Nothing pathetic about a pertinent legislator pointing out another impeachable act to add to the list. Do you actually believe that Republican Nunes never did anything outlandish when he served in the same role in the House Intelligence committee? The difference between the two? Schiff actually had a legitimate reason.
He shouldnt have cared either, and he made plenty of Blunders, I am not denying that at all. I am saying that focusing on the Blunders that werent important was a bad political strategy by the left. I am not saying that Trump has t made those mistakes.
It's a feeble attempt to show that you don't need no damned book larnin' to do anythin'.
Don't you think impeachment and truthful revelations about the state of the union are getting us somewhere? I do. I want innocent hard working people who are being thrown under the bus to have their say about how this went down. I want our oversight committee to be respected and all subpoenas to be honored by all cabinet members....transparency is not throwing lawyers at questions...Trump should have talked to Mueller one to one on record..that's transparency...obstaining from checks and balances is unconstitutional.
Ha!
It's an attempt to point out how inept he is and how he might make a fatal mistake at any moment. Once that message gets out there we can focus on doing something about the big problem, an inept, criminal, devious, traitorous President that might lead us into something truly disastrous at any moment.
But again you are going straight to the “big” stuff, and ignoring that there have been in fact really petty things that have caught news cycles that theyve ran with and I am saying all the time spent talking about the crowd size is a waste of time, and I am sure we can find more examples of things that just distracted from the bigger issues, and those smaller things also served him, because he can say oh witch hunt, those angry libs will be mad no matter what.
You can start threads about any of those huge issues....this one is about impeachment which to me is the biggest issue of the day....anything Trump related is part of the story of what led us to impeachment. If you think there are more important things...bring them on
Sure I understand this argument and I can to some degree, agree with it. It is not however how I would have handled it strategically, which is basically all Im talking about, the political strategy of all this.
So what? I can only type one sentence at a time...why do you assume I ignore any fucking thing at all? To me you are watering down the topic with comparisons of what you think are not important points...that doesn't mean anyone else around here has ignored anything
Like OT usually does this thread has branched, if you look at my original reply it was talking about “since day 1, they wanted him out” and I am just pointing out I think strategically the left has made mistakes (at least in my opinion).
Indictments to follow, when now, any day?
I'd like to discuss politics without a left and right position to start with. Trump has fired almost 100 right wing cabinet members....let's get back to being American citizens and feel free to express our opinions without the bipartisan majority tags and we'll be making some progress.
I like you river, I really do and the odd thing is I dont even disagree with you about Trump. I just dont really think you and I are even discussing the same topic at this point so I’ll bow out as its not worth fighting about. Not sure if its my fault for not making my point well, but I dont believe were getting anywhere with this and its not because of a disagreement it seems to me like were not communicating very well.
Here's the first sentence of the topic thread:
I'm not angry at you...I just have strong opinions about the state of the union right now and find it exasperating that there's any speck of reasonable doubt of Trump sympathy that can possibly be justified by any stretch of the imagination. Trump is not a victim of politics...he's a problem for all politics
