Politics Trump, Trump, Trump....

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Yeah, that doesn't really prove that his story doesn't have holes in it. Why no pictures?

I need to prove something to you. Really, are you that interested?
 
BS is BS, regardless of whether or not someone agrees with me or not. Him being against the death penalty and thinking Trump is bad for the US doesn't mean I'm going to put away my BS detectors. Nor does it all the sudden make his story seem realistic.

Well, at least we all know where you stand. ;)
 
I need to prove something to you. Really, are you that interested?

You really have to work on your bullshit detector, it's a skill to have in life. you won't fall for stupid shit you see online and pass it off as though it's true.

You also need to work on not making this about yourself. But sure, if you are the one who brings up something (you brought up that he worked with MT), but someone says "woah hold on, that doesn't sound like it's actually true", then yes, maybe you should look into it.

I'm not saying it's impossible that he met her, and worked with her. But usually when you give vague details about a story, or semi-outlandish details (they called her and she magically picked up the phone, and weirdly enough, answered in English), there's a reason why.

And that reason why is usually that you're bullshitting people.

Politicians do it all the time, so do con men. Most people don't want to actually do any of the research to find out if someone is lying to them. It's akin to the confirmation bias. You see someone who has a similar belief system as you (in this case, the guy is religious, as are you) and you probably believe he would never lie.

I see doing that as no different than all the TV evangelists who make up stories of "miracles" or politicians who get "letters from Jim, from South Carolina" who has some sappy ass story.


Well, at least we all know where you stand. ;)

You're right. We do know where I stand, and where I stand is on the ground with the other people who don't like people who lie to other people, and take advantage of other people who themselves wouldn't ever lie.
 
I'm working with Michael W. Smith as we speak to see if we can expand this thing. ;)
Have no idea who that is but I do know two guys named Mike Smith....good to hear you're proactive...
 
Could a mod change the title to "Dump Chump Trump"....askin' for a friend!

"Trump, Trump, Trump" ... hmm:

Sounds your plumbing makes just before the sewer pipe breaks.
Sounds your neighbors make when they're a bit too enthusiastic about their amorous activities.
Sounds the garbage truck makes when it's compressing a particularly nasty pile of trash.
 
You really have to work on your bullshit detector, it's a skill to have in life. you won't fall for stupid shit you see online and pass it off as though it's true.

You also need to work on not making this about yourself. But sure, if you are the one who brings up something (you brought up that he worked with MT), but someone says "woah hold on, that doesn't sound like it's actually true", then yes, maybe you should look into it.

I'm not saying it's impossible that he met her, and worked with her. But usually when you give vague details about a story, or semi-outlandish details (they called her and she magically picked up the phone, and weirdly enough, answered in English), there's a reason why.

And that reason why is usually that you're bullshitting people.

Politicians do it all the time, so do con men. Most people don't want to actually do any of the research to find out if someone is lying to them. It's akin to the confirmation bias. You see someone who has a similar belief system as you (in this case, the guy is religious, as are you) and you probably believe he would never lie.

I see doing that as no different than all the TV evangelists who make up stories of "miracles" or politicians who get "letters from Jim, from South Carolina" who has some sappy ass story.




You're right. We do know where I stand, and where I stand is on the ground with the other people who don't like people who lie to other people, and take advantage of other people who themselves wouldn't ever lie.

Did you happen to see the video as to what they're doing in Philly? Like I said, he was on a radio show that I enjoy and had a compelling message. It's why I took the 20 seconds to wiki the dude. Perhaps you don't mean to be contrarian, but you're coming across that way to me. Therefore, I don't feel the need to prove anything to you. Carry on.
 


You'd think, since it was the democrats who started the KKK, that Republicans would be a proponent of getting rid of it. Weird how they're not...gee, I wonder why..

Quick, someone tell Mitch and Trump that Obama wants to keep the statues up!
 
trump-epstein-wide.jpg
 
You'd think, since it was the democrats who started the KKK, that Republicans would be a proponent of getting rid of it. Weird how they're not...gee, I wonder why..

Quick, someone tell Mitch and Trump that Obama wants to keep the statues up!

The Democrats did not start the KKK
 
I was just thinking in the last 5 years or so we've had 2 primary elections, a general, now two more primaries and a gen in Nov, and the best we can do is Joe Biden or Donald Trump? I like Joe and he gets my vote unless he goes sideways. I would never vote for the current guy. But what bothers me, in a country that's known for new and State of the Art innovations, leading edge tech and tremendously diverse and we end up with a wacko Trump, and an A typical elite nearly 80 year old tired democratic nominee. Geez Louise....Trump fooled the world and beat out the conservatives best, and Joe with a dramatic comeback, beats out some really decent new thinking candidates, and a long term socialist, only because the Dems establishment was afraid of Bernie.
If Trump wins, and he shouldn't, that's twice the dems have blown it with old established politicians. Time to get away from the two dominate parties and realize a more equitable representation of Presidential candidates.
 
Last edited:
I was just thinking in the last 5 years or so we've had 2 primary elections, a general, now two more primaries and a gen in Nov, and the best we can do is Joe Biden or Donald Trump? I like Joe and he gets my vote unless he goes sideways. I would never vote for the current guy. But what bothers me, in a country that's known for new and State of the Art innovations, leading edge tech and tremendously diverse and we end up with a wacko Trump, and an A typical elite nearly 80 year old tired democratic nominee. Geez Louise....Trump fooled the world and beat out the conservatives best, and Joe with a dramatic comeback, beats out some really decent new thinking candidates, and a long term socialist, only because the Dems establishment was afraid of Bernie.
If Trump wins, and he shouldn't, that's twice the dems have blown it with old established politicians. Time to get away from the two dominate parties and realize a more equitable representation of Presidential candidates.
I like Bernie but I really wasn't pulling for him. I wanted mayor Pete. I also liked your favorite, Klobuchar. As for Biden, I'm reasonably happy with him and expecting good things out of him.
 
I like Bernie but I really wasn't pulling for him. I wanted mayor Pete. I also liked your favorite, Klobuchar. As for Biden, I'm reasonably happy with him and expecting good things out of him.
Oh I know Joe can play the game it politics and he’s a nice guy.
But man, quality control in our election process stinks!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top