ponderguy
Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2013
- Messages
- 789
- Likes
- 13
- Points
- 18
Yeah, because you can never have too many overpaid players that suck.
That seems to be the entire strategy behind the 3-10 Knicks roster. Why on earth do you keep suggesting that the 13-2 Blazers trading with the 3-10 Knicks is a good idea? The Knicks are 3-10 because their players suck. Adding players that suck to our roster does not make us better. If Melo and Bargs are so great, why are the Knicks 3-10?
BNM
It's not melos fault they are 3-10, and I was joking about WANTING bargs. If we had to take him back to match salaries I'd do it though

