, and would get us closer to a deal.

I'd draft Mikal Bridges at 8, then I'd offer the Knicks a package of Turner, Swanigan (TPE) and our 2019 1st for Courtney Lee and Damyeon Dotson

Lillard / Hill
Lee / Hill
Bridges / FA?
Love / Collins
Nurkic / Davis

Now I'm gonna turn it into a super-pipe-dream. Lets say we resign Davis and Nurkic for a combined $22M a year... In the off-season of 2019 we'd have:
Lillard $29M
Love $26M
Nurkic+Davis $22M
Lee $13M
Leonard $11M
Collins $4M
Bridges $3M
Minimum Contracts: $4M total
Total Salary: $112M

We could then hypothetically try to pitch Klay Thompson. Klay grew up here with Kevin Love, who he was great friends with. Golden State might not be able to afford everyone, and Klay seems like the type to possibly leave. If we landed him, we could offer Golden State the expiring contracts of Lee (who could replace Thompson as a 3-and-D shooter in the starting lineup), Leonard (who might actually be a good fit for them as a 3pt shooting C), minimum contracts, as well as our 2020 and 2022 1sts. If they wanted more for helping us, we could give up a 2024 1st as well. We'd be at around $118M in salary. Assuming the tax-line is $123M, we could try to bring back George Hill on a small contract.

Lillard / Hill
Thompson / Hill
Bridges / FA?
Love / Collins
Nurkic / Davis

I dunno... I think that acquiring Love and then trying to somehow go after Klay Thompson in 2019 might be the move.
 
So some Blazer fans have been tossing around the idea of CJ+24 for Love+8.

I'd try this hybrid version with Cleveland:

POR Gets: Kevin Love, George Hill, 8th Pick
CLE Gets: C.J. McCollum, Al-Farouq Aminu, Maurice Harkless, 24th Pick

I think that's a little better for them, and would get us closer to a deal.

I'd draft Mikal Bridges at 8, then I'd offer the Knicks a package of Turner, Swanigan (TPE) and our 2019 1st for Courtney Lee and Damyeon Dotson

Lillard / Hill
Lee / Hill
Bridges / FA?
Love / Collins
Nurkic / Davis

Now I'm gonna turn it into a super-pipe-dream. Lets say we resign Davis and Nurkic for a combined $22M a year... In the off-season of 2019 we'd have:
Lillard $29M
Love $26M
Nurkic+Davis $22M
Lee $13M
Leonard $11M
Collins $4M
Bridges $3M
Minimum Contracts: $4M total
Total Salary: $112M

We could then hypothetically try to pitch Klay Thompson. Klay grew up here with Kevin Love, who he was great friends with. Golden State might not be able to afford everyone, and Klay seems like the type to possibly leave. If we landed him, we could offer Golden State the expiring contracts of Lee (who could replace Thompson as a 3-and-D shooter in the starting lineup), Leonard (who might actually be a good fit for them as a 3pt shooting C), minimum contracts, as well as our 2020 and 2022 1sts. If they wanted more for helping us, we could give up a 2024 1st as well. We'd be at around $118M in salary. Assuming the tax-line is $123M, we could try to bring back George Hill on a small contract.

Lillard / Hill
Thompson / Hill
Bridges / FA?
Love / Collins
Nurkic / Davis

I dunno... I think that acquiring Love and then trying to somehow go after Klay Thompson in 2019 might be the move.
The only GM in the League who could do this is Danny Ainge, but Olshey? Never ever
 
POR Gets: Miles Plumlee, 30th Pick, 33rd Pick
ATL Gets: Evan Turner 24th Pick, Future 2nd

OR

POR Gets: 19th Pick, Miles Plumlee
ATL Gets: 24th Pick, Future 2nd, Meyers Leonard
 
Why would Cleveland give Love and a very high pick in a top heavy draft for a player who doesn’t even fit them that well and a much lower pick?
 
Why would Cleveland give Love and a very high pick in a top heavy draft for a player who doesn’t even fit them that well and a much lower pick?
Cleveland doesn't really use Love well, so a 3-and-D PF males sense in that role.. They need someone that can create their own which They dont have outside of Clarkson (who isn't a great shooter so he struggles to play off LeBron, CJ could do both). Harkless replaces Green who's warned a decent contract somewhere else.

I don't think they take it there's just been a lot of fans talking about it.
 
If we are going to resign Nurk I really do not see us doing much of anything unless it means giving up Zach and CJ. The other pieces we have will net us not much but the same team (in my opinion) I think it would be interesting to see what draft pick we could get this year for CJ.
 
The only trade that has a chance is the Crabbe TPE.
And even that isn't likely; because why go into luxury cap hell for a mediocre player; and it seems that is all that would be available for 12 million.
 
And even that isn't likely; because why go into luxury cap hell for a mediocre player; and it seems that is all that would be available for 12 million.

Pretty much. More likely we use the MLE.
 
If we are going to resign Nurk I really do not see us doing much of anything unless it means giving up Zach and CJ. The other pieces we have will net us not much but the same team (in my opinion) I think it would be interesting to see what draft pick we could get this year for CJ.
I don't think we will resign Nurk like everyone else does and if we do they find a trade for CJ.
Cleveland doesn't really use Love well, so a 3-and-D PF males sense in that role.. They need someone that can create their own which They dont have outside of Clarkson (who isn't a great shooter so he struggles to play off LeBron, CJ could do both). Harkless replaces Green who's warned a decent contract somewhere else.

I don't think they take it there's just been a lot of fans talking about it.
Too damn bad fans don't run the teams.
 
Derozen + Ibaka for CJ + our #1 (24) pick + Collins

Dame / Derozen ?

Sign Nurkic

Sign Napier
DeRozan and Ibaka make almost $50 million combined next year. That isn't even close to enough money going back to them for a trade to work.
 
DeRozan straight up for CJ? DeRozan gets shut down by JR Smith every year.
 
Derozen + Ibaka for CJ + our #1 (24) pick + Collins

Dame / Derozen ?

Sign Nurkic

Sign Napier

drake1.gif
 
So Take Ibaka out of the deal....

CJ + Collins + #1 pick
For
DeRozen

Do you make the trade?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top