OT Trump picks....

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
totus44

totus44

Lord of the Dark Side
Joined
Dec 6, 2013
Messages
8,087
Likes
1,455
Points
113
Political hot stove....who does Trump pick for cabinet posts, judges?

Also which pieces of legislation get canned in first 100 days?

Speculate away....
 
CxKJCPcUsAAg8a3.jpg

0 replies2,069 retweets3,927 likes
 
Guessing rudy as atty genl and kelly Ayotte as sty of defense
 
Didn't take long. Reince Prebus as Chief of Staff.....great pick and good move for Ryan.
 
Messiah717 said:
It truly amazing that Trump has shattered the Democratic Party. It was supposed to be the other way around.
Click to expand...


My choice at the polls was neither for either of the lead candidates, I was primarily there for congress and local elections. I will admit though when Trump ended up as the winner I laughed so hard I cried. Hillary Hogg and her cronies probably thought this election would be a shoe in, not to be. Billy and Hilly need to pack their bags and crawl off into a hole, close mouth and maintain a low profile. To these supporting the losing side, nice job by the liberals and all with dung filled diapers showing the intelligence to tear and burn because your person lost. That type of behavior was pre labeled to Trump supporters had Trump lost. Looks like the worm turned. I do feel that Trump will select a good cadre to help run his administration. I do wish the man success, maybe this country needed a knee jerk election like this to wake up the "business as usual" politicians up in DC. Saw his list of potential selections and their are some good choices in there. Pence as Veep, and Prebus as Chief of Staff were good moves. Pulling for Guliani to get in there as well.
 
Bannon as Chief strategist. Sr Counsel is the first bonehead move....going with loyalty over reality. If we're playing WH You're Fired edition. He'll go first.
 
Lindsey Graham advocating Ted Cruz to be nominated to SC. There was talk thst Sen Mike Lee was on a short list, and my guess is that the other senators would rather get rid of Ted. Lol!
 
What looked like a smooth transition b/t two men one a POTUS, the other "Elect"; tried to show the fkd up world, America can peacefully co-exist b/t ideologies/parties; but obviously not.

these rioting libtards look no different than some Arab Spring riots; to those watching overseas???? Just consider the source(s) of Kankle supporter's. One who has more than dishonored American values, principles, et al, makes sense as too their lack of patriotic Why would anyone in their right mind wish such upon any one; because they aren't in their right minds, they have left minds....

then we have the Teflon Don, his supporter's not much better, when it comes to stirring up shit.
Yankeefan5545 said:
My choice at the polls was neither for either of the lead candidates, I was primarily there for congress and local elections. I will admit though when Trump ended up as the winner I laughed so hard I cried. Hillary Hogg and her cronies probably thought this election would be a shoe in, not to be. Billy and Hilly need to pack their bags and crawl off into a hole, close mouth and maintain a low profile. To these supporting the losing side, nice job by the liberals and all with dung filled diapers showing the intelligence to tear and burn because your person lost. That type of behavior was pre labeled to Trump supporters had Trump lost. Looks like the worm turned. I do feel that Trump will select a good cadre to help run his administration. I do wish the man success, maybe this country needed a knee jerk election like this to wake up the "business as usual" politicians up in DC. Saw his list of potential selections and their are some good choices in there. Pence as Veep, and Prebus as Chief of Staff were good moves. Pulling for Guliani to get in there as well.
Click to expand...


...^^^

Couldn't of said it better Michael, kudos...~!~

Guliani: U.S. District Attorney....? Why not?

Lt. General Ronald Marcotte: Secretary of State; or- Secretary of Defense. Would have to pry him away from Boeing first.

Nothing like having a Sec. of State, who was the Air Commander of LRCA during Desert Storm, as well as the Wing Commander of the B2 Fleet; latter on. Wonder how Iranian Nuke Meeting's would go across, when a known War Hawk comes to pay a visit....
 
Bolton for SecState makes a lot more sense. Accomplished diplomat, likes tough talk (like trump), and leans America first (more isolationist than interventionist) excluding the bomb terrorists mercilessly aspect.
 
totus44 said:
Lindsey Graham advocating Ted Cruz to be nominated to SC. There was talk thst Sen Mike Lee was on a short list, and my guess is that the other senators would rather get rid of Ted. Lol!
Click to expand...

As much as most senators would like that they have to be careful who and how that spot is filled as the seats are close in the senate now and they would not want to lose a seat to a democrat. Why a don't see a senator in the cabinet.
 
Jack Hannah as Secretary of Interior; or anyone other than another businessman. Will Melania think this job is her's or an interior decorator?

Govenor Moonbeam, Secretary of Interstellar and Extraterrestrial Communications.


Nationalize- “Waste Mgmt”, as an outsourced entity, to run “Dept. of Housing and Urban Development”; in lieu of having redundant agencies, and a needless Secretary. Otherwise hire Haliburton as normal, and run land movers for the next four years. Relocate migrants, and UN-desirables to Haiti; let the Clinton Foundation figure out a way to pay for NAFTA's excesses. aka- charge TCF to fix the fck up billybob created.

Kaku for Secretary of Education.

General Petraeus for Veteran's Affairs. Which kind of Vet Affairs are we talking????

Rudy is being bantered around for several positions, incl one he doesn't want, ie Dept of Homeland Sec. Anyone think Rudy could pass before Congress as a Supreme Court Justice??? Just curious??
 
...they need to change the term limits for Senators and Congressmen and SC Justices.
 
yankeesince59 said:
...they need to change the term limits for Senators and Congressmen and SC Justices.
Click to expand...
They did for CA state govt and things actually got much worse. You still end up with an elite class of professional politicians, they just collude more to divy up the job openings.
 
yankeesince59 said:
...California?...lol.
Click to expand...
yup....once a pol terms out, they trade places with another pol and if a seat isn't open they get appointed to some other govt role and then move back to their original post. its a revolving door of DEM corruption at its finest.
 
...lol...the Dems certainly don't have the market cornered on corruption.

...corruption follows power, always has, always will... and right now the GOP has the power.
 
yankeesince59 said:
...lol...the Dems certainly don't have the market cornered on corruption.

...corruption follows power, always has, always will... and right now the GOP has the power.
Click to expand...

They do in CA such that party in control is a mortal lock. Look you can play all the moral equivalence word games you'd like, but the facts are what they are in CA. This was a red state, and it's a 30 yr road map for single party rule. There is a point of no return because the other option is "too big to fail".

Term limits have to be independent of specific office, ie year of govt service, or very specific to each office.

We have 2 4yr terms for President
Want to you want for Senate? 2x6?
House? 4x2 or more?
SC? 2 x 8yr terms?

The implications on SC takes on score settling....would prefer age limit vs term limit. Say rather than 3x8yr terms...min age of 50 and max of 75.
 
...^^^no "word games" here... you were the one who singled out the Dems as "corrupt", not me...I simply pointed out that Washington in general is corrupt and not just the Democrats...simple as that.

...and Cali alone should not be used as a yardstick.
 
yankeesince59 said:
...^^^no "word games" here... you were the one who singled out the Dems as "corrupt", not me...I simply pointed out that Washington in general is corrupt and not just the Democrats...simple as that.

...and Cali alone should not be used as a yardstick.
Click to expand...
I didn't single out DEMS, I was talking about CA regarding term limits. In this case, the DEMS used it to further corrupt and lock in single party rule. To be clear, the DEMS singled themselves out here.

And hey, you can either learn for this yardstick or not. But when Little Rock urban population starts dictating everything in your great state of Arkansas, don't come bitching to me about because I'll say I told you so.

You want to find fault with both parties and point equal blame at them, fine. Then we can agree to disagree because they are not remotely equivalent in corruption, criminal or values. Sorry to characterize it as a game, wasn't my intent to belittle your believe. Rather I complete and honestly disagree with your premise in total.
 
1...^^^uhhh, yes you did;

"yup....once a pol terms out, they trade places with another pol and if a seat isn't open they get appointed to some other govt role and then move back to their original post. its a revolving door of DEM corruption at its finest."

...sound familiar?

=====================

2. Sorry to disappoint you, but I've never been in Arkansas in my life...try again.

=====================

3. You "disagree with my premise"...wtf are you talking about now?....what premise?

====================

4. Prove to me that Dems are any more corrupt than Republicans and I will yield...I'll wait
 
..."comrade"?...seriously?...so instead of backing up your claims with something factual and tangible, you resort to this?...very compelling.
 
totus44 said:
CA. This was a red state, and it's a 30 yr road map for single party rule, ie blue***. There is a point of no return because the other option is "too big to fail".

*** my own revision.
.
Click to expand...

Caly was a red state; has been a blue; but as of as of Jan. 1st, 018, this state turns from red to blue, then to Green...!!!
 
Loving Pompeo for CIA. Smart man, his Benghazi questioning of Clinton was brutal. West Point grad and Harvard law.

Sessions as AG means we'll have a DOJ again. I hope his first act it to arrest mayor's fir sanctuary cities and charge them with aiding and abetting felons.

Flynn is sold too. Not sure why all the talking heads are upset there...where was the indignation over Ben fucking Rhodes?
 
totus44 said:
Loving Pompeo for CIA. Smart man, his Benghazi questioning of Clinton was brutal. West Point grad and Harvard law.

Sessions as AG means we'll have a DOJ again. I hope his first act it to arrest mayor's fir sanctuary cities and charge them with aiding and abetting felons.

Flynn is sold too. Not sure why all the talking heads are upset there...where was the indignation over Ben fucking Rhodes?
Click to expand...

Pompeo was great in grilling and hooking Hillary, only wish they had of gutted her like any other Fish....

I was hoping Pompeo would be our next D.A., but the CIA Job, is a great place for him, esp. in lieu of his feelings/thoughts on Benghazi's fk ups....

fry Rhodes with Hillary....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top