Religion Trump and guns

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

barfo

triggered obsessive commie pinko boomer maniac
Staff member
Global Moderator
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
34,557
Likes
25,731
Points
113
So, I'm a little surprised that none of our gun fans here have complained about what Trump said yesterday, namely that the government should seize guns from citizens first, and worry about due process second.

Didn't that bother any 2nd amendment defenders even a little bit? I'm looking at you, @MARIS61 and @MarAzul and @Jade Falcon ...

barfo
 
Gang of chronic law-breaking vandalizers = "guerrilla artists collective" by the same company that misquoted a cop saying "illegal" to "undocumented"
Didn't even read it. Thought it was pretty crafty just seeing it on the news. Tricked me
 
So, I'm a little surprised that none of our gun fans here have complained about what Trump said yesterday, namely that the government should seize guns from citizens first, and worry about due process second.

Didn't that bother any 2nd amendment defenders even a little bit? I'm looking at you, @MARIS61 and @MarAzul and @Jade Falcon ...

barfo
What did he say? I’m ready to call him a dirty cuck.
 
If this fat orange cuck really did say some shit about cuck gun control, then all this hoopla about Russia might make sense.

There’s some cuckery afoot boys.
They unveil invincible nukes and take our guns. Russia is cold as shit isn't it? Like freeeezing cold.
 
So, I'm a little surprised that none of our gun fans here have complained about what Trump said yesterday, namely that the government should seize guns from citizens first, and worry about due process second.

Didn't that bother any 2nd amendment defenders even a little bit? I'm looking at you, @MARIS61 and @MarAzul and @Jade Falcon ...

barfo

He was a moron before, and he's still a moron. Nothing has changed.
 
So, I'm a little surprised that none of our gun fans here have complained about what Trump said yesterday, namely that the government should seize guns from citizens first, and worry about due process second.

Didn't that bother any 2nd amendment defenders even a little bit? I'm looking at you, @MARIS61 and @MarAzul and @Jade Falcon ...

barfo

Can you give me a little more to get hyped on barf?

Your word is just not overwhelming the day.
 
Can you give me a little more to get hyped on barf?

Your word is just not overwhelming the day.

Are you saying you missed Trumps new views on gun control? Ok then:

"Number one, you can take the guns away immediately from people that you can adjudge easily are mentally ill, like this guy."

"Some of you people are petrified of the NRA. You can't be petrified."

"Take the guns first, go through due process second."

barfo
 
Are you saying you missed Trumps new views on gun control? Ok then:

"Number one, you can take the guns away immediately from people that you can adjudge easily are mentally ill, like this guy."

"Some of you people are petrified of the NRA. You can't be petrified."

"Take the guns first, go through due process second."

barfo

I sort of need to see the law I am going to get barf. No spare energy to blow on what if stuff.
 
So, I'm a little surprised that none of our gun fans here have complained about what Trump said yesterday, namely that the government should seize guns from citizens first, and worry about due process second.

Didn't that bother any 2nd amendment defenders even a little bit? I'm looking at you, @MARIS61 and @MarAzul and @Jade Falcon ...

barfo

I saw 3 different clips of him supposedly saying that, but he was quite clearly speaking exclusively about people already determined to be mentally ill (due process).

More Fake News about his clumsy way of throwing thoughts together.
 
I saw 3 different clips of him supposedly saying that, but he was quite clearly speaking exclusively about people already determined to be mentally ill (due process).

More Fake News about his clumsy way of throwing thoughts together.
He took 3 positions that I heard that had nothing to do with the mentally ill.
1) raise the age limit to purchase assault weapons
2) He said he was against the right to carry concealed weapons across state lines.
3) He supports background checks on ALL gun purchases
 
He took 3 positions that I heard that had nothing to do with the mentally ill.
1) raise the age limit to purchase assault weapons
2) He said he was against the right to carry concealed weapons across state lines.
3) He supports background checks on ALL gun purchases

Just for kicks, let us assume for a moment, that this passes. Will you shut the fuck up forever about guns?
 
Ha!
Thanks for not really telling a whopper. Carry on!
Honestly I don't care about the CC across state lines. I would like a higher bar for people to conceal carry, more training, but if someone puts in the effort for safety and ability and follows the laws, CC doesn't bother me. '

I do think raising the age limit is an excellent idea and I also want background checks on all purchases and a national database.

Additionally I would like magazine restrictions, requirements of gun safes/cabinets for all firearms, Much greater restrictions regarding those who have criminal past, abuse charges, documented mental instability... from purchasing.

At that point, I would shut up.
 
I do think raising the age limit is an excellent idea

I think stripping a 20 year old woman of her god given right to protect herself with arms if necessary, is the damnedest dumbest thing we could do.
It would be the first time in the history of this country we were ever so thoughtless.
 
I think stripping a 20 year old woman of her god given right to protect herself with arms if necessary, is the damnedest dumbest thing we could do.
It would be the first time in the history of this country we were ever so thoughtless.
the first? How bout slavery to name just one.
 
It also seems very convoluted that a person is deemed to be mature enough to vote but still you deny them the right to defend themselves.
Wtf sort of logic is that?
voting is tempered by the voices of millions of others while a bullet is the sole decision of it's user.
 
Oh please don't deflect from the issue at hand. You speak of 153 years ago in a discussion of today.
I was responding to your asinine assertion "It would be the first time in the history of this country we were ever so thoughtless." Speak dumb statements get an antiquated response
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top